IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1447-d903938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the Territorial Space Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Zhao

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Yuluan Zhao

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
    The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China)

  • Xiaopiao Yang

    (School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
    The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China)

Abstract

Scientific understanding of the evolution law of territorial space patterns and the ability to reveal the formation mechanism hold great significance for the sustainable utilization of territorial resources and the high-quality green development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB). In this study, we used the spatial chord diagram, landscape pattern index, and geographical probe to explore the evolution characteristics and formation mechanism of the territorial space pattern of the YREB from 2000 to 2020. The results showed the following: (1) The territorial space showed obvious geographical hierarchical distribution characteristics in the topographic gradient. Production and living space was dominant throughout the low and middle terrain region. Ecological space was dominant throughout the high-terrain regions. With the increase of altitude and slope, production and living space contracted, whereas ecological space areas expanded. (2) Since 2000, the territorial space has changed more dramatically. Over time, living space tended to increase, and production and ecological space tended to decrease, but ecological space was always dominant. In space, the geographical differentiation of territorial space was more obvious, and the pattern was relatively stable, with production space distributed primarily in the middle and lower reaches, living space distributed primarily in the lower reaches, and ecological space distributed primarily in the middle and upper reaches. The inter-transformation between territorial spaces was more frequent, and the transformation trajectory was diversified. (3) The fragmentation, heterogeneity, and dispersion of territorial space landscape patches throughout the whole region increased, and the balance and diversity of territorial space utilization improved. (4) Natural factors have continued to weaken the intensity of their effect on territorial space. Human factors gradually increased the extent of their interference in the territorial space. There are significant differences in the extent of the role of these different factors on the territorial space of the whole region and each basin. Natural and human factors jointly promoted the formation and development of the territorial space pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Zhao & Yuluan Zhao & Xiaopiao Yang, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the Territorial Space Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1447-:d:903938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1447/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1447/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bowen Chen & Changyan Wu & Xianjin Huang & Xuefeng Yang, 2020. "Examining the Relationship between Urban Land Expansion and Economic Linkage Using Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Lovell, Sarah Taylor & DeSantis, S'ra & Nathan, Chloe A. & Olson, Meryl Breton & Ernesto Méndez, V. & Kominami, Hisashi C. & Erickson, Daniel L. & Morris, Katlyn S. & Morris, William B., 2010. "Integrating agroecology and landscape multifunctionality in Vermont: An evolving framework to evaluate the design of agroecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 327-341, June.
    3. Kertész, Ádám & Nagy, Loránd Attila & Balázs, Boglárka, 2019. "Effect of land use change on ecosystem services in Lake Balaton Catchment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 430-438.
    4. Haozhe Zhang & Qingyuan Yang & Huiming Zhang & Lulu Zhou & Hongji Chen, 2021. "Optimization of Land Use Based on the Source and Sink Landscape of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fengdu County in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Yafei Wang & Xiaoli Zhao & Lijun Zuo & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiao Wang & Ling Yi & Fang Liu & Jinyong Xu, 2020. "Spatial Differentiation of Land Use and Landscape Pattern Changes in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Yingxian Deng & Ren Yang, 2021. "Influence Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space Changes in the Urbanization Process of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Renfeng Ma & Jiarui Chen & Qi Pan & Yuxian Cheng & Weiqin Wang & Baoyu Zhu & Jingwu Ma & Jiaming Li, 2022. "How Should the Effectiveness of Marine Functional Zoning in China Be Evaluated? Taking Wenzhou Marine Functional Zoning as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Ouyang, Xiao & Xu, Jun & Li, Jiayu & Wei, Xiao & Li, Yonghui, 2022. "Land space optimization of urban-agriculture-ecological functions in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Duan, Yaming & Wang, Hui & Huang, An & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Longhui & Ji, Zhengxin, 2021. "Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Negasi Solomon & Hadgu Hishe & Ted Annang & Opoku Pabi & Isaac K Asante & Emiru Birhane, 2018. "Forest Cover Change, Key Drivers and Community Perception in Wujig Mahgo Waren Forest of Northern Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Baopeng Xie & Quanxi Wang & Beiying Huang & Ying Chen & Jie Yang & Peixin Qi, 2022. "Coordinated State Analysis and Differential Regulation of Territorial Spatial Functions in Underdeveloped Regions: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Tian Liang & Fei Yang & Yinchen Luo & Mengying Fang & Xi Huang & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen & Xiaohong Ren, 2022. "The Synchronous Development Pattern and Type Division of Functional Coupling Coordination and Human Activity Intensity Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Perspective: A Case Study of Wa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Guangliang Zhou & Di Zhang & Qian Zhou & Tao Shi, 2022. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of the “Production–Living–Ecology” Space in the Yellow River Basin and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Toru Sakai & Emiru Birhane & Buruh Abebe & Destaalem Gebremeskel, 2021. "Applicability of Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry on Forest Measurement in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Chi, Yuan & Liu, Dahai & Wang, Jing & Wang, Enkang, 2020. "Human negative, positive, and net influences on an estuarine area with intensive human activity based on land covers and ecological indices: An empirical study in Chongming Island, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Wanxu Chen & Guangqing Chi & Jiangfeng Li, 2020. "Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou, 2023. "Delineation of Urban Growth Boundary Based on Habitat Quality and Carbon Storage: A Case Study of Weiyuan County in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Ilaria Zambon & Artemi Cerdà & Sirio Cividino & Luca Salvati, 2019. "The (Evolving) Vineyard’s Age Structure in the Valencian Community, Spain: A New Demographic Approach for Rural Development and Landscape Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Sèyi Fridaïus Ulrich Vanvanhossou & Luc Hippolyte Dossa & Sven König, 2021. "Sustainable Management of Animal Genetic Resources to Improve Low-Input Livestock Production: Insights into Local Beninese Cattle Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Horacio Augstburger & Fabian Käser & Stephan Rist, 2019. "Assessing Food Systems and Their Impact on Common Pool Resources and Resilience," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Makovníková Jarmila & Pálka Boris & Kološta Stanislav & Flaška Filip & Orságová Katarína & Spišiaková Mária, 2020. "Non-Monetary Assessment and Mapping of the Potential of Agroecosystem Services in Rural Slovakia," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 257-276, June.
    16. Ma, Wen & Fang, Zhuoqiong & Zhang, Xiangfeng, 2023. "Comparative analysis of structural characteristics of China's 18 typical urban agglomerations based on flows of various elements," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    17. Sumaryanto & Sri Hery Susilowati & Fitri Nurfatriani & Herlina Tarigan & Erwidodo & Tahlim Sudaryanto & Henri Wira Perkasa, 2022. "Determinants of Farmers’ Behavior towards Land Conservation Practices in the Upper Citarum Watershed in West Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Yingzi Chen & Yaqi Hu & Lina Lai, 2022. "Demography-Oriented Urban Spatial Matching of Service Facilities: Case Study of Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Dilnessa Gashaye & Zerihun Woldu & Sileshi Nemomissa & Enyew Adgo, 2023. "The Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes in the Este District, South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia, in the Last Four Decades (the 1980s to 2020s)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Zhongshun Gong & Ye Yuan & Lu Qie & Sihua Huang & Xuefeng Xie & Rui Zhong & Lijie Pu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Coupling Coordination Relationship of the Production–Living–Ecological Function at County Scale: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1447-:d:903938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.