IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2142-d1044896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling a Reverse Logistics Supply Chain for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Risk Management: A Fuzzy Risk Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Barongo Omosa

    (School of Engineering and Architecture, Meru University of Science and Technology, Meru 972-60200, Kenya)

  • Solange Ayuni Numfor

    (Change Agent Inc., 111-0053 PF Asakusabashi Building 5F, 1-19-10 Asakusabashi, Taito-ku, Tokyo 111-0053, Japan)

  • Monika Kosacka-Olejnik

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, Jacka Rychlewskiego 2 Street, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of natural resources, and End-of-Life Vehicles (ELVs) form bulky wastes when they reach the end of their useful life, hence environmental concerns. Efficiency in recycling ELVs is therefore becoming a major concern to address the number of ELVs collected and recycled to minimize environmental impacts. This paper seeks to describe several activities of a closed-loop reverse logistics supply chain for the collection and recycling of ELVs and to identify the related potential risks involved. This study further investigated the potential risks for managing the efficient recycling of ELVs by modeling and viewing the end-of-life vehicle (ELV) recycling system as a reverse logistics supply chain. ELV recycling steps and processes, including collection and transportation, as well as the laws and technologies, were analyzed for risk factor identification and analysis. The major aim of this research is to perform a unified hierarchical risk analysis to estimate the degree of risk preference to efficiently manage the ELV supply chain. This study also proposes a risk assessment procedure using fuzzy knowledge representation theory to support ELV risk analysis. As a result, the identified key risks were ranked in terms of their preference for occurrence in a reverse supply chain of ELV products and mapped into five risk zones, Very Low, Low, Medium-Low, Moderate, Serious, and Critical, for ease of visualization. Hence, with a step-by-step implementation of the presented solution, ELV recycling organizations will see benefits in terms of an improvement in their activities and thus reduced costs that may occur due to uncertainties in their overall ELV business.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Barongo Omosa & Solange Ayuni Numfor & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2023. "Modeling a Reverse Logistics Supply Chain for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Risk Management: A Fuzzy Risk Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2142-:d:1044896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2142/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Alchian, Armen A & Demsetz, Harold, 1972. "Production , Information Costs, and Economic Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(5), pages 777-795, December.
    3. Yoram Barzel, 1997. "Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets," Chapters, in: Svetozar Pejovich (ed.), The Economic Foundations of Property Rights, chapter 13, pages 171-192, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Alexandre Dolgui & Dmitry Ivanov & Boris Sokolov, 2018. "Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 414-430, January.
    6. Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Ponce, Pablo & Yu, Zhang & Ponce, Katerine, 2022. "Investigating economic growth and natural resource dependence: An asymmetric approach in developed and developing economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Bogataj, David & Bogataj, Marija, 2007. "Measuring the supply chain risk and vulnerability in frequency space," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 291-301, July.
    8. Chang, Hung-Chi & Ouyang, Liang-Yuh & Wu, Kun-Shan & Ho, Chia-Huei, 2006. "Integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory models with controllable lead time and ordering cost reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 481-495, April.
    9. Srivastava, Samir K., 2008. "Network design for reverse logistics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 535-548, August.
    10. T. V. Krishna Mohan & R. K. Amit, 2020. "Dismantlers’ dilemma in end-of-life vehicle recycling markets: a system dynamics model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 591-619, July.
    11. Peter Teuscher & Beat Grüninger & Niels Ferdinand, 2006. "Risk management in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): lessons learnt from the case of GMO‐free soybeans," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, February.
    12. B Ritchie & C Brindley, 2007. "An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1398-1411, November.
    13. Goh, Mark & Lim, Joseph Y.S. & Meng, Fanwen, 2007. "A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 164-173, October.
    14. Hallikas, Jukka & Karvonen, Iris & Pulkkinen, Urho & Virolainen, Veli-Matti & Tuominen, Markku, 2004. "Risk management processes in supplier networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 47-58, July.
    15. Leslie P. Willcocks & Mary C. Lacity, 2009. "The Practice of Outsourcing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-24084-1.
    16. Solange Ayuni Numfor & Geoffrey Barongo Omosa & Zhengyang Zhang & Kazuyo Matsubae, 2021. "A Review of Challenges and Opportunities for End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling in Developing Countries and Emerging Economies: A SWOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Vipul Jain & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan, 2017. "Application of AHP in reverse logistics service provider selection: a case study," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 94-119.
    18. Langlois, Richard N. & Robertson, Paul L., 1992. "Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 297-313, August.
    19. Subhankar Dhar & Bindu Balakrishnan, 2006. "Risks, Benefits, and Challenges in Global IT Outsourcing: Perspectives and Practices," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 14(3), pages 59-89, July.
    20. Silvana Canzano & Sante Capasso & Michele Di Natale & Alessandro Erto & Pasquale Iovino & Dino Musmarra, 2014. "Remediation of Groundwater Polluted by Aromatic Compounds by Means of Adsorption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-16, July.
    21. Sato, Fernando Enzo Kenta & Furubayashi, Takaaki & Nakata, Toshihiko, 2019. "Application of energy and CO2 reduction assessments for end-of-life vehicles recycling in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 779-794.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang Yu & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Hafiz Muhammad Zia-ul-haq & Muhammad Tanveer & Muhammad Jawad Sajid & Shehzad Ahmed, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of End-of-Life Vehicles Related Research: Exploring a Path to Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    3. Hannes Hofmann & Christian Busse & Christoph Bode & Michael Henke, 2014. "Sustainability‐Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 160-172, March.
    4. Benoit Aubert & Michel Patry & Suzanne Rivard & Heather Smith, 2000. "IT Outsourcing Risk Management at British Petroleum," CIRANO Working Papers 2000s-31, CIRANO.
    5. Benoit Aubert & Sylvie Dussault & Michel Patry & Suzanne Rivard, 1998. "Managing the Risk of IT Outsourcing," CIRANO Working Papers 98s-18, CIRANO.
    6. Benoit Aubert & Michel Patry & Suzanne Rivard, 2001. "Managing IT Outsourcing Risk: Lessons Learned," CIRANO Working Papers 2001s-39, CIRANO.
    7. Benoit Aubert & Michel Patry & Suzanne Rivard, 1998. "Assessing the Risk of IT Outsourcing," CIRANO Working Papers 98s-16, CIRANO.
    8. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui & Boris Sokolov & Marina Ivanova, 2017. "Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6158-6174, October.
    9. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 144-156.
    10. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Venkatesh, V.G. & Rathi, Snehal & Patwa, Sriyans, 2015. "Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 153-167.
    12. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    13. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    14. Emilio Alvarez-Suescun, 2010. "Combining transaction cost and resource-based insights to explain IT implementation outsourcing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 631-645, November.
    15. Dahlgrün, Philipp W. & Bausch, Andreas, 2019. "How Opportunistic Culture Affects Financial Performance in Outsourcing Relationships: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 81-100.
    16. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    17. Kaouthar Lajili & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2006. "Revisiting agency and transaction costs theory predictions on vertical financial ownership and contracting: electronic integration as an organizational form choice," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 573-586.
    18. Guertler, Benjamin & Spinler, Stefan, 2015. "When does operational risk cause supply chain enterprises to tip? A simulation of intra-organizational dynamics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 54-69.
    19. Michel, GHERTMAN, 1998. "Applications pratiques de la théorie des coûts de transaction," HEC Research Papers Series 636, HEC Paris.
    20. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2142-:d:1044896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.