IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p170-d1011609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Subordinate Moqi to Work Engagement: The Role of Leader–Member Exchange in the Sustainability Context

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Du

    (Recruitment and Employment Office, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Bin He

    (School of National Governance, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

  • Luxiaohe Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    School of Foreign Languages, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Nan Luo

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Xuan Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Ai Wang

    (Foreign Language Department, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China)

Abstract

In search of sustainable strategies to improve employees’ work engagement without harming their long-term performance in the VUCA era, this study examines the impact path of subordinate moqi on employees’ work engagement based on leader–member exchange theory and organizational support theory. A total of 322 R&D staff from high-tech enterprises in Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, and other cities participated in the study. The data analysis reveals that the leader–member exchange partially mediates between subordinate moqi and work engagement. Moreover, both supervisor’s organizational embodiment and perceived organizational support can positively moderate the impact of subordinate moqi on leader–member exchange. The empirical results enrich the intermediary mechanism between subordinate moqi and work engagement. Employees with subordinate moqi have better chances of meeting their supervisors’ implicit expectations, leading to a higher relationship quality with followers and increasing enthusiasm for work. The current study clarifies the theoretical and practical significance of subordinate moqi in establishing high-quality work relationships and sustainable development of organizations’ human resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Du & Bin He & Luxiaohe Zhang & Nan Luo & Xuan Yu & Ai Wang, 2022. "From Subordinate Moqi to Work Engagement: The Role of Leader–Member Exchange in the Sustainability Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:170-:d:1011609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser & Dagher, Grace K. & Lythreatis, Sophie & Azakir, Mohamad, 2022. "Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-10.
    2. Sajjad Nazir & Wang Qun & Li Hui & Amina Shafi, 2018. "Influence of Social Exchange Relationships on Affective Commitment and Innovative Behavior: Role of Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    4. Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Côté, Karine & Lauzier, Martin & Stinglhamber, Florence, 2021. "The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 270-278.
    6. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2018. "Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Zhen Wang & Yuan Liu & Songbo Liu, 2019. "Authoritarian leadership and task performance: the effects of leader-member exchange and dependence on leader," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavla Vrabcová & Hana Urbancová, 2022. "Holistic human resource management as a tool for the intergenerational cooperation and sustainable business," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(4), pages 117-126.
    2. Mónica Santana & Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Susana Pasamar, 2020. "Mapping the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM): How Is This Relationship Measured?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Annibal Scavarda & Gláucya Daú & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2019. "An Analysis of the Corporate Social Responsibility and the Industry 4.0 with Focus on the Youth Generation: A Sustainable Human Resource Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Fuqiang Zhao & Manita Kusi & Yun Chen & Wei Hu & Fawad Ahmed & Dinesh Sukamani, 2021. "Influencing Mechanism of Green Human Resource Management and Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Sustainable Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Juan Herrera & Carlos de las Heras-Rosas, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management: Towards Sustainable Business Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Sainan Zhao, 2023. "Green HR Practices & Green Recovery Performance: The Mediating role of P-O Fit & Affective Commitment in Fast Food Industry of Pakistan," Energy Technologies and Environment, Anser Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Ghulam Abid & Francoise Contreras & Saira Ahmed & Tehmina Qazi, 2019. "Contextual Factors and Organizational Commitment: Examining the Mediating Role of Thriving at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Roberta Sferrazzo & Renato Ruffini, 2021. "Are Liberated Companies a Concrete Application of Sen’s Capability Approach?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 329-342, May.
    11. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Hellen Ogutu & Youssef El Archi & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 11-45, March.
    13. César Torres-Martín & Inmaculada Alemany-Arrebola & Manuel Enrique Lorenzo-Martín & Ángel Custodio Mingorance-Estrada, 2021. "Psychological Distress and Psychosocial Factors in the Non-Formal Context of Basketball Coaches in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Damianus Abun & Nimfa C. Catbagan & Theogenia Magallanes & Robert Rodrigo & Egdona A. Quinto, 2021. "Leadership Attitude of office Heads toward Employees and Leadership Styles," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 401-419, February.
    15. Chih-Hsing Liu & Quoc Phong La & Yen-Ling Ng & Rullyana Puspitaningrum Mamengko, 2023. "Discovering the Sustainable Innovation Service Process of Organizational Environment, Information Sharing and Satisfaction: The Moderating Roles of Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Turarova Aliya Manatovna & Nazym Esbergenovna Dabyltayeva & Elvira Abdulmitovna Ruziyeva & Gaukhar Sakhanova & Zhuldyz Maratovna Yelubayeva, 2023. "Unlocking Intersectoral Integration in Kazakhstan’s Agro-Industrial Complex: Technological Innovations, Knowledge Transfer, and Value Chain Governance as Predictors," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Priya Shah & Richa Singh Dubey & Shashikant Rai & Douglas W. S. Renwick & Saurabh Misra, 2024. "Green human resource management: A comprehensive investigation using bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 31-53, January.
    18. Khalid Hasan Al Jasimee & Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda, 2023. "A SEM-NCA approach towards the impact of participative budgeting on budgetary slack and managerial performance: The mediating role of leadership style and leader-member exchange," Papers 2310.09993, arXiv.org.
    19. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Qiuxiang Wen & Yingxuan Wu & Jing Long, 2021. "Influence of Ethical Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Flexible Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:170-:d:1011609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.