IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9796-d883406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of Sustainable Manufacturing Solutions: Tools for Enabling Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Athar Ajaz Khan

    (ELKH-PE Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, Hungary)

  • János Abonyi

    (ELKH-PE Complex Systems Monitoring Research Group, University of Pannonia, 8200 Veszprem, Hungary)

Abstract

At the current worrisome rate of global consumption, the linear economy model of producing goods, using them, and then disposing of them with no thought of the environmental, social, or economic consequences, is unsustainable and points to a deeply flawed manufacturing framework. Circular economy (CE) is presented as an alternative framework to address the management of emissions, scarcity of resources, and economic sustainability such that the resources are kept ‘in the loop’. In the context of manufacturing supply chains (SCs), the 6R’s of rethink, refuse, reduce, reuse, repair, and recycle have been proposed in line with the achievement of targeted net-zero emissions. In order to bring that about, the required changes in the framework for assessing the state of manufacturing SCs with regard to sustainability are indispensable. Verifiable and empirical model-based approaches such as modeling and simulation (M&S) techniques find pronounced use in realizing the ideal of CE. The simulation models find extensive use across various aspects of SCs, including analysis of the impacts, and support for optimal re-design and operation. Using the PRISMA framework to sift through published research, as gathered from SCOPUS, this review is based on 202 research papers spanning from 2015 to the present. This review provides an overview of the simulation tools being put to use in the context of sustainability in the manufacturing SCs, such that various aspects and contours of the collected research articles spanning from 2015 to the present, are highlighted. This article focuses on the three major simulation techniques in the literature, namely, Discrete Event Simulation (DES), Agent-Based Simulation (ABS), and System Dynamics (SD). With regards to their application in manufacturing SCs, each modeling technique has its pros and its cons which are evinced in case of data requirement, model magnification, model resolution, and environment interaction, among others. These limitations are remedied through use of hybrids wherein two or more than two modeling techniques are applied for the desired results. The article also indicates various open-source software solutions that are being employed in research and the industry. This article, in essence, has three objectives. First to present to the prospective researchers, the current state of research, the concerns that have been presented in the field of sustainability modeling, and how they have been resolved. Secondly, it serves as a comprehensive bibliography of peer-reviewed research published from 2015–2022 and, finally, indicating the limitations of the techniques with regards to sustainability assessment. The article also indicates the necessity of a new M&S framework and its prerequisites.

Suggested Citation

  • Athar Ajaz Khan & János Abonyi, 2022. "Simulation of Sustainable Manufacturing Solutions: Tools for Enabling Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-40, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9796-:d:883406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maroua Nouiri & Damien Trentesaux & Abdelghani Bekrar, 2019. "Towards Energy Efficient Scheduling of Manufacturing Systems through Collaboration between Cyber Physical Production and Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-30, November.
    2. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    3. Janya Chanchaichujit & José F. Saavedra-Rosas, 2018. "Using Simulation Tools to Model Renewable Resources," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-55816-5, July.
    4. Yasamin Eslami & Mario Lezoche & Hervé Panetto & Michele Dassisti, 2021. "On analysing sustainability assessment in manufacturing organisations: a survey," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(13), pages 4108-4139, July.
    5. An, Li, 2012. "Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 25-36.
    6. Cassettari, Lucia & Bendato, Ilaria & Mosca, Marco & Mosca, Roberto, 2017. "Energy Resources Intelligent Management using on line real-time simulation: A decision support tool for sustainable manufacturing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 841-851.
    7. Giuseppe Munda, 2016. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 1235-1267, Springer.
    8. Doluweera, Ganesh & Hahn, Fabian & Bergerson, Joule & Pruckner, Marco, 2020. "A scenario-based study on the impacts of electric vehicles on energy consumption and sustainability in Alberta," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Zhangqi, Zhong & Zhuli, Chen & Lingyun, He, 2022. "Technological innovation, industrial structural change and carbon emission transferring via trade-------An agent-based modeling approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    11. J Stoldt & A Schlegel & M Putz, 2016. "Enhanced integration of energy-related considerations in discrete event simulation for manufacturing applications," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 113-122, May.
    12. Utomo, Dhanan Sarwo & Onggo, Bhakti Stephan & Eldridge, Stephen, 2018. "Applications of agent-based modelling and simulation in the agri-food supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 794-805.
    13. Medoh Chuks Nnamdi & Arnesh Telukdarie, 2020. "Enhancing enterprise resource planning and manufacturing execution system efficiency: a simulation-based decision support approach," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 297-320.
    14. David L. McCollum & Wenji Zhou & Christoph Bertram & Harmen-Sytze Boer & Valentina Bosetti & Sebastian Busch & Jacques Després & Laurent Drouet & Johannes Emmerling & Marianne Fay & Oliver Fricko & Sh, 2018. "Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 589-599, July.
    15. Petrit (Pete) Dode & Michael Greig & Saeed Zolfaghari & W. Patrick Neumann, 2016. "Integrating human factors into discrete event simulation: a proactive approach to simultaneously design for system performance and employees’ well being," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 3105-3117, May.
    16. Pérez-Pérez, Juan Fernando & Parra, Juan Felipe & Serrano-García, Jakeline, 2021. "A system dynamics model: Transition to sustainable processes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Ali Bagheri & Peder Hjorth, 2007. "Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 83-96.
    18. Morgan, Jennifer Sian & Howick, Susan & Belton, Valerie, 2017. "A toolkit of designs for mixing Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 907-918.
    19. Xiao, Qinge & Li, Congbo & Tang, Ying & Pan, Jian & Yu, Jun & Chen, Xingzheng, 2019. "Multi-component energy modeling and optimization for sustainable dry gear hobbing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Noha M. Galal & Ahmed F. Abdul Moneim, 2015. "A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Optimal Sustainable Product Mix for the Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, September.
    21. Lei Shi & Gang Guo & Xiaohui Song, 2021. "Multi-agent based dynamic scheduling optimisation of the sustainable hybrid flow shop in a ubiquitous environment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(2), pages 576-597, January.
    22. David L. McCollum & Wenji Zhou & Christoph Bertram & Harmen-Sytze Boer & Valentina Bosetti & Sebastian Busch & Jacques Després & Laurent Drouet & Johannes Emmerling & Marianne Fay & Oliver Fricko & Sh, 2018. "Author Correction: Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 699-699, August.
    23. Bashir Salah & Mustufa Haider Abidi & Syed Hammad Mian & Mohammed Krid & Hisham Alkhalefah & Ali Abdo, 2019. "Virtual Reality-Based Engineering Education to Enhance Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    24. G Dagkakis & C Heavey, 2016. "A review of open source discrete event simulation software for operations research," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 193-206, August.
    25. Dimitris Mourtzis, 2020. "Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1927-1949, April.
    26. Qianting Zhu & Keran Duan & Jing Wu & Zheng Wang, 2016. "Agent-Based Modeling of Global Carbon Trading and Its Policy Implications for China in the Post-Kyoto Era," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 1348-1360, June.
    27. Devrim Murat Yazan & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Luca Fraccascia, 2020. "Learning strategic cooperative behavior in industrial symbiosis: A game‐theoretic approach integrated with agent‐based simulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2078-2091, July.
    28. Hosang Jung & Sukjae Jeong, 2018. "The Economic Effect of Virtual Warehouse-Based Inventory Information Sharing for Sustainable Supplier Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    29. Caner Erden & Halil Ibrahim Demir & Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, 2019. "Solving Integrated Process Planning, Dynamic Scheduling, and Due Date Assignment Using Metaheuristic Algorithms," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-19, May.
    30. Mihalis Giannakis & Michalis Louis, 2016. "A Multi-Agent Based System with Big Data Processing for Enhanced Supply Chain Agility," Post-Print hal-01353916, HAL.
    31. Windisch, Johannes & Väätäinen, Kari & Anttila, Perttu & Nivala, Mikko & Laitila, Juha & Asikainen, Antti & Sikanen, Lauri, 2015. "Discrete-event simulation of an information-based raw material allocation process for increasing the efficiency of an energy wood supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 315-325.
    32. Zhao, G.Y. & Liu, Z.Y. & He, Y. & Cao, H.J. & Guo, Y.B., 2017. "Energy consumption in machining: Classification, prediction, and reduction strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 142-157.
    33. Lohmer, Jacob & Bugert, Niels & Lasch, Rainer, 2020. "Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    34. Sauvageau, Gabriel & Frayret, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Waste paper procurement optimization: An agent-based simulation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 987-998.
    35. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Ghassemi Toosi, Farshad & Heavey, Cathal, 2018. "A multi-agent systems approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation in a partnership supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 286-301.
    36. Silviu Raileanu & Florin Anton & Alexandru Iatan & Theodor Borangiu & Silvia Anton & Octavian Morariu, 2017. "Resource scheduling based on energy consumption for sustainable manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1519-1530, October.
    37. Devrim Murat Yazan & Luca Fraccascia, 2020. "Sustainable operations of industrial symbiosis: an enterprise input-output model integrated by agent-based simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 392-414, January.
    38. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    39. Andrew Greasley & John Steven Edwards, 2021. "Enhancing discrete-event simulation with big data analytics: A review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 247-267, February.
    40. Anthony Halog & Yosef Manik, 2011. "Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-31, February.
    41. Sam Solaimani & Alireza Parandian & Nabi Nabiollahi, 2021. "A Holistic View on Sustainability in Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing: A Comparative Empirical Study of Eyewear Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    42. Simon Gorecki & Jalal Possik & Gregory Zacharewicz & Yves Ducq & Nicolas Perry, 2020. "A Multicomponent Distributed Framework for Smart Production System Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    43. Anand, Nilesh & van Duin, Ron & Tavasszy, Lorant, 2021. "Carbon credits and urban freight consolidation: An experiment using agent based simulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    44. Elmar Kiesling & Markus Günther & Christian Stummer & Lea Wakolbinger, 2012. "Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 183-230, June.
    45. Muaz Niazi & Amir Hussain, 2011. "Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(2), pages 479-499, November.
    46. Sudarto, Sumarsono & Takahashi, Katsuhiko & Morikawa, Katsumi, 2017. "Efficient flexible long-term capacity planning for optimal sustainability dimensions performance of reverse logistics social responsibility: A system dynamics approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 179-192.
    47. Raquel Lopes Oliveira & Liliane Dolores Fagundes & Renato da Silva Lima & Marcelo Montaño, 2020. "Discrete event simulation to aid decision-making and mitigation in solid waste management," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 67-85, January.
    48. Alice Rondini & Fabiana Tornese & Maria Grazia Gnoni & Giuditta Pezzotta & Roberto Pinto, 2017. "Hybrid simulation modelling as a supporting tool for sustainable product service systems: a critical analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6932-6945, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Issam A. R. Moghrabi & Sameer Ahmad Bhat & Piotr Szczuko & Rawan A. AlKhaled & Muneer Ahmad Dar, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Its Influence on Sustainable Manufacturing and Business Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-35, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rizzati, Massimiliano & Landoni, Matteo, 2024. "A systematic review of agent-based modelling in the circular economy: Insights towards a general model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 617-631.
    2. Emanuele Borgonovo & Marco Pangallo & Jan Rivkin & Leonardo Rizzo & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 52-94, March.
    3. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    4. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.
    5. Ozdemir, Ali Can & Buluş, Kurtuluş & Zor, Kasım, 2022. "Medium- to long-term nickel price forecasting using LSTM and GRU networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Thomas Vempiliyath & Maitri Thakur & Vincent Hargaden, 2021. "Development of a Hybrid Simulation Framework for the Production Planning Process in the Atlantic Salmon Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Dahlen, Niklas & Fehrenkötter, Rieke & Schreiter, Maximilian, 2024. "The new bond on the block — Designing a carbon-linked bond for sustainable investment projects," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 316-325.
    8. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    11. Huber, Robert & Bakker, Martha & Balmann, Alfons & Berger, Thomas & Bithell, Mike & Brown, Calum & Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne & Xiong, Hang & Le, Quang Bao & Mack, Gabriele & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Millingt, 2018. "Representation of decision-making in European agricultural agent-based models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 143-160.
    12. Noeldeke, Beatrice & Winter, Etti & Ntawuhiganayo, Elisée Bahati, 2022. "Representing human decision-making in agent-based simulation models: Agroforestry adoption in rural Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Joëlle Noailly & Roger Smeets, 2022. "Financing Energy Innovation: Internal Finance and the Direction of Technical Change," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 145-169, September.
    14. Wu, Qingyang & Wang, Yanying, 2022. "How does carbon emission price stimulate enterprises' total factor productivity? Insights from China's emission trading scheme pilots," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Marco Due~nas & Antoine Mandel, 2024. "Are EU low-carbon structural funds efficient in reducing emissions?," Papers 2408.01782, arXiv.org.
    16. Pan, Xunzhang & Ma, Xueqing & Zhang, Yanru & Shao, Tianming & Peng, Tianduo & Li, Xiang & Wang, Lining & Chen, Wenying, 2023. "Implications of carbon neutrality for power sector investments and stranded coal assets in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Lin, Yuanxiong & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Peng, Michael Yao-Ping & Irfan, Muhammad, 2023. "Assessment of renewable energy, financial growth and in accomplishing targets of China's cities carbon neutrality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1082-1091.
    18. Perdana, Sigit & Vielle, Marc, 2022. "Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Nirvikar Singh, 2022. "India’s Strategy for Achieving Net Zero," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    20. Xu, Liming & Mak, Stephen & Brintrup, Alexandra, 2021. "Will bots take over the supply chain? Revisiting agent-based supply chain automation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9796-:d:883406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.