IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9395-d877476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Phytogenic Additives on Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance of Nellore Bulls Raised in Grassland

Author

Listed:
  • Ronyatta Weich Teobaldo

    (Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14887-900, Brazil)

  • Abmael da Silva Cardoso

    (Ona Range Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona, FL 33865, USA)

  • Thais Ribeiro Brito

    (Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14887-900, Brazil)

  • Rhaony Gonçalves Leite

    (Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14887-900, Brazil)

  • Eliéder Prates Romanzini

    (Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14887-900, Brazil)

  • Yury Tatiana Granja-Salcedo

    (Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA), Bogotá 250047, Colombia)

  • Ricardo Andrade Reis

    (Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal 14887-900, Brazil)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the intake and digestibility of nutrients, emission of enteric CH 4 , and productive performance of Nellore bulls grazing Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu palisade grass pastures during the rainy season, receiving an energy supplement or mineral supplement, with or without the inclusion of phytogenic additives. Forty-eight Nellore bulls were treated with: (1) energy supplement without the inclusion of phytogenic additives; (2) energy supplement with the inclusion of phytogenic additives; (3) mineral supplement without the inclusion of phytogenic additives; and (4) mineral supplement with the inclusion of phytogenic additives. Consumption of total dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), apNDF, and energy; digestibility of DM, CP, and energy; average daily gain; stocking rate; and gain per area were higher in animals consuming energy supplements than those consuming mineral supplements. Digestibility of DM, NDF, and energy levels were lower in animals that consumed phytogenic additives. Compared with mineral supplements, the supply of energy supplements provides higher nutrient intake, increases enteric CH 4 emission, and improves nutrient digestibility, providing a greater productive performance. The inclusion of phytogenic additives negatively affected nutrient intake and digestibility, did not reduce enteric CH 4 emission, and influenced productive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronyatta Weich Teobaldo & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Thais Ribeiro Brito & Rhaony Gonçalves Leite & Eliéder Prates Romanzini & Yury Tatiana Granja-Salcedo & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2022. "Response of Phytogenic Additives on Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance of Nellore Bulls Raised in Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9395-:d:877476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Rondineli Pavezzi Barbero & Eliéder Prates Romanzini & Ronyatta Weich Teobaldo & Fernando Ongaratto & Marcia Helena Machado da Rocha Fernandes & Ana Cláudia Ruggieri & Ricard, 2020. "Intensification: A Key Strategy to Achieve Great Animal and Environmental Beef Cattle Production Sustainability in Brachiaria Grasslands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Cardoso, Abmael S. & Berndt, Alexandre & Leytem, April & Alves, Bruno J.R. & de Carvalho, Isabel das N.O. & de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique & Urquiaga, Segundo & Boddey, Robert M., 2016. "Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 86-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Angélica Santos Rabelo de Souza Bahia & Juliana Duarte Messana & Eduardo Festozo Vicente & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2023. "Additive Tannins in Ruminant Nutrition: An Alternative to Achieve Sustainability in Animal Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Pastori D’Aurea & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Yuri Santa Rosa Guimarães & Lauriston Bertelli Fernandes & Luis Eduardo Ferreira & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2021. "Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Production in Brazil through Animal Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Ymène Fouli & Margot Hurlbert & Roland Kröbel, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Canadian Agriculture: Estimates and Measurements," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(35), November.
    3. Vogel, Everton & Martinelli, Gabrielli & Artuzo, Felipe Dalzotto, 2021. "Environmental and economic performance of paddy field-based crop-livestock systems in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Adriane Terezinha Schneider & Rosangela Rodrigues Dias & Mariany Costa Deprá & Darissa Alves Dutra & Richard Luan Silva Machado & Cristiano Ragagnin de Menezes & Leila Queiroz Zepka & Eduardo Jacob-Lo, 2024. "The Intersectionality Between Amazon and Commodities Production: A Close Look at Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Mosnier, Claire & Duclos, Anne & Agabriel, Jacques & Gac, Armelle, 2017. "Orfee: A bio-economic model to simulate integrated and intensive management of mixed crop-livestock farms and their greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 202-215.
    6. Dakpo, K Hervé & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Agri-environmental subsidies and French suckler cow farms’ technical efficiency accounting for GHGs," Working Papers 245192, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    7. Dumas, Patrice & Wirsenius, Stefan & Searchinger, Tim & Andrieu, Nadine & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2022. "Options to achieve net-zero emissions from agriculture and land use changes in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12385, Inter-American Development Bank.
    8. Calvano, Maria Paula Cavuto Abrão & Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro & Barros, Jacqueline Cavalcante & Garcia, Marcos Valério & Martins, Kauê Rodriguez & Andreotti, Renato, 2021. "Bioeconomic simulation of Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in different beef cattle production systems in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Maciel, Isabella C.F. & Barbosa, Fabiano A. & Alves, Bruno J.R. & Alvarenga, Ramon C. & Tomich, Thierry R. & Campanha, Mônica M. & Rowntree, Jason E. & Alves, Filipe C. & Lana, Ângela M.Q., 2021. "Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from beef cattle excreta deposited on feedlot pen surface in tropical conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Searchinger, Timothy D. & Beringer, Tim & Strong, Asa, 2017. "Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 434-446.
    11. Alexandre C. Köberle & Pedro R. R. Rochedo & André F. P. Lucena & Alexandre Szklo & Roberto Schaeffer, 2020. "Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2 °C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1823-1842, October.
    12. Natalia Vilas Boas Fonseca & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Angélica Santos Rabelo de Souza Bahia & Juliana Duarte Messana & Eduardo Festozo Vicente & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2023. "Additive Tannins in Ruminant Nutrition: An Alternative to Achieve Sustainability in Animal Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Monjardino, Marta & Loi, Angelo & Thomas, Dean T. & Revell, Clinton K. & Flohr, Bonnie M. & Llewellyn, Rick S. & Norman, Hayley C., 2022. "Improved legume pastures increase economic value, resilience and sustainability of crop-livestock systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    15. Raúl Lorenzo González Marcillo & Walter Efraín Castro Guamàn & Angela Edith Guerrero Pincay & Plutarco Antonio Vera Zambrano & Nelson René Ortiz Naveda & Santiago Alexander Guamàn Rivera, 2021. "Assessment of Guinea Grass Panicum maximum under Silvopastoral Systems in Combination with Two Management Systems in Orellana Province, Ecuador," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Pedro Henrique Presumido & Fernando Sousa & Artur Gonçalves & Tatiane Cristina Dal Bosco & Manuel Feliciano, 2018. "Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Patrice Dumas & Stefan Wirsenius & Tim Searchinger & Nadine Andrieu & Adrien Vogt-Schilb, 2022. "Options to achieve net - zero emissions from agriculture and land use changes in Latin America and the Caribbean," Post-Print halshs-03760573, HAL.
    18. Costa Jr., Newton Borges da & Baldissera, Tiago Celso & Pinto, Cassiano Eduardo & Garagorry, Fabio Cervo & Moraes, Aníbal de & Carvalho, Paulo César de Faccio, 2019. "Public policies for low carbon emission agriculture foster beef cattle production in southern Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 269-273.
    19. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis Gustavo & Hall, J. A. Julian & Moretti, Antonio Carlos & Fonseca Veloso, Rui & Alexander, Peter & Crespolini, Mariane & Moran, Dominic, 2017. "Sustainable intensification of Brazilian livestock production through optimized pasture restoration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 201-211.
    20. Alexandre C. Köberle & Vassilis Daioglou & Pedro Rochedo & André F. P. Lucena & Alexandre Szklo & Shinichiro Fujimori & Thierry Brunelle & Etsushi Kato & Alban Kitous & Detlef P. Vuuren & Roberto Scha, 2022. "Can global models provide insights into regional mitigation strategies? A diagnostic model comparison study of bioenergy in Brazil," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 1-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9395-:d:877476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.