IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13132-d1230221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Debris Flow Impact Based on Experimental Analysis along a Deposition Area

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Khairi A.Wahab

    (School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol

    (River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Centre (REDAC), Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Jazaul Ikhsan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55183, Indonesia)

  • Mohd Hafiz Zawawi

    (College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Bandar Baru Bangi 43650, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohamad Aizat Abas

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Norazian Mohamed Noor

    (Centre of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Faculty of Civil Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia)

  • Norizham Abdul Razak

    (School of Aerospace Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Moh Sholichin

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang 65145, Indonesia)

Abstract

Debris flow is a devastating phenomenon that happens in hilly and mountainous regions and has a serious impact on affected areas. It causes casualties and serious damage to the environment and society. Therefore, a susceptible assessment is necessary to prevent, mitigate, and raise awareness of the impact of debris flows. This paper focuses on evaluating the deposition area along the deposition board. The methodology involved an experiment on a physical model by demonstrating the debris flow based on the steepness of the flume slope at 15°, 20°, and 25° angles. The limestone particles with a total volume of 2.5 × 10 6 mm 3 acted as debris and were released with water from the tank to the deposition board with an area of 10 × 10 5 mm 2 . The volume, area, and length of particle distribution carried from the flume to the deposition board were then determined. Based on the experimental results, the deposition board is covered with particles of about 696.19 × 10 3 mm 3 , 748.29 × 10 3 mm 3 , and 505.19 × 10 3 mm 3 volume for each 15°, 20°, and 25° angle, respectively. In actual situations, debris flow is capable of causing significant risk to the affected area. This study can be deemed useful for a risk assessment approach, to help develop guidelines, and to mitigate the regions where debris flows are most probable to occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Khairi A.Wahab & Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol & Jazaul Ikhsan & Mohd Hafiz Zawawi & Mohamad Aizat Abas & Norazian Mohamed Noor & Norizham Abdul Razak & Moh Sholichin, 2023. "Assessment of Debris Flow Impact Based on Experimental Analysis along a Deposition Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13132-:d:1230221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Wang & Guangqi Chen & Zheng Han & Suhua Zhou & Hong Zhang & Peideng Jing, 2016. "3D numerical simulation of debris-flow motion using SPH method incorporating non-Newtonian fluid behavior," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(3), pages 1981-1998, April.
    2. P. J. Talling & R. B. Wynn & D. G. Masson & M. Frenz & B. T. Cronin & R. Schiebel & A. M. Akhmetzhanov & S. Dallmeier-Tiessen & S. Benetti & P. P. E. Weaver & A. Georgiopoulou & C. Zühlsdorff & L. A. , 2007. "Onset of submarine debris flow deposition far from original giant landslide," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7169), pages 541-544, November.
    3. Edgar Jr. Joe & Felix Tongkul & Rodeano Roslee, 2018. "Engineering Properties Of Debris Flow Material At Bundu Tuhan, Ranau, Sabah, Malaysia," Pakistan Journal of Geology (PJG), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 22-26, August.
    4. Der-Guey Lin & Sen-Yen Hsu & Kuang-Tsung Chang, 2009. "Numerical simulations of flow motion and deposition characteristics of granular debris flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(3), pages 623-650, September.
    5. M. Jakob & D. Stein & M. Ulmi, 2012. "Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 241-261, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nisar Ali Shah & Muhammad Shafique & Muhammad Ishfaq & Kamil Faisal & Mark Van der Meijde, 2023. "Integrated Approach for Landslide Risk Assessment Using Geoinformation Tools and Field Data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Michalis Diakakis & Spyridon Mavroulis & Emmanuel Vassilakis & Vassiliki Chalvatzi, 2023. "Exploring the Application of a Debris Flow Likelihood Regression Model in Mediterranean Post-Fire Environments, Using Field Observations-Based Validation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    4. Morteza T. Marvi, 2020. "A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 967-995, July.
    5. R. Vázquez & J. L. Macías & J. Alcalá-Reygosa & J. L. Arce & A. Jiménez-Haro & S. Fernández & T. Carlón & R. Saucedo & J. M. Sánchez-Núñez, 2022. "Numerical modeling and hazard implications of landslides at the Ardillas Volcanic Dome (Tacaná Volcanic Complex, Mexico-Guatemala)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1305-1333, September.
    6. Zhifei Deng & Jifu Liu & Lanlan Guo & Jiaoyang Li & Junming Li & Yiru Jia, 2021. "Pure risk premium rating of debris flows based on a dynamic run-out model: a case study in Anzhou, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 235-253, March.
    7. Hualin Cheng & Zhiyi Chen & Yu Huang, 2022. "Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(2), pages 1567-1587, June.
    8. Badri Shrestha & Hajime Nakagawa & Kenji Kawaike & Yasuyuki Baba & Hao Zhang, 2012. "Driftwood deposition from debris flows at slit-check dams and fans," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(2), pages 577-602, March.
    9. Jiangcheng Huang & Huijuan Xu & Xingwu Duan & Xu Li & Peijia Wang, 2020. "Activity patterns and controlling factors of debris flows in the Upper Salween Alpine Valley," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1367-1383, August.
    10. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    11. Ahmet Ozan Celik & Volkan Kiricci & Canberk Insel, 2017. "Reassessment of the flood damage at a river diversion hydropower plant site: lessons learned from a case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(2), pages 833-847, March.
    12. Yifei Cui & Clarence E. Choi & Luis H. D. Liu & Charles W. W. Ng, 2018. "Effects of particle size of mono-disperse granular flows impacting a rigid barrier," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1179-1201, April.
    13. Konstantinos Karagiorgos & Micha Heiser & Thomas Thaler & Johannes Hübl & Sven Fuchs, 2016. "Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 1091-1107, November.
    14. Mingzhe Zhang & Bao Zhou & Qiangong Cheng & Lingkai Shen & Aiguo Xing & Yu Zhuang, 2021. "Investigation of the triggering mechanism and runout characteristics of an earthflow in Zhimei village, Chengduo, Qinghai, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 903-929, October.
    15. Kevin McCoy & Vitaliy Krasko & Paul Santi & Daniel Kaffine & Steffen Rebennack, 2016. "Minimizing economic impacts from post-fire debris flows in the western United States," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 149-176, August.
    16. Ioannis Kougkoulos & Simon J. Cook & Laura A. Edwards & Leon J. Clarke & Elias Symeonakis & Jason M. Dortch & Kathleen Nesbitt, 2018. "Modelling glacial lake outburst flood impacts in the Bolivian Andes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1415-1438, December.
    17. Christoph Rheinberger & Hans E. Romang & Michael Bründl, 2013. "Proportional loss functions for debris flow events," Post-Print hal-02643847, HAL.
    18. Rui Li & Yuliang Teng, 2022. "An improved DebrisInterMixingFoam for debris flow simulation: numerical investigation and application," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(3), pages 1925-1947, September.
    19. Mudassir Ali Khan & Zahiraniza Mustaffa & Indra Sati Hamonangan Harahap & Muhammad Bello Ibrahim & Mohamed Ezzat Al-Atroush, 2022. "Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13132-:d:1230221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.