IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4920-d1093795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Evolution and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of the Oasis in the Arid Area: A Case Study of the Aksu River Basin in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yunlu Jiang

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Haotian He

    (Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    College of Life and Geographic Sciences, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Haoyu Zhang

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yuee Cao

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    College of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

  • Ge Shi

    (School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Lin Feng

    (School of Humanities and Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)

  • Jianjun Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

Abstract

To achieve high-quality sustainable development in arid areas based on the concept of ecological civilization, it is necessary to deeply study the territorial spatial structure characteristics. Taking the Aksu River Basin, an important ecological security barrier in northwest China, as an example, this paper follows the research idea of “feature analysis-suitability evaluation-conflict identification analysis-optimization” and constructs a comprehensive model based on the AHP-entropy weight comprehensive evaluation method, ArcGIS spatial identification analysis, variance coefficient-TOPSIS method, and NRCA. A comprehensive model based on the AHP-entropy power integrated evaluation method, ArcGIS spatial identification analysis, variance coefficient-TOPSIS method, and NRCA was constructed to guide the optimization of the territorial spatial layout by exploring the characteristics of territorial spatial pattern, the suitability of territorial spatial development, the identification of territorial spatial conflicts, and the efficiency and functional advantage of territorial spatial utilization in the study area. The results show that: (1) The spatial type of territorial space in the Aksu River Basin from 2000 to 2020 is dominated by ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space, and the three spatial boundaries are irregularly interlaced. (2) The spatial utilization conflict pattern of the Aksu River Basin has formed, and the general conflict area is overgrowing. (3) The overall efficiency of territorial utilization in the Aksu River Basin is low, with significant differences among county administrative units. (4) After optimization, the three types of space in the watershed are adjusted and refined into six functional areas: basic farmland protection area, rural development area, ecological protection red line area, ecological control area, urban development area, and industrial supporting construction area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunlu Jiang & Haotian He & Haoyu Zhang & Yuee Cao & Ge Shi & Lin Feng & Jianjun Yang, 2023. "Study on the Evolution and Optimization of the Spatial Structure of the Oasis in the Arid Area: A Case Study of the Aksu River Basin in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4920-:d:1093795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne Geissler & Abraham Arevalo-Arizaga & David Radlbauer & Peter Wallisch, 2022. "Linking the National Energy and Climate Plan with Municipal Spatial Planning and Supporting Sustainable Investment in Renewable Energy Sources in Austria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Tianyi Zhao & Yuning Cheng & Yiyang Fan & Xiangnan Fan, 2022. "Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Zander, P. & Kachele, H., 1999. "Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 311-325, March.
    4. Zhuxiao Yu & Erqi Xu & Hongqi Zhang & Erping Shang, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Coordination and Conflict of Production-Living-Ecology Land Functions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Fu, Jingying & Bu, Ziqiang & Jiang, Dong & Lin, Gang & Li, Xiang, 2022. "Sustainable land use diagnosis based on the perspective of production–living–ecological spaces in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Qing Liu & Zengzeng Su & Weihao Huang, 2022. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of the High-Quality Utilization of Territorial Space Based on the Perspective of Spatial Equilibrium: A Case Study of Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Li, Sinan & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian & Tan, Kun, 2021. "Optimize and control territorial spatial functional areas to improve the ecological stability and total environment in karst areas of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Gordon F. Mulligan, 1984. "Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A Review of the Literature," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 1-42, September.
    11. Reh, Wolfgang & Scheffler, Bernard, 1996. "Significance tests and confidence intervals for coefficients of variation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 449-452, August.
    12. Furui Xi & Runping Wang & Jusong Shi & Jinde Zhang & Yang Yu & Na Wang & Zhiyi Wang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Conflict Identification of Production–Living–Ecological Space in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Karen C. Seto & Robert K. Kaufmann, 2003. "Modeling the Drivers of Urban Land Use Change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating Remote Sensing with Socioeconomic Data," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(1), pages 106-121.
    14. Shilei Wang & Yanbo Qu & Weiying Zhao & Mei Guan & Zongli Ping, 2022. "Evolution and Optimization of Territorial-Space Structure Based on Regional Function Orientation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Rokhsareh Khashtabeh & Morteza Akbari & Mahdi Kolahi & Ali Talebanfard, 2021. "Assessing the effects of desertification control projects using socio-economic indicators in the arid regions of eastern Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10455-10469, July.
    16. Ran Yu & Yan Qin & Yuting Xu & Xiaowei Chuai, 2022. "Study on the Optimization of Territory Spatial “Urban–Agricultural–Ecological” Pattern Based on the Improvement of “Production–Living–Ecological” Function under Carbon Constraint," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Abbas Mardani & Zenonas Turskis & Ahmad Jusoh & Khalil MD Nor, 2016. "Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 645-682, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zuo & Li, Jiaming, 2022. "Spatial suitability and multi-scenarios for land use: Simulation and policy insights from the production-living-ecological perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Ning Xu & Wanxu Chen & Sipei Pan & Jiale Liang & Jiaojiao Bian, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space in China: Perspective of Main Function Zones," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Niu, Hebin & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Liu, Biao, 2023. "Identification and management of land use conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Shuozhou in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Dinghua Ou & Qi Zhang & Yijie Wu & Jing Qin & Jianguo Xia & Ouping Deng & Xuesong Gao & Jinhu Bian & Shangqi Gong, 2021. "Construction of a Territorial Space Classification System Based on Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Land Use and Its Superior Territorial Space Functions and Their Dynamic Coupling: Case Study on Qiong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.
    6. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Yuchun Wang & Xiaoyan Lu & Jie Zhang & Yunfeng Ruan & Bingyi Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distributions of Multiple Land Use Functions and Their Coupling Coordination Degree in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Ze Yu & Desheng Su & Shilei Wang & Chuanchen Wei & Na Li & Yanbo Qu & Meng Wang, 2023. "Dynamic Matching and Spatial Optimization of Land Use and Resource-Environment Constraints in Typical Regions of the Yellow River Basin in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Ziwei Luo & Xijun Hu & Yezi Wang & Cunyou Chen, 2023. "Simulation and Prediction of Territorial Spatial Layout at the Lake-Type Basin Scale: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Basin in China from 2000 to 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow Ri," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Yingxian Deng & Ren Yang, 2021. "Influence Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space Changes in the Urbanization Process of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Jiuyi Li, 2022. "Evaluation Methods for Water Resource Suitability in Territorial Spatial Planning: A Case Study of Baiyin City in a Semi-Arid Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    14. Chau, Nancy H. & Qin, Yu & Zhang, Weiwen, 2015. "Networked Leaders in the Shadow of the Market – A Chinese Experiment in Allocating Land Conversion Rights," Working Papers 250022, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    15. Mehdi Sheikh Goodarzi & Yousef Sakieh & Shabnam Navardi, 2017. "Scenario-based urban growth allocation in a rapidly developing area: a modeling approach for sustainability analysis of an urban-coastal coupled system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1103-1126, June.
    16. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    17. David Hidalgo García & Julián Arco Díaz & Adelaida Martín Martín & Emilio Gómez Cobos, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Thermal Effects Caused by Heat Waves through Remote Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    19. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4920-:d:1093795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.