IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5672-d810831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Use of Construction Technology Designs for Expert Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Čeněk Jarský

    (Department of Construction Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, CTU in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Miloslava Popenková

    (Department of Construction Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, CTU in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jozef Gašparík

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Patrik Šťastný

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

This article describes the basic principles and results of an expert system for construction planning and management. In the field of expert opinions, the system greatly helps to determine the limit of unreasonably low construction prices on the basis of a rapid cost analysis. Additionally, it can determine the technologically shortest possible construction periods or can answer the question of whether it is possible to complete the construction in the specified period, provided that a certain amount of construction is currently underway, which is very useful in expert opinions. The system is based on modeling the construction process using the so-called construction technology network graphs. This method allows, among other things, to create and use so-called typical network graphs as preprepared models of individual types of objects in the form of computer files, which can be modified according to the spatial structure of real buildings or facilities when used in creating a feasibility study or efficient time and financial planning and management of the building process. The system also enables the automatic creation of quality assurance checklists (inspection and acceptance plans for quality assurance), environmental plans (plans for the elimination of adverse effects of construction activities on the environment), and safety and health plans. Direct links to the bills of quantities (list of works and supplies with numbering of individual items), budgets (list of works and supplies with prices), or production calculations, despite the operational records of the actual construction process also on the company’s accounting agenda, are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Čeněk Jarský & Miloslava Popenková & Jozef Gašparík & Patrik Šťastný, 2022. "On Use of Construction Technology Designs for Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5672-:d:810831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "Sustainability in Construction Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    2. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Borna Dasović & Mario Galić & Uroš Klanšek, 2020. "A Survey on Integration of Optimization and Project Management Tools for Sustainable Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radka Kantová & Vít Motyčka, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainability of Czech Vocational Education and Practical Training for the Position of Construction Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harkaitz García & Mikel Zubizarreta & Jesús Cuadrado & Juan Luis Osa, 2018. "Sustainability Improvement in the Design of Lightweight Roofs: A New Prototype of Hybrid Steel and Wood Purlins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Trang Thi Thu Tran, 2021. "Stochastic Chebyshev Goal Programming Mixed Integer Linear Model for Sustainable Global Production Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Borna Dasović & Uroš Klanšek, 2022. "A Review of Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Construction Scheduling Supported with Optimization Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Mazen J. Al-Kheetan & Juliana Byzyka & Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar, 2021. "Sustainable Valorisation of Silane-Treated Waste Glass Powder in Concrete Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Giovanni Santi & Emanuele Leporelli & Michele Di Sivo, 2019. "Improving Sustainability in Architectural Research: Biopsychosocial Requirements in the Design of Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Kyunghwan Kim, 2020. "Generalized Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method to Improve Sustainability in Construction Project Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Eglė Klumbytė & Raimondas Bliūdžius & Milena Medineckienė & Paris A. Fokaides, 2021. "An MCDM Model for Sustainable Decision-Making in Municipal Residential Buildings Facilities Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Idris Othman & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohanad Kamil Buniya, 2020. "Identifying and Assessing Sustainable Value Management Implementation Activities in Developing Countries: The Case of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Michał Tomczak & Piotr Jaśkowski, 2021. "Preferences of Construction Managers Regarding the Quality and Optimization Criteria of Project Schedules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Mohd. Ahmed & Javed Mallick & Saeed AlQadhi & Nabil Ben Kahla, 2020. "Development of Concrete Mixture Design Process Using MCDM Approach for Sustainable Concrete Quality Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Garusinghe Dewa Ayesha Udari Garusinghe & Balasooriya Arachchige Kanchana Shiromi Perera & Umesha Sasanthi Weerapperuma, 2023. "Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Modular Construction to Enhance Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Andreia de Castro e Silva & Robson Seleme & Wiliam de Assis Silva & Izabel Cristina Zattar & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara & Osiris Canciglieri Júnior & Lisianne Brittes Benitez, 2022. "Evaluation and Choice Criteria of Sustainable Suppliers in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study in Brazilian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Marco Huymajer & Matthias Woegerbauer & Leopold Winkler & Alexandra Mazak-Huemer & Hubert Biedermann, 2022. "An Interdisciplinary Systematic Review on Sustainability in Tunneling—Bibliometrics, Challenges, and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, February.
    15. Wei He & Wenjing Li & Wei Wang, 2021. "Developing a Resource Allocation Approach for Resource-Constrained Construction Operation under Multi-Objective Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Jozef Gašparík & Vít Motyčka & Patrik Šťastný & Sylvia Szalayová, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Optimization of Mechanized Earth Processes and Its Impact on Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Fernando Acebes & David Poza & Jose M Gonzalez-Varona & Javier Pajares & Adolfo Lopez-Paredes, 2024. "On the project risk baseline: integrating aleatory uncertainty into project scheduling," Papers 2406.00077, arXiv.org.
    18. Orlando Lima & Gabriela Fernandes & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Benefits of Adopting Innovation and Sustainability Practices in Project Management within the SME Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Borna Dasović & Uroš Klanšek, 2021. "Integration of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Program and Project Management Tool to Support Sustainable Cost-Optimal Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Mohamed Elseknidy & Mohamed Magdy Hamed & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Barriers to the Implementation of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for Sustainable Building in a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5672-:d:810831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.