IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10293-d1182733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Consumption of Retrofitting Existing Public Buildings in Malaysia under BIM Approach: Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nawal Abdunasseer Hmidah

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Nuzul Azam Bin Haron

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Aidi Alias Hizami

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Teik Hua Law

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Abubaker Basheer Abdalwhab Altohami

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) platforms to enhance design and construction processes have been rising recently, with BIM-based tools such as Autodesk Revit’s Architecture. The importance of BIM can be mainly seen in reducing energy consumption by at least 30%, leading to a huge cut in carbon dioxide, and saving the environment. BIM helps engineers and contractors to use less material for better benefits for stakeholders, including organizations, governmental offices, and businesses. This study investigates the reliability and validity of a constructed questionnaire to pre-determine the applications relevant to a questionnaire to be used in a large-scale study. The literature has highlighted the connection between BIM and energy-driven retrofits. However, the application of BIM to the retrofitting of existing structures confronts obstacles, which may be attributable to the multidisciplinary character of information sharing, the timeliness of communication, and the large number of technology components required to provide an optimal exchange. A pilot study was conducted, identifying the sample size of 30 random respondents out of 167 samples. SPSS was used for estimating the percentages of the demographic attributes for the respondents, the face validity, internal-consistency validity, the validation of all contracts, and Pearson’s correlation. The results show that engineers constitute 46%, project managers (20%), contractors (17%), and the rest (approximately 17%) are divided among other professionals. The validity of internal consistency ranges from 0.791 to 0.912, which reflects perfect consistency. The internal consistency of each part was recorded at 0.942 (energy), 0.957 (strategies), and 0.979 (framework). The validation for the energy part ranges from 0.610 to 0.912; for strategies (0.451 to 0.884,) and for the framework (0.681 to 0.884). Pearson’s correlation for all 17 questions showed a minimum value of 0.464, while the maximum value was 0.890. The results show that all questionnaire elements were successfully validated with a Cronbach alpha factor mainly higher than 0.6—the threshold accepted by most researchers. Hence, the work on the broader scale of testing and analysis could proceed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nawal Abdunasseer Hmidah & Nuzul Azam Bin Haron & Aidi Alias Hizami & Teik Hua Law & Abubaker Basheer Abdalwhab Altohami, 2023. "Energy Consumption of Retrofitting Existing Public Buildings in Malaysia under BIM Approach: Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10293-:d:1182733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abanda, F.H. & Byers, L., 2016. "An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 517-527.
    2. Xin Liang & Geoffrey Qiping Shen & Li Guo, 2015. "Improving Management of Green Retrofits from a Stakeholder Perspective: A Case Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Li, Y. & Kubicki, S. & Guerriero, A. & Rezgui, Y., 2019. "Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Mendizabal, Maddalen & Heidrich, Oliver & Feliu, Efren & García-Blanco, Gemma & Mendizabal, Alaitz, 2018. "Stimulating urban transition and transformation to achieve sustainable and resilient cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 410-418.
    5. Mustapha Mukhtar & Bismark Ameyaw & Nasser Yimen & Quixin Zhang & Olusola Bamisile & Humphrey Adun & Mustafa Dagbasi, 2021. "Building Retrofit and Energy Conservation/Efficiency Review: A Techno-Environ-Economic Assessment of Heat Pump System Retrofit in Housing Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marvuglia, Antonino & Havinga, Lisanne & Heidrich, Oliver & Fonseca, Jimeno & Gaitani, Niki & Reckien, Diana, 2020. "Advances and challenges in assessing urban sustainability: an advanced bibliometric review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Xun Liu & Zhenhan Ding & Xiaobo Li & Zhiyuan Xue, 2023. "Research Progress, Hotspots, and Trends of Using BIM to Reduce Building Energy Consumption: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Parupudi, Ranga Vihari & Singh, Harjit & Kolokotroni, Maria, 2020. "Low Concentrating Photovoltaics (LCPV) for buildings and their performance analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Jinhui Ma & Haijing Huang & Mingxi Peng & Yihuan Zhou, 2024. "Investigating the Heterogeneity Effects of Urban Morphology on Building Energy Consumption from a Spatio-Temporal Perspective Using Old Residential Buildings on a University Campus," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Parupudi, Ranga Vihari & Singh, Harjit & Kolokotroni, Maria & Tavares, Jose, 2021. "Long term performance analysis of low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) systems for building retrofit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    6. Rongrong Yu & Ning Gu & Michael J. Ostwald, 2022. "Architects’ Perceptions about Sustainable Design Practice and the Support Provided for This by Digital Tools: A Study in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Shariq, M. Hasan & Hughes, Ben Richard, 2020. "Revolutionising building inspection techniques to meet large-scale energy demands: A review of the state-of-the-art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Yue Huang & Youping Teng & Shuai Yang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of Macau, Based on the BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. So-Young Lee & Myoung-Won Oh, 2020. "Sustainable Design Alternatives and Energy Efficiency for Public Rental Housing in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Chi, Fang'ai & Zhang, Jianxun & Li, Gaomei & Zhu, Zongzhou & Bart, Dewancker, 2019. "An investigation of the impact of Building Azimuth on energy consumption in sizhai traditional dwellings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 594-614.
    11. Shen, Meng & Li, Xiang & Lu, Yujie & Cui, Qingbin & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Personality-based normative feedback intervention for energy conservation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    12. George M. Stavrakakis & Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis & Markos Damasiotis, 2021. "Basic Principles, Most Common Computational Tools, and Capabilities for Building Energy and Urban Microclimate Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-41, October.
    13. Bai, Yefei & Yu, Cong & Pan, Wei, 2024. "Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Khemakhem, Siwar & Rekik, Mouna & Krichen, Lotfi, 2019. "Double layer home energy supervision strategies based on demand response and plug-in electric vehicle control for flattening power load curves in a smart grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 312-324.
    15. José Pedro Carvalho & Fernanda Schmitd Villaschi & Luís Bragança, 2021. "Assessing Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Impacts of Building Construction Solutions with BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Muhammed Yildirim & Hasan Polat, 2023. "Building Information Modeling Applications in Energy-Efficient Refurbishment of Existing Building Stock: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Sheng-Yuan Wang & Kyung-Tae Lee & Ju-Hyung Kim, 2022. "Green Retrofitting Simulation for Sustainable Commercial Buildings in China Using a Proposed Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, June.
    18. Zihan Zhang & Junkang Song & Wanjiang Wang, 2023. "Study on the Behavior Strategy of the Subject of Low-Carbon Retrofit of Residential Buildings Based on Tripartite Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Heidrich, Oliver, 2019. "Emissions from urban bus fleets running on biodiesel blends under real-world operating conditions: Implications for designing future case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 276-292.
    20. Reckien, D. & Salvia, M. & Pietrapertosa, F. & Simoes, S.G. & Olazabal, M. & De Gregorio Hurtado, S. & Geneletti, D. & Krkoška Lorencová, E. & D'Alonzo, V. & Krook-Riekkola, A. & Fokaides, P.A. & Ioan, 2019. "Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 948-959.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10293-:d:1182733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.