IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1844-d1039823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Evolution and Multi-Scenario Simulation of Rural “Production–Ecological–Living” Space: A Case Study for Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Yu

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Shanshan Du

    (College of Applied Arts and Sciences, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Jingqiu Zhang

    (College of Applied Arts and Sciences, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

  • Jinglei Chen

    (College of Applied Arts and Sciences, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China)

Abstract

With the vigorous development of industrialization and urbanization, rural space faces many difficulties in achieving sustainable development, such as the spatial structure being unbalanced. To explore the sustainable development of rural space, this study evaluates the spatial evolution and multi-scenario simulation of rural space with reference to the three dominant functions of land use, namely “production–ecological–living” (PEL), based on the interpretation of land use remote sensing data in 2000, 2010, and 2020. The change characteristics and the formation mechanism of the territorial spatial pattern were quantitatively analyzed by gravity center transfer, territorial spatial transfer matrix, standard deviational ellipse, geo-detector, and artificial neural network CA simulation. The results showed that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the rural production space in Beijing continued to decrease, the rural living space continued to increase and then gradually contracted, and the rural ecological space as a whole also showed a downward trend. (2) During the study period, the formation and evolution of the ecological spatial pattern of rural production and living in Beijing were affected by both regional physical geographical factors and human, social, and economic factors, with significant differences; the interaction between two driving factors is stronger than that within a single factor, and the main mode of action is double factor enhancement and nonlinear enhancement. (3) Compared with the other three scenarios, the performance of Beijing’s rural space in 2030 under the harmonious development scenario is more compact and stable, the rural production space is basically guaranteed, the intensity of rural living space is enhanced, and the overall situation of rural ecological space is stable. Our results show that in the future decision-making of rural land and space development around a metropolis, we should fully consider the evolution law of rural spatial pattern, as well as the driving force of natural geographical factors and economic activity factors and discuss the optimization and overall management of rural production and living ecological space through multi-scenario spatial simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Yu & Shanshan Du & Jingqiu Zhang & Jinglei Chen, 2023. "Spatial Evolution and Multi-Scenario Simulation of Rural “Production–Ecological–Living” Space: A Case Study for Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1844-:d:1039823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yafei Wang & Xiaoli Zhao & Lijun Zuo & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiao Wang & Ling Yi & Fang Liu & Jinyong Xu, 2020. "Spatial Differentiation of Land Use and Landscape Pattern Changes in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Tianyi Zhao & Yuning Cheng & Yiyang Fan & Xiangnan Fan, 2022. "Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Jiangfu Liao & Lina Tang & Guofan Shao, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation to Predict Ecological Risk Posed by Urban Sprawl with Spontaneous Growth: A Case Study of Quanzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Peng Zeng & Sihui Wu & Zongyao Sun & Yujia Zhu & Yuqi Chen & Zhi Qiao & Liangwa Cai, 2021. "Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Hua Xue & Xin Chen, 2022. "A Multi-Scenario Simulation and Optimization of Land Use with a Markov–FLUS Coupling Model: A Case Study in Xiong’an New Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Jinkun Yang & Haitao Ma & Lisheng Weng, 2022. "Transformation of Rural Space under the Impact of Tourism: The Case of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Jie Qiao & Mike Crang & Liangping Hong & Xiaofeng Li, 2021. "Exploring the Benefits of Small Catchments on Rural Spatial Governance in Wuling Mountain Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangyang Yuan & Yuchen Yang & Ruijun Wang & Yuning Cheng, 2022. "Predicting Rural Ecological Space Boundaries in the Urban Fringe Area Based on Bayesian Network: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Jie Yin & Lili Zhao, 2024. "The Value Expression and Driving Factors of Rural Spatial Ecological Products: A Case Study of B&Bs in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Lisheng Weng & Lingzhi Tan & Yifeng Yu, 2023. "The Effects of Perceived Cultural and Tourism Public Services on Visitor Satisfaction and Quality of Life: A Multiple Mediation Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Lili Liu & Meng Chen & Pingping Luo & Maochuan Hu & Weili Duan & Ahmed Elbeltagi, 2023. "A Novel Integrated Spatiotemporal-Variable Model of Landscape Changes in Traditional Villages in the Jinshaan Gorge, Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Carsten Juergens & Fabian M. Meyer-Heß & Marcus Goebel & Torsten Schmidt, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Short-Term Economic Forecasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Xiang Li & Jiang Zhu & Tao Liu & Xiangdong Yin & Jiangchun Yao & Hao Jiang & Bing Bu & Jianlong Yan & Yixuan Li & Zhangcheng Chen, 2023. "Quota and Space Allocations of New Urban Land Supported by Urban Growth Simulations: A Case Study of Guangzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Jia Zhao & Yuluan Zhao & Xiaopiao Yang, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the Territorial Space Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Yunlu Jiang & Haotian He & Haoyu Zhang & Yuee Cao & Ge Shi & Lin Feng & Jianjun Yang, 2023. "Study on the Evolution and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of the Oasis in the Arid Area: A Case Study of the Aksu River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Zhiqing Huang & Haitao Qiu & Yonggang Cao & Adu Gong & Jiaxiang Wang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Forces of Fractional Vegetation Coverage in Xiong’an New Area of China from 2005 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Guangliang Zhou & Di Zhang & Qian Zhou & Tao Shi, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of the “Production–Living–Ecology” Space in the Yellow River Basin and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Jingeng Huo & Zhenqin Shi & Wenbo Zhu & Tianqi Li & Hua Xue & Xin Chen & Yanhui Yan & Ran Ma, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Sara Lagüera Díaz, 2023. "Urban Rural Interaction: Processes and Changes in the Marina Oriental of Cantabria (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Yichen Zhang & Chuntao Li & Lang Zhang & Jinao Liu & Ruonan Li, 2022. "Spatial Simulation of Land-Use Development of Feixi County, China, Based on Optimized Productive–Living–Ecological Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-33, May.
    14. Lijia Zhang & Zihan Zhai & Yan Zhou & Shihan Liu & Liwei Wang, 2022. "The Landscape Pattern Evolution of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines Based on Land Use in Inner Mongolia of China during 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Jiaxin Tan & Kai Wang & Chang Gan & Xuefeng Ma, 2023. "The Impacts of Tourism Development on Urban–Rural Integration: An Empirical Study Undertaken in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Kangwen Zhu & Dan Song & Lanxin Zhang & Yong He & Sheng Zhang & Yaqun Liu & Xiaosong Tian, 2023. "Evolving Trends and Influencing Factors of the Rural Green Development Level in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Gongyi Jiang & Weijun Gao & Meng Xu & Mingjia Tong & Zhonghui Liu, 2023. "Geographic Information Visualization and Sustainable Development of Low-Carbon Rural Slow Tourism under Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Xiang Li & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Yingxue Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use Impacts on Habitat Quality in Tianjin Based on the PLUS Model Coupled with the InVEST Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Weidi Zhang & Lei Wen, 2022. "An Examination of the Variables Affecting the Growth of the Tourist Sector in Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1844-:d:1039823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.