IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14436-d1252794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Regain Green Consumer Trust after Greenwashing: Experimental Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Wang

    (International Business School, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China)

  • Thomas Walker

    (Department of Finance, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3H 0AI, Canada)

Abstract

Greenwashing leads to consumer skepticism of all green products as well as doubts about company claims regarding sustainability. However, the understanding of how to regain green consumer trust after greenwashing is rather limited. The authors fill this gap by exploring the psychological process of green consumers following intervention strategies designed to reduce greenwashing. We collect and interpret quantitative data from two psychological experiments, the first experiment identified two types of intervention strategies that serve to counter the negative impact of greenwashing and based on our findings from the first studies, we proposed and tested the moderating effect of two factors—implicit beliefs of consumers and companies who implement intervention strategies after greenwashing. The results indicate that distrust regulation (quantifying a product’s green attributes) and trustworthiness demonstration (visualizing environmental behaviors) are effective intervention strategies that can enable consumers to re-evaluate the cost-benefit of green products, and which may serve as critical psychological factors for green consumers and contribute to the degree of trust. Validation and comparative study of the derived results show that distrust regulation, followed by trustworthiness demonstration, has the best effect on increasing green trust after intervention. If the sequence is reversed, the effect of the intervention strategy is worse than if only one strategy had been applied. The implicit beliefs of green consumers play a moderating role between intervention strategies and reconsideration of the cost-benefit of green products. The behavior of genuinely green companies and the incremental beliefs of consumers can promote the intervention effect after greenwashing. Alternatively, the behavior of greenwashing companies can easily counter these effects. These findings contribute to knowledge about which psychological factors can promote or hinder the effectiveness of an intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Wang & Thomas Walker, 2023. "How to Regain Green Consumer Trust after Greenwashing: Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14436-:d:1252794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jundong Hou & Chi Zhang & Robert Allen King, 2018. "Measuring trust damage in nonprofit marketing: the role of cognitive and emotional perceptions," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(1), pages 25-47, March.
    2. Rui Guo & Lan Tao & Caroline Bingxin Li & Tao Wang, 2017. "A Path Analysis of Greenwashing in a Trust Crisis Among Chinese Energy Companies: The Role of Brand Legitimacy and Brand Loyalty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 523-536, February.
    3. Alastair Iles, 2008. "Shifting to green chemistry: the need for innovations in sustainability marketing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(8), pages 524-535, December.
    4. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 489-500, May.
    5. Paul Hart & Carol Saunders, 1997. "Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 23-42, February.
    6. Yu‐Shan Chen, 2013. "Towards green loyalty: driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(5), pages 294-308, September.
    7. Aristeidis Theotokis & Emmanouela Manganari, 2015. "The Impact of Choice Architecture on Sustainable Consumer Behavior: The Role of Guilt," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 423-437, October.
    8. Kim, Peter H. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2013. "Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 1-14.
    9. Laufer, Daniel & Coombs, W. Timothy, 2006. "How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 379-385.
    10. Kim, Peter H. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2006. "When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 49-65, January.
    11. Nakayachi, Kazuya & Watabe, Motoki, 2005. "Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary "Hostage Posting" on trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Yu-Shan Chen, 2010. "The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 307-319, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Adil & Eden Samuel Parthiban & Haitham A. Mahmoud & Jei-Zheng Wu & Mohd Sadiq & Fatima Suhail, 2024. "Consumers’ Reaction to Greenwashing in the Saudi Arabian Skincare Market: A Moderated Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    2. Prasad Siba Borah & Courage Simon Kofi Dogbe & Nyankomo Marwa, 2024. "Generation Z's green purchase behavior: Do green consumer knowledge, consumer social responsibility, green advertising, and green consumer trust matter for sustainable development?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4530-4546, July.
    3. Yu-Shan Chen & Shu-Tzu Hung & Ting-Yu Wang & A-Fen Huang & Yen-Wen Liao, 2017. "The Influence of Excessive Product Packaging on Green Brand Attachment: The Mediation Roles of Green Brand Attitude and Green Brand Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Ying Lin & Chia-Sui Weng, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental Friendliness on Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Satisfaction and Green Perceived Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Tser-Yieth Chen & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "Dual Pathways of Value Endorsement in Green Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Sheng-Hsiung Chang, 2015. "The Influence of Green Viral Communications on Green Purchase Intentions: The Mediating Role of Consumers’ Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Patrizia de Luca & Gabriella Schoier & Alice Vessio, 2017. "Cause-Related Marketing and Trust: Empirical Evidence on Pinkwashing," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 51-73.
    8. Zhimin Zhou & Fucheng Zheng & Jialing Lin & Nan Zhou, 2021. "The interplay among green brand knowledge, expected eudaimonic well‐being and environmental consciousness on green brand purchase intention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 630-639, March.
    9. Lin, Jialing & Lobo, Antonio & Leckie, Civilai, 2017. "The role of benefits and transparency in shaping consumers’ green perceived value, self-brand connection and brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 133-141.
    10. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Akagün Ergin, Elif & Simic, Vladimir & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A neutrosophic WENSLO-ARLON model for measuring sustainable brand equity performance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Alyson Byrne & Julian Barling & Kathryne Dupré, 2014. "Leader Apologies and Employee and Leader Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 91-106, April.
    14. Bob Fennis & Wolfgang Stroebe, 2014. "Softening the Blow: Company Self-Disclosure of Negative Information Lessens Damaging Effects on Consumer Judgment and Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 109-120, March.
    15. Lili Wan, 2016. "Tactics to Restore Damaged Customer Relationship after Negative Events," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(6), pages 132-137, June.
    16. Rizzi, Francesco & Gigliotti, Marina & Runfola, Andrea & Ferrucci, Luca, 2022. "Don't miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Nils Christian Hoffmann & Juelin Yin & Stefan Hoffmann, 2020. "Chain of Blame: A Multi-country Study of Consumer Reactions Towards Supplier Hypocrisy in Global Supply Chains," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 247-286, April.
    18. Hornsey, Matthew J. & Chapman, Cassandra M. & La Macchia, Stephen & Loakes, Jennifer, 2024. "Corporate apologies are effective because reform signals are weighted more heavily than culpability signals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. Chiou‐Fong Wei & Chang‐Tang Chiang & Tun‐Chih Kou & Bruce C Y Lee, 2017. "Toward Sustainable Livelihoods: Investigating the Drivers of Purchase Behavior for Green Products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 626-639, July.
    20. Pankaj Tiwari, 2023. "Influence of the Green Brand Image on the Green Word of Mouth of Millennials: a Mediation Study on Banks," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 59-78, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14436-:d:1252794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.