IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v202y2024ics1364032124004271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Bai, Yefei
  • Yu, Cong
  • Pan, Wei

Abstract

Low-energy buildings (LEBs) play an important role in improving energy efficiency, reducing energy use, and mitigating carbon emissions to achieve the 2050 global decarbonisation target. However, increasing evidence indicates that energy performance gap (EPG), defined as the difference between predicted and actual energy performance, significantly inhibits the successful delivery of LEBs. This study aims to systematically examine EPG in the context of LEBs using the combination of the methods of literature review and meta-analysis with 76 carefully selected cases of LEBs from previous studies. Drawing on the dialectical system theory, the study develops a novel dialectical system framework to ensure the systematicity and comprehensiveness of the examination of EPG in LEBs. A new life cycle–human–technology–organisation framework is also established to clarify the complex causes of the EPG. The findings reveal that EPG in LEBs ranges from −86 % to +483 % with an average of +58 %. More than 80 % of the LEBs have a positive gap that their actual energy consumption is greater than their predicted energy consumption. It is found that technology-related and human-related causes of EPG have been popularly investigated, but organisation-related causes have been far inadequately explored. A roadmap for pursuing zero-energy gap is proposed to promote the successful delivery of LEBs. Knowledge gaps are identified, which point future research directions for achieving a systematic understanding of EPG in LEBs, bridging the EPG, and realising LEBs effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai, Yefei & Yu, Cong & Pan, Wei, 2024. "Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124004271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:202:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124004271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.