IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i10p13085-13103d56382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Optimal Sustainable Product Mix for the Process Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Noha M. Galal

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), AbuKir Campus, Alexandria 1029, Egypt)

  • Ahmed F. Abdul Moneim

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), AbuKir Campus, Alexandria 1029, Egypt)

Abstract

The increasing concerns about the environment and the depletion of natural resources are the main drivers for the growing interest in sustainability. Manufacturing operations are frequently considered to have an adverse effect on the environment. Hence, the sustainable operation of manufacturing facilities is a vital practice to ensure sustainability. The aim of this paper is to find the optimum product mix of a manufacturing facility to maximize its sustainability. A mixed integer non-linear programming model is developed to specify the product mix in order to maximize a proposed sustainability index (SI) of a manufacturing facility. The sustainability index comprises the economic, environmental and social pillars of sustainability in a weighted form using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The model results allow the identification of the prospective improvements of manufacturing sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Noha M. Galal & Ahmed F. Abdul Moneim, 2015. "A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Optimal Sustainable Product Mix for the Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:10:p:13085-13103:d:56382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/10/13085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/10/13085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc A. Rosen & Hossam A. Kishawy, 2012. "Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Zhuming Bi, 2011. "Revisiting System Paradigms from the Viewpoint of Manufacturing Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Letmathe, Peter & Balakrishnan, Nagraj, 2005. "Environmental considerations on the optimal product mix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 398-412, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Galera-Zarco & José Antonio Campos, 2021. "Exploring Servitization in Industrial Construction: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Toly Chen, 2016. "Competitive and Sustainable Manufacturing in the Age of Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Anderson Hoose & Víctor Yepes & Moacir Kripka, 2021. "Selection of Production Mix in the Agricultural Machinery Industry Considering Sustainability in Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Xilin Zhang & Yuejin Tan & Zhiwei Yang, 2018. "Rework Quantification and Influence of Rework on Duration and Cost of Equipment Development Task," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Irina G. Ershova & Farida F. Galimulina & Alla A. Yarlychenko, 2021. "Innovative Mesosystems Algorithm for Sustainable Development Priority Areas Identification in Industry Based on Decision Trees Construction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2023. "Analysis of indicators used for measuring industrial sustainability: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1979-2005, March.
    7. Athar Ajaz Khan & János Abonyi, 2022. "Simulation of Sustainable Manufacturing Solutions: Tools for Enabling Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-40, August.
    8. Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Jianbin Sun & Jiang Jiang & Yuejin Tan, 2017. "Sustainable Production Line Evaluation Based on Evidential Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Ebru Saygili & Elif Uye Akcan & Yucel Ozturkoglu, 2023. "An Exploratory Analysis of Sustainability Indicators in Turkish Small- and Medium-Sized Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Shib Sankar Sana, 2022. "A structural mathematical model on two echelon supply chain system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1997-2025, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Abubakr & Adel T. Abbas & Italo Tomaz & Mahmoud S. Soliman & Monis Luqman & Hussien Hegab, 2020. "Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Marc A. Rosen, 2013. "Engineering and Sustainability: Attitudes and Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Aleksandar Subic & Bahman Shabani & Mehdi Hedayati & Enda Crossin, 2013. "Performance Analysis of the Capability Assessment Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Zhang, XiaoLi & Liu, ChenGuang & Li, WenJuan & Evans, Steve & Yin, Yong, 2017. "Effects of key enabling technologies for seru production on sustainable performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 290-307.
    5. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.
    6. Metin Türkay & Öztürk Saraçoğlu & Mehmet Can Arslan, 2016. "Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: Aggregate Planning from Sustainability Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Jungmin An & Dong-Kwan Kim & Jinyeong Lee & Sung-Kwan Joo, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Xilin Zhang & Yuejin Tan & Zhiwei Yang, 2018. "Rework Quantification and Influence of Rework on Duration and Cost of Equipment Development Task," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Hariyani, Dharmendra & Mishra, Sanjeev & Hariyani, Poonam & Sharma, Milind Kumar, 2023. "Drivers and motives for sustainable manufacturing system," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 2(1).
    10. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao & Zhengjun Wan & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Marc A. Rosen, 2018. "Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Pablo David Necoechea-Porras & Asunción López & Juan Carlos Salazar-Elena, 2021. "Deregulation in the Energy Sector and Its Economic Effects on the Power Sector: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Evgeny Chupakhin & Olga Babich & Stanislav Sukhikh & Svetlana Ivanova & Ekaterina Budenkova & Olga Kalashnikova & Alexander Prosekov & Olga Kriger & Vyacheslav Dolganyuk, 2022. "Bioengineering and Molecular Biology of Miscanthus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Yanfen Mu & Feng Niu, 2022. "To Be or Not to Be? Strategic Analysis of Carbon Tax Guiding Manufacturers to Choose Low-Carbon Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Tyas Yuli Rosiani & Dana Marsetiya Utama & Ameilia Yuniar Ummudiyah & Ikhlasul Amallynda, 2024. "Sustainable Manufacturing Assessment using Sustainable VSM and AHP involving Workload and Machine Efficiency: A Case Study in Indonesian Paving Block Production," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 2049-2071, September.
    15. Chang, Xiangyun & Xia, Haiyang & Zhu, Huiyun & Fan, Tijun & Zhao, Hongqing, 2015. "Production decisions in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system with carbon cap and trade mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 160-173.
    16. Letmathe, Peter & Wagner, Sandra, 2018. "“Messy” marginal costs: Internal pricing of environmental aspects on the firm level," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 41-52.
    17. Alhamzah Alnoor & Bilal Eneizan & Hebah Zaki Makhamreh & Ibrahim Ali Rahoma, 2019. "The Effect of Reverse Logistics on Sustainable Manufacturing," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 71-79, January.
    18. Pedro Castellón Patiño, 2018. "José Agustín Blanco Barros (1922 - 2016) : Un Provinciano Universal," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, ejms_v3_i.
    19. Liangjie Xia & Tingting Guo & Juanjuan Qin & Xiaohang Yue & Ning Zhu, 2018. "Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 149-175, September.
    20. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:10:p:13085-13103:d:56382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.