IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2839-d761260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement of Street Network Structure in Strip Cities: A Case Study of Lanzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yongsheng Qian

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Junwei Zeng

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xuting Wei

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xiaoping Guang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

As the foundation and skeleton of urban space, the street network is significant to the urban travel environment and socio-economic activities. To reveal the structural characteristics of the street network, this paper proposes a measurement index system to study the street network structure and urban travel characteristics. To illustrate the relationship between spatial accessibility of streets in strip cities and residents’ travel and service demands, we take Lanzhou, a typical strip city, as an example for network analysis and study the hierarchical structure of physical, functional, and environmental characteristics of the street topological network. The results show that Lanzhou City has formed a radial network structure with traffic-oriented streets as the backbone and interconnected living streets. However, the development of old and new urban areas is still uneven. In terms of street function distribution, streets with a high degree of diversity are more attractive to population clustering and show a polycentric clustering feature in space related to the regional functional orientation and travel characteristics. Much of the structural difference in the centrality core-periphery of the street network under pedestrian and vehicular travel patterns are influenced by the street’s type and function. In addition, as part of the contribution, we provide an evaluation methodology that enables the analysis of street network centrality. These findings advance our understanding of strip city development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Li & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2022. "Measurement of Street Network Structure in Strip Cities: A Case Study of Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2839-:d:761260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2839/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2839/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhigao Wang & Liang Li & Yinghao Li, 2015. "From super block to small block: urban form transformation and its road network impacts in Chenggong, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 683-699, June.
    2. Xiaodong Xu & Xinhan Xu & Peng Guan & Yu Ren & Wei Wang & Ning Xu, 2018. "The Cause and Evolution of Urban Street Vitality under the Time Dimension: Nine Cases of Streets in Nanjing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Xin Li & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2021. "The Influence of Strip-City Street Network Structure on Spatial Vitality: Case Studies in Lanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Zuo, Ting & Wei, Heng, 2019. "Bikeway prioritization to increase bicycle network connectivity and bicycle-transit connection: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 52-71.
    5. Baorui Han & Dazhi Sun & Xiaomei Yu & Wanlu Song & Lisha Ding, 2020. "Classification of Urban Street Networks Based on Tree-Like Network Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Zhu, Zhenran & Zhang, Anming & Zhang, Yahua, 2018. "Connectivity of intercity passenger transportation in China: A multi-modal and network approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-276.
    7. Sybil Derrible & Christopher Kennedy, 2010. "Characterizing metro networks: state, form, and structure," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 275-297, March.
    8. Richard Arnott & Tilmann Rave & Ronnie Schöb, 2005. "Alleviating Urban Traffic Congestion," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012197, April.
    9. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    10. Stefano Moroni & Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "Forms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 220-234, February.
    11. Lämmer, Stefan & Gehlsen, Björn & Helbing, Dirk, 2006. "Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 89-95.
    12. Yong-Sheng Qian & Min Wang & Hong-Xia Kang & Jun-Wei Zeng & Yu-Fei Liu, 2012. "Study on the Road Network Connectivity Reliability of Valley City Based on Complex Network," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-14, October.
    13. Fielbaum, Andrés & Jara-Diaz, Sergio & Gschwender, Antonio, 2016. "Optimal public transport networks for a general urban structure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 298-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Cats, Oded, 2017. "Topological evolution of a metropolitan rail transport network: The case of Stockholm," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 172-183.
    3. David Levinson, 2012. "Network Structure and City Size," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    5. Xin Li & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Xuting Wei & Xiaoping Guang, 2021. "The Influence of Strip-City Street Network Structure on Spatial Vitality: Case Studies in Lanzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Nir Sharav & Yoram Shiftan, 2021. "Optimal Urban Transit Investment Model and Its Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Batac, Rene C. & Cirunay, Michelle T., 2022. "Shortest paths along urban road network peripheries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    8. Bruno De Borger & Bart Wuyts, 2009. "Commuting, Transport Tax Reform and the Labour Market: Employer-paid Parking and the Relative Efficiency of Revenue Recycling Instruments," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 213-233, January.
    9. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Lu, Mengyuan & Perez, Edgar Jimenez & Mason, Keith & He, Yin, 2024. "Fractal assessment analysis of China's air-HSR network integration," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    12. Cats, Oded & Jenelius, Erik, 2015. "Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-61.
    13. Raimbault, Juste & Le Néchet, Florent, 2021. "Introducing endogenous transport provision in a LUTI model to explore polycentric governance systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Garvin, Michael J. & Brown, Bryan L., 2019. "Characterizing and measuring transportation infrastructure diversity through linkages with ecological stability theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 114-130.
    15. Arnott, Richard, 2007. "Congestion tolling with agglomeration externalities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 187-203, September.
    16. Redondi, Renato & Birolini, Sebastian & Morlotti, Chiara & Paleari, Stefano, 2021. "Connectivity measures and passengers’ behavior: Comparing conventional connectivity models to predict itinerary market shares," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Ali Enes Dingil & Federico Rupi & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "An Integrative Review of Socio-Technical Factors Influencing Travel Decision-Making and Urban Transport Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Luca S. D’Acci & David Banister & Roger W. White, 2024. "Liveable urban forms: planning, self-organisation, and a third way (Isobenefit urbanism)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Ian W.H. Parry, 2009. "Pricing Urban Congestion," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 1(1), pages 461-484, September.
    20. Arnott, Richard & Shevyakhova, Elizaveta, 2014. "Tenancy rent control and credible commitment in maintenance," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 72-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2839-:d:761260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.