IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i2p116-d128190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood

Author

Listed:
  • Jozef Švajlenka

    (Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Vysokoškolská 4, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Mária Kozlovská

    (Department of Construction Technology and Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Vysokoškolská 4, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Recent developments in the construction industry have brought more efficient and sustainable technologies, technological procedures, and materials. An example of this are modern methods of construction, which offer larger production volumes with a higher quality and shorter procurement time. The goal of those methods is to improve construction sustainability through quality improvement, customer satisfaction, shortened construction time, and reduced environmental impact. The main goal of this research is to demonstrate, by means of theoretical assumptions, surveys, and analyses, the sustainability of modern methods of construction based on wood. The work focuses on identifying the user criteria for construction sustainability. Selected user criteria of construction sustainability are applied in a socio-economic survey whose purpose is to determine how users perceive the efficiency of selected construction systems. We evaluate certain user parameters in the context of sustainability by relying on the users of buildings (family houses) which have already been built and compare the results with declared design parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:116-:d:128190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Pan & Alistair Gibb & Andrew Dainty, 2007. "Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 183-194.
    2. Leif Gustavsson & Kim Pingoud & Roger Sathre, 2006. "Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 667-691, May.
    3. Alistair Gibb, 2001. "Standardization and pre-assembly- distinguishing myth from reality using case study research," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 307-315.
    4. Sathre, Roger & Gustavsson, Leif, 2009. "Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 251-257, February.
    5. Karl Wagner, 2014. "Generation of a Tropically Adapted Energy Performance Certificate for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Haibo Guo & Ying Liu & Yiping Meng & Haoyu Huang & Cheng Sun & Yu Shao, 2017. "A Comparison of the Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance between Reinforced Concrete and Cross-Laminated Timber Structures in Residential Buildings in the Severe Cold Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Cinzia Buratti & Elisa Moretti & Elisa Belloni & Fabrizio Agosti, 2014. "Development of Innovative Aerogel Based Plasters: Preliminary Thermal and Acoustic Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Vidushini Siva & Thomas Hoppe & Mansi Jain, 2017. "Green Buildings in Singapore; Analyzing a Frontrunner’s Sectoral Innovation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Xiaohuan Xie & Yi Lu & Zhonghua Gou, 2017. "Green Building Pro-Environment Behaviors: Are Green Users Also Green Buyers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Idris Othman & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohanad Kamil Buniya, 2020. "Identifying and Assessing Sustainable Value Management Implementation Activities in Developing Countries: The Case of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Jozef Gašparík & Vít Motyčka & Patrik Šťastný & Sylvia Szalayová, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Optimization of Mechanized Earth Processes and Its Impact on Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Radka Kantová & Vít Motyčka, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainability of Czech Vocational Education and Practical Training for the Position of Construction Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Harkaitz García & Mikel Zubizarreta & Jesús Cuadrado & Juan Luis Osa, 2018. "Sustainability Improvement in the Design of Lightweight Roofs: A New Prototype of Hybrid Steel and Wood Purlins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Andreia de Castro e Silva & Robson Seleme & Wiliam de Assis Silva & Izabel Cristina Zattar & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara & Osiris Canciglieri Júnior & Lisianne Brittes Benitez, 2022. "Evaluation and Choice Criteria of Sustainable Suppliers in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study in Brazilian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Paul Mansell & Simon P. Philbin & Efrosyni Konstantinou, 2020. "Delivering UN Sustainable Development Goals’ Impact on Infrastructure Projects: An Empirical Study of Senior Executives in the UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Čeněk Jarský & Miloslava Popenková & Jozef Gašparík & Patrik Šťastný, 2022. "On Use of Construction Technology Designs for Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    9. Asaad Almssad & Amjad Almusaed & Raad Z. Homod, 2022. "Masonry in the Context of Sustainable Buildings: A Review of the Brick Role in Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Mohamed Elseknidy & Mohamed Magdy Hamed & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Barriers to the Implementation of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for Sustainable Building in a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Houses Based on Wood as an Ecological and Sustainable Housing Alternative—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Seoyoung Jung & Seulki Lee & Jungho Yu, 2021. "Identification and Prioritization of Critical Success Factors for Off-Site Construction Using ISM and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Jeong-hoon Lee & Jin-sung Kim & Hak-ju Lee & Young-Min Lee & Hyung-Geun Kim, 2019. "Small-Scale Public Rental Housing Development Using Modular Construction—Lessons learned from Case Studies in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Yu Dong & Tongyu Qin & Siyuan Zhou & Lu Huang & Rui Bo & Haibo Guo & Xunzhi Yin, 2020. "Comparative Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Performance of Reinforced Concrete and Timber Stadiums—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Winchester, Niven & Reilly, John M., 2020. "The economic and emissions benefits of engineered wood products in a low-carbon future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Xiaolun Wang & Xinlin Yao, 2020. "Fueling Pro-Environmental Behaviors with Gamification Design: Identifying Key Elements in Ant Forest with the Kano Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Yang, Jiangming & Wu, Huijun & Xu, Xinhua & Huang, Gongsheng & Xu, Tao & Guo, Sitong & Liang, Yuying, 2019. "Numerical and experimental study on the thermal performance of aerogel insulating panels for building energy efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 445-457.
    8. Shenghan Li & Huanyu Wu & Zhikun Ding, 2018. "Identifying Sustainable Wood Sources for the Construction Industry: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Sathre, Roger & Gustavsson, Leif, 2009. "Process-based analysis of added value in forest product industries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 65-75, January.
    10. Martina Záleská & Milena Pavlíková & Martin Vyšvařil & Zbyšek Pavlík, 2021. "Effect of Aggregate and Binder Type on the Functional and Durability Parameters of Lightweight Repair Mortars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "Constraints on the Promotion of Prefabricated Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1, July.
    12. Luo, Wen & Mineo, Keito & Matsushita, Koji & Kanzaki, Mamoru, 2018. "Consumer willingness to pay for modern wooden structures: A comparison between China and Japan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 84-93.
    13. Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Selecting a Suitable Sustainable Construction Method for Australian High-Rise Building: A Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Pei Dang & Zhanwen Niu & Shang Gao & Lei Hou & Guomin Zhang, 2020. "Critical Factors Influencing the Sustainable Construction Capability in Prefabrication of Chinese Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Cindy X. Chen & Francesca Pierobon & Susan Jones & Ian Maples & Yingchun Gong & Indroneil Ganguly, 2021. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mass Timber and Concrete Residential Buildings: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Susan Bogus & Keith Molenaar & James Diekmann, 2006. "Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 829-837.
    17. Sampo Soimakallio & Tuomo Kalliokoski & Aleksi Lehtonen & Olli Salminen, 2021. "On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Qian-Cheng Wang & Yi-Xuan Wang & Izzy Yi Jian & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Xuan Liu & Yao-Tian Ma, 2020. "Exploring the “Energy-Saving Personality Traits” in the Office and Household Situation: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Craig Langston & Weiwei Zhang, 2021. "DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Nick Blismas & Christine Pasquire & Alistair Gibb, 2006. "Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 121-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:116-:d:128190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.