IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2226-d750380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of National Culture in Companies with Different Ownership on Employees’ CSR Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Goran Radovanović

    (Military Academy Management, University of Defence, Veljka Lukića Kurjaka 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ljiljana Miletić

    (Faculty of Project and Innovation Management, Educons University, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Samed Karović

    (Faculty of Security Studies, Educons University, 21208 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia)

  • Marijana Dukić Mijatović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milan Bubulj

    (Faculty of Management, University Union Nikola Tesla, 21205 Sremski Karlovci, Serbia)

Abstract

Starting from the fact that perceptions of employees might be related to national culture and our previous finding that CSR perception by employees depends on company ownership, in the present research, we aim at the investigation of relations between CSR and national culture perception by employees’ dependence on company ownership in the specific context of Serbia as a developing post-socialist country. Questionnaire-based research was conducted among employees in public and private companies in Serbia with domestic and foreign ownership. The results pointed out that both CSR and national culture perceptions are highly dependent on company ownership with the dependence of CSR perception on national culture perception by employees in public but not private companies. The obtained results point out that in private companies, excessive adoption of managerial practices not aligned with national culture resulted in shifts in perception of national culture, as well as in divergence between national culture and perceptions of CSR activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Goran Radovanović & Ljiljana Miletić & Samed Karović & Marijana Dukić Mijatović & Milan Bubulj, 2022. "Influence of National Culture in Companies with Different Ownership on Employees’ CSR Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2226-:d:750380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vuković, Andrea & Miletić, Ljiljana Z. & Ćurčić, Radmila & Ničić, Milica & Mitrović, Nenad, 2020. "Employees‘ Perception of CSR in a Specific Post-Socialist Context: The Case of Serbia," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 25(1), pages 55-83.
    2. Simeon Djankov & Peter Murrell, 2002. "Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(3), pages 739-792, September.
    3. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    4. Emilio Abad-Segura & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña, 2019. "The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Ganganee C. Samaraweera & Chongguang Li & Ping Qing, 2014. "Mitigating Product Harm Crises and Making Markets Sustainable: How does National Culture Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Elif Akben-Selcuk, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu, 2014. "The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Matteo Pedrini & Valentina Bramanti & Benedetto Cannatelli, 2016. "The impact of national culture and social capital on corporate social responsibility attitude among immigrants entrepreneurs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 759-787, December.
    9. Sehar Zulfiqar & Rabeea Sadaf & József Popp & Jolita Vveinhardt & Domicián Máté, 2019. "An Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Behavior: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Namporn Thanetsunthorn & Rattaphon Wuthisatian, 2018. "Cultural configuration models: corporate social responsibility and national culture," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1137-1175, May.
    11. Gerhart, Barry, 2009. "How Much Does National Culture Constrain Organizational Culture?," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 241-259, July.
    12. Eaint Yadanar Oo & Heajung Jung & In-Jo Park, 2018. "Psychological Factors Linking Perceived CSR to OCB: The Role of Organizational Pride, Collectivism, and Person–Organization Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Alexandra Cotae & Laura Bacali, 2017. "The influence of national culture on business organizations' commitment to environment sustainability in the European Union," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 19-29, December.
    14. Barry Gerhart, 2009. "How Much Does National Culture Constrain Organizational Culture?," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 5(2), pages 241-259, July.
    15. Elodie Gentina & Pallavi Singh, 2015. "How National Culture and Parental Style Affect the Process of Adolescents’ Ecological Resocialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Linghui Kong & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Naveed Ahmad & Mariana Sehleanu & Zhihui Li & Malik Zia-Ud-Din & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "CSR as a Potential Motivator to Shape Employees’ View towards Nature for a Sustainable Workplace Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Tony R. Walker, 2020. "Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Nathalie Rodet-Kroichvili & Petia Koleva & Patricia David & Jana Marasova, 2010. "Is corporate social responsibility the privilege of developed market economies? Some evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Post-Print halshs-00514566, HAL.
    20. Petia Koleva & Nathalie Rodet-Kroichvili & Patricia David & Jana Marasova, 2010. "Is corporate social responsibility the privilege of developed market economies? Some evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Post-Print halshs-00728515, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Felipe Lillo-Viedma & Pedro Severino-González & Valentin Santander-Ramírez & Leidy Y. García & Nataly Guiñez-Cabrera & Nicolás Astorga-Bustos, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Network Analysis: Unionized Workers’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad & Syed Khuram Ali Jafri & Raja Irfan Sabir & Waris Ali Khan & Heesup Han, 2021. "The Inter-Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Servant Leadership, and Innovative Work Behavior in the Time of Crisis from the Healthcare Sector of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Petya Koleva & Maureen Meadows, 2021. "Inherited Scepticism and Neo-communist CSR-washing: Evidence from a Post-communist Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(4), pages 783-804, December.
    5. Kaja Prystupa, 2017. "The Role of Organizational Culture in KnowledgeManagement in Small Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 151-173.
    6. Asif Mahmood & Rana Tahir Naveed & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Khalique & Mohammad Adnan, 2021. "Unleashing the Barriers to CSR Implementation in the SME Sector of a Developing Economy: A Thematic Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Khurshid Djalilov & Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "The spirit is willing, but the institutions are weak: disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the financial sector in transition," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 385-427, June.
    8. Haila Ibrahim Altwaian, 2019. "Communicating Trust in Multicultural Teams: A case Study of International Organisations in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 5(6), pages 351-364.
    9. Mehrnaz Ashrafi & Gregory M. Magnan & Michelle Adams & Tony R. Walker, 2020. "Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Albin Skog & Örjan Sölvell, 2020. "The dark side of agglomeration, sustained wealth and transposition of trading institutions—the case of Bordeaux in the 18th and 19th centuries," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 67-91.
    11. Faisal Mahmood & Faisal Qadeer & Usman Sattar & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Maria Saleem & Jaffar Aman, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Financial Performance: A New Insight," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez & Emilio Abad-Segura & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2020. "Examining the Research Evolution on the Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions on University Social Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-30, July.
    13. Naveed Ahmad & Asif Mahmood & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Mohi ud Din & Ghazanfar Iqbal Khan & Zia Ullah, 2021. "Sustainability as a “New Normal” for Modern Businesses: Are SMEs of Pakistan Ready to Adopt It?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Krivogorsky, Victoria & Mintchik, Natalia & Alon, Anna, 2023. "Accounting research in former Soviet bloc countries: Past trends and current and future developments," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    15. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale & Angelo Di Gregorio & Samuel Adomako, 2022. "Corporate social performance and non‐financial reporting in the cruise industry: Paving the way towards UN Agenda 2030," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1931-1953, November.
    16. François Maon & Valérie Swaen & Adam Lindgreen, 2017. "One Vision, Different Paths: An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in Europe," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 405-422, June.
    17. Maria LOGHIN & Răzvan Cătălin DOBREA & Octavian Mihai PERPELEA, 2022. "SWOT Analysis and Key Actors in the Field of CSR," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 246-257, June.
    18. Meier, Matthias & Weller, Ingo, 2010. "Wissensmanagement und unternehmensinterner Wissenstransfer," Discussion Papers 2010/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    19. Seong-Gak Lee & Hyeon-Jin Jo & Dong-Woo Koo & Sae-Mi Lee, 2022. "Conceptual Similarities and Empirical Differences in Theoretical Approaches to Personal Values and Cultural Values Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior in Hospitality and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Beili Li & Xu Fan & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Jacob Cherian & László Vasa, 2021. "CSR and Workplace Autonomy as Enablers of Workplace Innovation in SMEs through Employees: Extending the Boundary Conditions of Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2226-:d:750380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.