IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3623-d774963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Local Production”: What Do Consumers Think?

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Maria Merlino

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Alessandro Sciullo

    (Department of Culture, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10153 Turin, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Giacomo Pettenati

    (Department of Culture, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10153 Turin, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Francesco Sottile

    (Department of Architecture, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 14, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Cristiana Peano

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy)

  • Stefano Massaglia

    (Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy)

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, there has been a growing interest among consumers and producers in downscaling to a local level the length of the agri-food chains as a solution for fairer and more sustainable food production systems. From the point of view of consumption, the attribute “local” is assuming an important role in defining food purchasing preferences, both in terms of expectations of product quality and in terms of its perceived relevance in determining the supply chain sustainability. This research aims to define how individuals’ perception of local production influences the definition of “local” among consumers based on a survey submitted to a sample of 500 consumers in North-Western Italy. The paper provides: (i) a semantic map built on keywords adopted by the respondents to describe local production; (ii) a categorization of food consumers divided in clusters on the basis of their eating styles; and (iii) a characterization of consumers clusters according to the preferences and knowledge expressed towards local production. The results show that consumers’ awareness and attitudes towards the concept of the “local” are influenced by the joint effect of their socio-demographic profile and their food consumption style, with some unexpected evidences that would deserve to be deepen with further research. However, given this uncertainty, three main traits seem to characterize the consumers attitude towards the “local”: a positive relation among the dimensions of environment, local development and product quality and the strength of the link between local production and the reduction of the length of the supply chain. Ultimately, territoriality is perceived as an index of higher product quality (seasonal, therefore fresh and genuine).

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Maria Merlino & Alessandro Sciullo & Giacomo Pettenati & Francesco Sottile & Cristiana Peano & Stefano Massaglia, 2022. "“Local Production”: What Do Consumers Think?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3623-:d:774963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiara Mazzocchi & Stefano Corsi & Giordano Ruggeri, 2020. "The Coexistence of Local and Global Food Supply Chains: The Lombardy Region Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Stephan Zielke, 2017. "Can't Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 211-251, March.
    3. Claudia Bazzani & Daniele Asioli & Maurizio Canavari & Elisabetta Gozzoli, 2016. "Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards Farmers' Markets: the case of a Slow Food "Earth Market"®," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 18(3), pages 283-302.
    4. Patricia Allen, 2010. "Realizing justice in local food systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(2), pages 295-308.
    5. Zepeda, Lydia & Li, Jinghan, 2006. "Who Buys Local Food?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(3), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Knight, Andrew J., 2013. "Evaluating local food programs: The case of Select Nova Scotia," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 29-39.
    7. Alessandro Corsi & Filippo Barbera & Egidio Dansero & Cristiana Peano (ed.), 2018. "Alternative Food Networks," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-90409-2, December.
    8. Grunert, Klaus G. & Hieke, Sophie & Wills, Josephine, 2014. "Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 177-189.
    9. Cristiana Peano & Valentina Maria Merlino & Francesco Sottile & Danielle Borra & Stefano Massaglia, 2019. "Sustainability for Food Consumers: Which Perception?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2018. "Revisiting the Sustainability Concept of Urban Food Production from a Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Birch, Dawn & Memery, Juliet & De Silva Kanakaratne, Maheshan, 2018. "The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 221-228.
    12. Ekaterina Arabska, 2021. "From farm to fork: Human health and well-being through sustainable agri-food systems," JOURNAL OF LIFE ECONOMICS, Holistence Publications, vol. 8(1), pages .11-27, January.
    13. V. Aslihan Nasir & Fahri Karakaya, 2014. "Underlying Motivations of Organic Food Purchase Intentions," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 290-308, June.
    14. Hughes, David W. & Eades, Daniel C. & Robinson, Kenneth L. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Isengildina, Olga & Brown, Cheryl, 2007. "What is the Deal with Local Food Systems: Or, Local Food Systems from a Regional Science Perspective," UCED Working Papers 112897, Clemson University, University Center for Economic Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roland Z. Szabó & Borbála Szedmák & Anna Tajti & Péter Bera, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability, Digitalisation, and the Entrepreneurial Perception of Distances as Drivers of SMEs’ Internationalisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Tatjana Peulić & Aleksandar Marić & Nikola Maravić & Aleksandra Novaković & Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Ivana Čabarkapa & Jasmina Lazarević & Stefan Šmugović & Predrag Ikonić, 2023. "Consumer Attitudes and Preferences towards Traditional Food Products in Vojvodina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Groth, Carolin & Wegmann, Christoph & Meyerding, Stephan G.H., 2023. "Perception of product sustainability: The case of processed tomatoes – A qualitative study in Germany," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catalin M. Stancu & Alice Grønhøj & Liisa Lähteenmäki, 2020. "Meanings and Motives for Consumers’ Sustainable Actions in the Food and Clothing Domains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Birch, Dawn & Memery, Juliet & De Silva Kanakaratne, Maheshan, 2018. "The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 221-228.
    3. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Giovanna Piracci & Emilia Lamonaca & Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2024. "On the willingness to pay for food sustainability labelling: A meta‐analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 329-345, March.
    5. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    6. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers’ attitudes on carbon footprint labelling. Results of the SUSDIET project," Thünen Working Paper 266396, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    7. Claudio Acciani & Annalisa De Boni & Francesco Bozzo & Rocco Roma, 2020. "Pulses for Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: The Effect of Origin on Market Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. BAGLIONE, Stephen L. & TUCCI, Louis A. & STANTON, John L., 2019. "Organic Food: Identifying Actionable Segments," Holistic Marketing Management Journal, Holistic Marketing Management, vol. 9(1), pages 10-27, March.
    9. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    10. Yuna Chiffoleau & Sarah Millet-Amrani & Arielle Canard, 2016. "From Short Food Supply Chains to Sustainable Agriculture in Urban Food Systems: Food Democracy as a Vector of Transition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Yamna Erraach & Fatma Jaafer & Ivana Radić & Mechthild Donner, 2021. "Sustainability Labels on Olive Oil: A Review on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Defrancesco, Edi & Perito, Maria Angela & Bozzolan, Irene & Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca, 2017. "Consumers’ Preferences for Health Related and Environmental Friendly Food Attributes of Italian Pasta," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    13. De Francesco, Edi & Perito, Maria Angela & Bozzolan, Irene & Stefani, Gianluca & Cei, Leonardo Cei, 2017. "Consumers’ preferences for private health-related and public environmentally friendly food attributes: New insights from an ABR approach," 2017 Sixth AIEAA Conference, June 15-16, Piacenza, Italy 261258, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    14. Adam Czudec, 2022. "The Altruistic Behaviour of Consumers Who Prefer a Local Origin of Organic Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    15. María D. Bovea & Valeria Ibáñez-Forés & Victoria Pérez-Belis & Pablo Juan & Marta Braulio-Gonzalo & Carlos Díaz-Ávalos, 2018. "Incorporation of Circular Aspects into Product Design and Labelling: Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Luigi Bollani & Alessandro Bonadonna & Giovanni Peira, 2019. "The Millennials’ Concept of Sustainability in the Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brandusa Mariana Bejan, 2018. "Green DIY store choice among socially responsible consumer generations," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Maria Teresa Trentinaglia De Daverio & Teresina Mancuso & Massimo Peri & Lucia Baldi, 2020. "How Does Consumers’ Care for Origin Shape Their Behavioural Gap for Environmentally Friendly Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Xin Qi & Huaming Yu & Angelika Ploeger, 2020. "Exploring Influential Factors Including COVID-19 on Green Food Purchase Intentions and the Intention–Behaviour Gap: A Qualitative Study among Consumers in a Chinese Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Ariane Voglhuber-Slavinsky & Hartmut Derler & Björn Moller & Ewa Dönitz & Enno Bahrs & Simon Berner, 2021. "Measures to Increase Local Food Supply in the Context of European Framework Scenarios for the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3623-:d:774963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.