IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i2p333-d131797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Influence of a New Light Rail Line on the Health of a Demographically Diverse and Understudied Population within the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area: A Protocol for a Natural Experiment Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer D. Roberts

    (Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Ming Hu

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Brit Irene Saksvig

    (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Micah L. Brachman

    (Center for Geospatial Information Science, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Casey P. Durand

    (Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA)

Abstract

Approximately two-thirds of adults and youth in Prince George’s County, Maryland, a suburb of Washington, D.C. are overweight or obese and less than half are achieving daily physical activity recommendations. Active transportation (AT), such as walking, biking or using public transportation (PT), is a strategic pathway to improving physical activity levels and thus reducing excess weight. Utilizing an expansion of the Washington, D.C. area transportation system with a new light rail line, the Purple Line Outcomes on Transportation (PLOT) Study will exam pre- and post-Purple Line PT use, AT behaviors and attitudes and physical activity among Prince George’s County adults and youth. The PLOT Study will take advantage of this natural experiment in an area enduring significant racial/ethnic and gender-based overweight or obesity and physical inactivity disparities. While similar natural experiments on AT have been conducted in other U.S. cities, those studies lacked diverse and representative samples. To effectively evaluate these physical activity outcomes among this population, efforts will be used to recruit African American and Latino populations, the first and second most common racial/ethnic groups in Prince George’s County. Finally, the PLOT Study will also examine how contextual effects (e.g., neighborhood built environment) impact PT, AT and physical activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer D. Roberts & Ming Hu & Brit Irene Saksvig & Micah L. Brachman & Casey P. Durand, 2018. "Examining the Influence of a New Light Rail Line on the Health of a Demographically Diverse and Understudied Population within the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area: A Protocol for a Natural Experime," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:333-:d:131797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/2/333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manaugh, Kevin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2013. "Does distance matter? Exploring the links among values, motivations, home location, and satisfaction in walking trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 198-208.
    2. Melissa Bopp & Vikash V. Gayah & Matthew E. Campbell, 2015. "Examining the Link Between Public Transit Use and Active Commuting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Brown, B.B. & Werner, C.M. & Tribby, C.P. & Miller, H.J. & Smith, K.R., 2015. "Transit use, physical activity, and body mass index changes: Objective measures associated with complete street light-rail construction," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(7), pages 1468-1474.
    4. Marie‐Soleil Cloutier & Jacques Bergeron & Philippe Apparicio, 2011. "Predictors of Parental Risk Perceptions: The Case of Child Pedestrian Injuries in School Context," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 312-323, February.
    5. Saelens, B.E. & Moudon, A.V. & Kang, B. & Hurvitz, P.M. & Zhou, C., 2014. "Relation between higher physical activity and public transit use," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 854-859.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diogo Da Fonseca-Soares & Josicleda Domiciano Galvinicio & Sayonara Andrade Eliziário & Angel Fermin Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Trends and Characteristics of Railway Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freya MacMillan & Emma S. George & Xiaoqi Feng & Dafna Merom & Andrew Bennie & Amelia Cook & Taren Sanders & Genevieve Dwyer & Bonnie Pang & Justin M. Guagliano & Gregory S. Kolt & Thomas Astell-Burt, 2018. "Do Natural Experiments of Changes in Neighborhood Built Environment Impact Physical Activity and Diet? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Steven Spears & Marlon G Boarnet & Douglas Houston, 2017. "Driving reduction after the introduction of light rail transit: Evidence from an experimental-control group evaluation of the Los Angeles Expo Line," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2780-2799, September.
    3. Gao, Yanan & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry & Wang, Yuanqing, 2018. "Trip stage satisfaction of public transport users: A reference-based model incorporating trip attributes, perceived service quality, psychological disposition and difference tolerance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 759-775.
    4. Xu Wang & Jingni Song & Qunqi Wu, 2021. "An Economic Equilibrium Model for Optimizing Passenger Transport Corridor Mode Structure Based on Travel Surplus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jiankun Yang & Min He & Mingwei He, 2022. "Exploring the Group Difference in the Nonlinear Relationship between Commuting Satisfaction and Commuting Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    7. Ivan Parise & Penelope Abbott & Steven Trankle, 2021. "Drivers to Obesity—A Study of the Association between Time Spent Commuting Daily and Obesity in the Nepean Blue Mountains Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Md. Kamruzzaman & Simon Washington & Douglas Baker & Wendy Brown & Billie Giles-Corti & Gavin Turrell, 2016. "Built environment impacts on walking for transport in Brisbane, Australia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 53-77, January.
    9. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Wang, Fenglong & Mao, Zidan & Wang, Donggen, 2020. "Residential relocation and travel satisfaction change: An empirical study in Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 341-353.
    11. Shadi O. Tehrani & Shuling J. Wu & Jennifer D. Roberts, 2019. "The Color of Health: Residential Segregation, Light Rail Transit Developments, and Gentrification in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Alfonso Montella & Salvatore Chiaradonna & Alessandro Claudi de Saint Mihiel & Gord Lovegrove & Pietro Nunziante & Maria Rella Riccardi, 2022. "Sustainable Complete Streets Design Criteria and Case Study in Naples, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    13. Calvin P Tribby & Harvey J Miller & Barbara B Brown & Carol M Werner & Ken R Smith, 2017. "Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(6), pages 1145-1167, November.
    14. Jennifer D. Roberts & Sandra Mandic & Craig S. Fryer & Micah L. Brachman & Rashawn Ray, 2019. "Between Privilege and Oppression: An Intersectional Analysis of Active Transportation Experiences Among Washington D.C. Area Youth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Uba, Chijioke Dike & Chatzidakis, Andreas, 2016. "Understanding engagement and disengagement from pro-environmental behaviour: The role of neutralization and affirmation techniques in maintaining persistence in and desistance from car use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 278-294.
    16. Kolodinsky, Jane M. & Battista, Geoffrey & Roche, Erin & Lee, Brian H.Y. & Johnson, Rachel K., 2017. "Estimating the effect of mobility and food choice on obesity in a rural, northern environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 30-39.
    17. Joewono, Tri B. & Tarigan, Ari K.M. & Susilo, Yusak O., 2016. "Road-based public transportation in urban areas of Indonesia: What policies do users expect to improve the service quality?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 114-124.
    18. Jianxi Feng, 2016. "The Built Environment and Active Travel: Evidence from Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Jinhyun Hong & Cynthia Chen, 2014. "The role of the built environment on perceived safety from crime and walking: examining direct and indirect impacts," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1171-1185, November.
    20. De Vos, Jonas & Witlox, Frank, 2017. "Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 364-373.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:333-:d:131797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.