IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9590-d880457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Landscape Pattern Evolution of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines Based on Land Use in Inner Mongolia of China during 20 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Lijia Zhang

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Zihan Zhai

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Yan Zhou

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Shihan Liu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Liwei Wang

    (Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

Abstract

As the province most abundant in mineral resources in China, Inner Mongolia has more than 200 open-pit coal mines. The coal mining activities seriously hinder the sustainable use of regional land and the improvement of residents’ wellbeing. Taking 13 typical open-pit coal mines of Inner Mongolia as the study area, combining remote sensing images and the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, the trend features of spatial and temporal evolution of land use and landscape patterns from 2001 to 2020 were analyzed by transfer matrix and landscape pattern index methods. According to the mining plan and reclamation measures of the “Land Reclamation Plan”, the impacts of ecological restoration projects on land-use structure and landscape patterns were evaluated. The results showed that the following: (1) The landscape types of typical open-pit coal mining areas were mainly grassland, cropland, and industrial landscapes. The change trend of landscape pattern was obvious over the past 20 years, and the changes in grassland and mining land were relatively large, which decreased by 56.51 km 2 and increased by 60.42 km 2 , respectively. (2) Land reclamation and ecological restoration projects had positive impacts on landscape pattern changes. With the transformation from mining activities to land reclamation activities beginning in 2007, nearly 70% of the study area showed a decreasing trend in landscape fragmentation, indicating a better landscape pattern of mining area. (3) Positive policy orientation of mine ecological restoration promoted more reasonable landscape patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijia Zhang & Zihan Zhai & Yan Zhou & Shihan Liu & Liwei Wang, 2022. "The Landscape Pattern Evolution of Typical Open-Pit Coal Mines Based on Land Use in Inner Mongolia of China during 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9590-:d:880457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yafei Wang & Xiaoli Zhao & Lijun Zuo & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiao Wang & Ling Yi & Fang Liu & Jinyong Xu, 2020. "Spatial Differentiation of Land Use and Landscape Pattern Changes in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Lei Zhang & Wei Song & Wen Song, 2020. "Assessment of Agricultural Drought Risk in the Lancang-Mekong Region, South East Asia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxia Zhao & Yang Wang & Zifan Zhang & Yi Zhou & Haoqing Huang & Ming Chang, 2023. "The Evolution of Landscape Patterns and Its Ecological Effects of Open-Pit Mining: A Case Study in the Heidaigou Mining Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Ya Shao & Qinxue Xu & Xi Wei, 2023. "Progress of Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration Research Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Gül Aslı Aksu & Şermin Tağıl & Nebiye Musaoğlu & Emel Seyrek Canatanoğlu & Adnan Uzun, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Evaluation of Cultural Patterns for the Istanbul Urban Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Xinchuang Wang & Wenkai Liu & Hebing Zhang & Fenglian Lu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Land Ecological Quality and Its Obstacle Factors in the Typical Compound Area of Mine Agriculture Urban," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carsten Juergens & Fabian M. Meyer-Heß & Marcus Goebel & Torsten Schmidt, 2021. "Remote Sensing for Short-Term Economic Forecasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Jia Zhao & Yuluan Zhao & Xiaopiao Yang, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the Territorial Space Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Wen Song & Shisong Cao & Mingyi Du & You Mo & Suju Li, 2022. "Investigation of compound drought risk and driving factors in Nepal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1365-1391, November.
    4. Huang Yu & Shanshan Du & Jingqiu Zhang & Jinglei Chen, 2023. "Spatial Evolution and Multi-Scenario Simulation of Rural “Production–Ecological–Living” Space: A Case Study for Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Indrajit Pal & Ganesh Dhungana & Ayush Baskota & Parmeshwar Udmale & Mayuri Ashokrao Gadhawe & Puvadol Doydee & Tanh T. N. Nguyen & Seak Sophat, 2023. "Multi-Hazard Livelihood Security and Resilience of Lower Mekong Basin Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Yining Ma & Suri Guga & Jie Xu & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Xingpeng Liu, 2021. "Comprehensive Risk Assessment of High Temperature Disaster to Kiwifruit in Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9590-:d:880457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.