IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3046-d764589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating Safe FFF 3D Printing: A Prototype Material Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Karayannis

    (IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium)

  • Stratos Saliakas

    (IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium)

  • Ioannis Kokkinopoulos

    (IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium)

  • Spyridon Damilos

    (IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium)

  • Elias P. Koumoulos

    (IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium)

  • Eleni Gkartzou

    (School of Chemical Engineering, R-Nano Lab, Laboratory of Advanced, Composite, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, National Technical University of Athens, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Julio Gomez

    (Avanzare Innovacion Tecnologica S.L., Av. Lentiscares 4-6, 26370 Navarrete, Spain)

  • Constantinos Charitidis

    (School of Chemical Engineering, R-Nano Lab, Laboratory of Advanced, Composite, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, National Technical University of Athens, 15773 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has introduced a paradigm shift in the manufacturing world, and it is increasing in popularity. In cases of such rapid and widespread acceptance of novel technologies, material or process safety issues may be underestimated, due to safety research being outpaced by the breakthroughs of innovation. However, a definitive approach in studying the various occupational or environmental risks of new technologies is a vital part of their sustainable application. In fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing, the practicality and simplicity of the method are juxtaposed by ultrafine particle (UFP) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emission hazards. In this work, the decision of selecting the optimal material for the mass production of a microfluidic device substrate via FFF 3D printing is supported by an emission/exposure assessment. Three candidate prototype materials are evaluated in terms of their comparative emission potential. The impact of nozzle temperature settings, as well as the microfluidic device’s structural characteristics regarding the magnitude of emissions, is evaluated. The projected exposure of the employees operating the 3D printer is determined. The concept behind this series of experiments is proposed as a methodology to generate an additional set of decision-support decision-making criteria for FFF 3D printing production cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Karayannis & Stratos Saliakas & Ioannis Kokkinopoulos & Spyridon Damilos & Elias P. Koumoulos & Eleni Gkartzou & Julio Gomez & Constantinos Charitidis, 2022. "Facilitating Safe FFF 3D Printing: A Prototype Material Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3046-:d:764589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3046/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex J L Morgan & Lorena Hidalgo San Jose & William D Jamieson & Jennifer M Wymant & Bing Song & Phil Stephens & David A Barrow & Oliver K Castell, 2016. "Simple and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament Fabrication," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Luís Mendes & Anneli Kangas & Kirsi Kukko & Bjarke Mølgaard & Arto Säämänen & Tomi Kanerva & Iñigo Flores Ituarte & Marika Huhtiniemi & Helene Stockmann-Juvala & Jouni Partanen & Kaarle Hämeri & Konst, 2017. "Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 94-106, November.
    3. Attaran, Mohsen, 2017. "The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 677-688.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yousif Saad Alshebly & Khameel B. Mustapha & Ali Zolfagharian & Mahdi Bodaghi & Mohamed Sultan Mohamed Ali & Haider Abbas Almurib & Marwan Nafea, 2022. "Bioinspired Pattern-Driven Single-Material 4D Printing for Self-Morphing Actuators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Noura Al-Mazrouei & Ali H. Al-Marzouqi & Waleed Ahmed, 2022. "Characterization and Sustainability Potential of Recycling 3D-Printed Nylon Composite Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirin Khaki & Maud Rio & Philippe Marin, 2022. "Characterization of Emissions in Fab Labs: An Additive Manufacturing Environment Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Ayman Altuwaim & Abdulelah AlTasan & Abdulmohsen Almohsen, 2023. "Success Criteria for Applying Construction Technologies in Residential Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & Celeste Jacinto & Helena Carvalho & Inês Ribeiro & Paulo Peças, 2019. "Additive Manufacturing: Exploring the Social Changes and Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    5. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    6. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    7. Gedas Baranauskas & Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Renata Korsakienė, 2020. "Mapping the Scientific Research on Mass Customization Domain: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Caviggioli, Federico & Ughetto, Elisa, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 254-268.
    9. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    10. Maresch, Daniela & Gartner, Johannes, 2020. "Make disruptive technological change happen - The case of additive manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Watanabe, Chihiro & Akhtar, Waleed & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2021. "Amazon's New Supra-Omnichannel: Realizing Growing Seamless Switching for Apparel During COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Serena Strazzullo, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing and Green Information Systems as Technological Capabilities for Firm Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 515-534, December.
    13. Zhichao Liu & Qiuhong Jiang & Fuda Ning & Hoyeol Kim & Weilong Cong & Changxue Xu & Hong-chao Zhang, 2018. "Investigation of Energy Requirements and Environmental Performance for Additive Manufacturing Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Holzmann, Patrick & Breitenecker, Robert J. & Schwarz, Erich J. & Gregori, Patrick, 2020. "Business model design for novel technologies in nascent industries: An investigation of 3D printing service providers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Lacroix, Rachel & Seifert, Ralf W. & Timonina-Farkas, Anna, 2021. "Benefiting from additive manufacturing for mass customization across the product life cycle," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    16. Tullio de Rubeis & Annamaria Ciccozzi & Letizia Giusti & Dario Ambrosini, 2022. "The 3D Printing Potential for Heat Flow Optimization: Influence of Block Geometries on Heat Transfer Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Niclas Hoffmann & Robert Stahlbock & Stefan Voß, 2020. "A decision model on the repair and maintenance of shipping containers," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Konstantinos Kalkanis & Kyriaki Kiskira & Panagiotis Papageorgas & Stavros D. Kaminaris & Dimitrios Piromalis & George Banis & Dimitrios Mpelesis & Athanasios Batagiannis, 2023. "Advanced Manufacturing Design of an Emergency Mechanical Ventilator via 3D Printing—Effective Crisis Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Woldt, Jason & Godfrey, Michael, 2022. "Is there a home field advantage? The impact of shareholder wealth from U.S. manufacturing location decisions: A comparative analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    20. Sun, Mingyao & Ng, Chi To & Yang, Liu & Zhang, Tianhua, 2024. "Optimal after-sales service offering strategy: Additive manufacturing, traditional manufacturing, or hybrid?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3046-:d:764589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.