IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p544-d476874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences of Construction Managers Regarding the Quality and Optimization Criteria of Project Schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Tomczak

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, 40 Nadbystrzycka St, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Piotr Jaśkowski

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, 40 Nadbystrzycka St, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

In the literature on the scheduling of construction projects it is difficult to find a justification for adopting the criteria for evaluating work schedules based explicitly on the preferences of those who develop them. This article tries to fill this gap and provide information on the preferences of construction site managers for sustainable scheduling and organization of construction projects. The publication focuses on the views and needs of construction site engineering staff regarding methods of work organization, the need to reduce downtimes in the work of crews, the deadline for project realization and the selection of crews for tasks. This information was obtained on the basis of surveys conducted among managerial staff of various levels (74 people). The authors hope that the information provided in this publication will allow the creation of more reliable tools to support construction managers better adapted to their preferences and needs, and therefore more likely to be applied in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Tomczak & Piotr Jaśkowski, 2021. "Preferences of Construction Managers Regarding the Quality and Optimization Criteria of Project Schedules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:544-:d:476874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhilasha Panwar & Kumar Neeraj Jha, 2019. "A many-objective optimization model for construction scheduling," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(12), pages 727-739, December.
    2. Mohamed Marzouk & Magdy Madany & Azza Abou-Zied & Moheeb El-said, 2008. "Handling construction pollutions using multi-objective optimization," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 1113-1125.
    3. Borna Dasović & Mario Galić & Uroš Klanšek, 2020. "A Survey on Integration of Optimization and Project Management Tools for Sustainable Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borna Dasović & Uroš Klanšek, 2022. "A Review of Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Construction Scheduling Supported with Optimization Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Wei He & Wenjing Li & Wei Wang, 2021. "Developing a Resource Allocation Approach for Resource-Constrained Construction Operation under Multi-Objective Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Chia-Nan Wang & Nhat-Luong Nhieu & Trang Thi Thu Tran, 2021. "Stochastic Chebyshev Goal Programming Mixed Integer Linear Model for Sustainable Global Production Planning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Kyunghwan Kim, 2020. "Generalized Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method to Improve Sustainability in Construction Project Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Zhiwu Zhou & Julián Alcalá & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Optimized Application of Sustainable Development Strategy in International Engineering Project Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-29, July.
    6. Fernando Acebes & David Poza & Jose M Gonzalez-Varona & Javier Pajares & Adolfo Lopez-Paredes, 2024. "On the project risk baseline: integrating aleatory uncertainty into project scheduling," Papers 2406.00077, arXiv.org.
    7. Orlando Lima & Gabriela Fernandes & Anabela Tereso, 2023. "Benefits of Adopting Innovation and Sustainability Practices in Project Management within the SME Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Borna Dasović & Uroš Klanšek, 2021. "Integration of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Program and Project Management Tool to Support Sustainable Cost-Optimal Construction Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Mateusz Trzeciak & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2021. "Monitoring and Control in Program Management as Effectiveness Drivers in Polish Energy Sector. Diagnosis and Directions of Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Sayyid Ali Banihashemi & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2021. "Investigating the Environmental Impacts of Construction Projects in Time-Cost Trade-Off Project Scheduling Problems with CoCoSo Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. YeEun Jang & JeongWook Son & June-Seong Yi, 2021. "Classifying the Level of Bid Price Volatility Based on Machine Learning with Parameters from Bid Documents as Risk Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Čeněk Jarský & Miloslava Popenková & Jozef Gašparík & Patrik Šťastný, 2022. "On Use of Construction Technology Designs for Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Sayyid Ali Banihashemi & Mohammad Khalilzadeh, 2023. "Towards sustainable project scheduling with reducing environmental pollution of projects: fuzzy multi-objective programming approach to a case study of Eastern Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7737-7767, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:544-:d:476874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.