IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13956-d954890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Trends and Characteristics of Railway Research

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Da Fonseca-Soares

    (Brazilian Company of Urban Trains, Square Napoleao Laureano, 01, Varadouro, João Pessoa 58010-150, Brazil
    Department of Geographical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenue Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50670-901, Brazil
    Civil Engineering Department, University of Granada, Campus de Fuentenueva, s/n. E.T.S Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Josicleda Domiciano Galvinicio

    (Department of Geographical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenue Professor Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife 50670-901, Brazil)

  • Sayonara Andrade Eliziário

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Federal University of Paraíba, Campus I, Castelo Branco III, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Angel Fermin Ramos-Ridao

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Granada, Campus de Fuentenueva, s/n. E.T.S Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

A retrospective bibliometric analysis of the railway sector covering the 20-year period between 2002 and 2021 was carried out to better understand the characteristics of the railway research. The Scopus database contained 1918 articles published with the keywords “Rail System”. VOSviewer software was used to create network maps from each of the variables studied. The results showed a huge increase in the number of publications over this period—notably, work written by Zhang, Y.T., who was found to be the most productive author. Engineering was found to be the most studied subject area of knowledge; Transportation Research Record was the journal with the highest number of publications; and China was revealed to be the leading country regarding this research field, Southwest Jiaotong University being the leading institution in this topic. Finally, there was a lack of research on the environmental impact and sustainability of railway systems, an area that could be opened up for future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Da Fonseca-Soares & Josicleda Domiciano Galvinicio & Sayonara Andrade Eliziário & Angel Fermin Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Trends and Characteristics of Railway Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13956-:d:954890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Knowles, Richard & Ferbrache, Fiona, 2016. "Evaluation of wider economic impacts of light rail investment on cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 430-439.
    2. Whittington, Dale & Cook, Joseph, 2019. "Valuing Changes in Time Use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(S1), pages 51-72, April.
    3. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2010. "Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(3), pages 495-506, March.
    4. Hong, Liu & Ouyang, Min & Xu, Min & Hu, Peipei, 2020. "Time-varied accessibility and vulnerability analysis of integrated metro and high-speed rail systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Cools, Mario & Fabbro, Yannick & Bellemans, Tom, 2016. "Free public transport: A socio-cognitive analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 96-107.
    6. Doru A. Nicola & Marc A. Rosen & Cornelia A. Bulucea & Constantin Brandusa, 2010. "Some Sustainability Aspects of Energy Conversion in Urban Electric Trains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Amanda Fernandes Ferreira & Yuka Akasaka & Mirian Greiner de Oliveira Pinheiro & S. K. Jason Chang, 2020. "Information as the First Attribute of Accessibility: A Method for Assessing the Information Provided by Urban Rail Systems to Tourists with Reduced Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-28, December.
    9. Jaime Larumbe, 2021. "Evaluating Sustainability of Mass Rapid Transit Stations in Dubai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Neil Cuthill & Mengqiu Cao & Yuqi Liu & Xing Gao & Yuerong Zhang, 2019. "The Association between Urban Public Transport Infrastructure and Social Equity and Spatial Accessibility within the Urban Environment: An Investigation of Tramlink in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Zhengdong Huang & Ming Zhang & Xuejun Liu, 2017. "Estimating light-rail transit peak-hour boarding based on accessibility at station and route levels in Wuhan, China," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 624-639, July.
    12. Jennifer D. Roberts & Ming Hu & Brit Irene Saksvig & Micah L. Brachman & Casey P. Durand, 2018. "Examining the Influence of a New Light Rail Line on the Health of a Demographically Diverse and Understudied Population within the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area: A Protocol for a Natural Experime," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Barbara B. Brown & Wyatt A. Jensen & Doug Tharp, 2019. "Residents’ expectations for new rail stops: optimistic neighborhood perceptions relate to subsequent transit ridership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 125-146, February.
    14. Ad A.M. Prins & Rodrigo Costas & Thed N. van Leeuwen & Paul F. Wouters, 2016. "Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 264-270.
    15. Jackson Sekasi & Mauro Luiz Martens, 2021. "Assessing the Contributions of Urban Light Rail Transit to the Sustainable Development of Addis Ababa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Pérez-Martínez, P.J. & Miranda, R.M. & Andrade, M.F., 2020. "Freight road transport analysis in the metro São Paulo: Logistical activities and CO2 emissions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 16-33.
    17. Alberto Martín-Martín & Mike Thelwall & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2021. "Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 871-906, January.
    18. Kristian Olesen, 2020. "Infrastructure imaginaries: The politics of light rail projects in the age of neoliberalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(9), pages 1811-1826, July.
    19. Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh & Mulley, Corinne, 2015. "Identifying preferences for public transport investments under a constrained budget," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-46.
    20. Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh & Mulley, Corinne, 2015. "Identifying resident preferences for bus-based and rail-based investments as a complementary buy in perspective to inform project planning prioritisation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.
    21. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Yazdi, Asieh Haieri, 2019. "Technological frames and the politics of automated electric Light Rail Rapid Transit in Poland and the United Kingdom," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    22. Alberto Martín-Martín & Mike Thelwall & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2021. "Correction to: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 907-908, January.
    23. Wenjia Zhu & Jiancheng Guan, 2013. "A bibliometric study of service innovation research: based on complex network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1195-1216, March.
    24. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    25. Zimny-Schmitt, Daniel & Goetz, Andrew R., 2020. "An investigation of the performance of urban rail transit systems on the corridor level: A comparative analysis in the American west," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahsan, Nabeel & Hewage, Kasun & Razi, Faran & Hussain, Syed Asad & Sadiq, Rehan, 2023. "A critical review of sustainable rail technologies based on environmental, economic, social, and technical perspectives to achieve net zero emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Mariko Almeida Carneiro & Diogo Da Fonseca-Soares & Lucian Hendyo Max Pereira & Angel Firmín Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "An Approach for Water and Energy Savings in Public Buildings: A Case Study of Brazilian Rail Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Gerasimov & Binita KC & Armin Mehrabian & James Acker & Michael P. McGuire, 2024. "Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 3681-3704, July.
    2. Ramón A. Feenstra & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2022. "Philosophers’ appraisals of bibliometric indicators and their use in evaluation: from recognition to knee-jerk rejection," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2085-2103, April.
    3. Weishu Liu & Meiting Huang & Haifeng Wang, 2021. "Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4541-4550, May.
    4. Rui Liang & Xichuan Zheng & Po-Hsun Wang & Jia Liang & Linhui Hu, 2023. "Research Progress of Carbon-Neutral Design for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    5. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Mike Thelwall, 2021. "Alternative medicines worth researching? Citation analyses of acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and osteopathy 1996–2017," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8731-8747, October.
    7. Sam Arts & Nicola Melluso & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2023. "Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text," Papers 2309.16437, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    8. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    9. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    10. Jua Cilliers & Shanaka Herath & Sumita Ghosh, 2024. "Going Back to School: Reflecting on School Space as “Shared Space” to Shape Cities and Communities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    11. Anting Wang & Mohd Nizam Osman & Megat Al-Imran Yasin & Nurul Ain Mohd Hasan & Ying Cui, 2024. "Tracing Evolution and Communication Dynamics in Chinese Independent Documentary Films (2012-2022): A Systematic Review of Genre, Censorship, Culture, and Distribution," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 368-381, March.
    12. Gabriel Alves Vieira & Jacqueline Leta, 2024. "biblioverlap: an R package for document matching across bibliographic datasets," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4513-4527, July.
    13. Christopher Hansen & Holger Steinmetz & Jörn Block, 2022. "How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Elena Andriollo & Alberto Caimo & Laura Secco & Elena Pisani, 2021. "Collaborations in Environmental Initiatives for an Effective “Adaptive Governance” of Social–Ecological Systems: What Existing Literature Suggests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    15. Tessmann, R. & Elbert, R., 2022. "Multi sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132320, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Kelly Gerakoudi-Ventouri, 2022. "Review of studies of blockchain technology effects on the shipping industry," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. da Fonseca, André Luís A. & Campos, Roberta D., 2021. "The cultural intertwining of consumption and entrepreneurship: A selective review of qualitative studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 149-162.
    18. John Yang & Sang-Uk Jung, 2024. "Harnessing FinTech for Sustainable Finance in Developing Countries: An Integrated SWOT–Multi-Level Perspective Analysis of Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Philip Hallinger & Sujitra Jayaseelan & Mark W. Speece, 2024. "The Evolution of Educating for Sustainable Development in East Asia: A Bibliometric Review, 1991–2023," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Michael Gusenbauer, 2022. "Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2683-2745, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13956-:d:954890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.