IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15533-d1272535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban-Wetland Equitable Planning Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana C. Giurgiu

    (SeaCities Lab, Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Joerg Baumeister

    (SeaCities Lab, Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Paul Burton

    (Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia)

Abstract

This paper presents the design, development, and testing of an interactive planning tool for urban-wetland systems. The tool targets initial architectural and urban design stages, enabling a broader understanding of natural-urban synergies, ecosystem services, and sustainable systemic design strategies for water management, energy efficiency, on-site food production, community, coastal protection, and security. Targeting a test study site in Queensland, Australia, this paper aims to establish proof of concept for the tool algorithm used to calculate quantitative values for each sub-system and two novel system assessment criteria: ‘fair share’ (FS) and benefit cost (BC) ratio. The FS criterion is based on the permaculture FS ethical principle and tracks system diversity, resilience, and self-sustenance. The BC criterion builds on cost-benefit valuation methods but includes non-market values, providing a holistic assessment of system costs and benefits, including ecosystem services. Good practise (GP) and best practise (BP) design scenarios are developed for this study site and compared against a business-as-usual (BAU) case. Results demonstrate the relevance of FS and BC as assessment criteria to aid in the development of sustainable designs. Compared to the BAU scenario, the GP and BP scenario BC ratios increased 12 and 14 times, respectively. Yearly cost of living reductions for GP were equivalent to 26,990 AUD per site inhabitant, with BP resulting in a negative yearly cost of living (a yearly benefit equivalent to 6420 AUD per site inhabitant). The use of the FS and BC assessment criteria and tool highlights a potential new approach to planning and development processes, integrating aspects currently omitted within planning requirements and assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana C. Giurgiu & Joerg Baumeister & Paul Burton, 2023. "Urban-Wetland Equitable Planning Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-54, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15533-:d:1272535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karimi Estahbanati, M.R. & Feilizadeh, Mehrzad & Jafarpur, Khosrow & Feilizadeh, Mansoor & Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza, 2015. "Experimental investigation of a multi-effect active solar still: The effect of the number of stages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 46-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feilizadeh, Mansoor & Karimi Estahbanati, M.R. & Jafarpur, Khosrow & Roostaazad, Reza & Feilizadeh, Mehrzad & Taghvaei, Hamed, 2015. "Year-round outdoor experiments on a multi-stage active solar still with different numbers of solar collectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 39-46.
    2. Dumka, Pankaj & Mishra, Dhananjay R., 2018. "Experimental investigation of modified single slope solar still integrated with earth (I) &(II):Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1144-1157.
    3. Abdessemed, Amina & Bougriou, Cherif & Guerraiche, Djemaa & Abachi, Rabah, 2019. "Effects of tray shape of a multi-stage solar still coupled to a parabolic concentrating solar collector in Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1134-1140.
    4. Lee, Ga-Ram & Park, Chang-Dae & Lim, Hyuneui & Cho, Sung-Hoon & Choi, Seok-Min & Lim, Byung-Ju, 2023. "Performance enhancement of a diffusion-type solar still: Wettability and flowability of condensation surface," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 277-285.
    5. Chen, W.L. & Xie, G., 2022. "Performance of multi-stage tubular solar still operating under vacuum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 34-46.
    6. Arunkumar, T. & Raj, Kaiwalya & Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D. & Denkenberger, David & Tingting, Guo & Xuan, Li & Velraj, R., 2019. "A review of efficient high productivity solar stills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 197-220.
    7. Bait, Omar & Si–Ameur, Mohamed, 2016. "Numerical investigation of a multi-stage solar still under Batna climatic conditions: Effect of radiation term on mass and heat energy balances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 308-323.
    8. Sharshir, S.W. & Peng, Guilong & Wu, Lirong & Essa, F.A. & Kabeel, A.E. & Yang, Nuo, 2017. "The effects of flake graphite nanoparticles, phase change material, and film cooling on the solar still performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 358-366.
    9. Zanganeh, Peyman & Goharrizi, Ataallah Soltani & Ayatollahi, Shahab & Feilizadeh, Mehrzad & Dashti, Hossein, 2020. "Efficiency improvement of solar stills through wettability alteration of the condensation surface: An experimental study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Shoeibi, Shahin & Rahbar, Nader & Abedini Esfahlani, Ahad & Kargarsharifabad, Hadi, 2020. "Application of simultaneous thermoelectric cooling and heating to improve the performance of a solar still: An experimental study and exergy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    11. Gang, Wu & Qichang, Yang & Hongfei, Zheng & Yi, Zhang & Hui, Fang & Rihui, Jin, 2019. "Direct utilization of solar linear Fresnel reflector on multi-effect eccentric horizontal tubular still with falling film," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 170-184.
    12. Morciano, Matteo & Fasano, Matteo & Bergamasco, Luca & Albiero, Alessandro & Lo Curzio, Mario & Asinari, Pietro & Chiavazzo, Eliodoro, 2020. "Sustainable freshwater production using passive membrane distillation and waste heat recovery from portable generator sets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Karimi Estahbanati, M.R. & Ahsan, Amimul & Feilizadeh, Mehrzad & Jafarpur, Khosrow & Ashrafmansouri, Seyedeh-Saba & Feilizadeh, Mansoor, 2016. "Theoretical and experimental investigation on internal reflectors in a single-slope solar still," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 537-547.
    14. Feilizadeh, Mansoor & Estahbanati, M.R. Karimi & Khorram, Mohammad & Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza, 2019. "Experimental investigation of an active thermosyphon solar still with enhanced condenser," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 328-334.
    15. Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D. & Arulvel, S. & Anil Kumar, V. & Davies, P.A. & Arunkumar, T. & Sathyamurthy, Ravishankar & Kabeel, A.E. & Anand Vishwanath, M. & Sai Charan Reddy, D. & Dutta, Amandeep & Agr, 2022. "Combined effects of composite thermal energy storage and magnetic field to enhance productivity in solar desalination," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 219-234.
    16. Li, Shuang-Fei & Liu, Zhen-Hua & Shao, Zhi-Xiong & Xiao, Hong-shen & Xia, Ning, 2018. "Performance study on a passive solar seawater desalination system using multi-effect heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 343-352.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15533-:d:1272535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.