IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i2p117-d491493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Guinea Grass Panicum maximum under Silvopastoral Systems in Combination with Two Management Systems in Orellana Province, Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Raúl Lorenzo González Marcillo

    (Grupo de Investigación Causana Yachay, Escuela Superior Politècnica de Chimborazo, Sede Orellana, El Coca 220150, Ecuador)

  • Walter Efraín Castro Guamàn

    (Grupo de Investigación Causana Yachay, Escuela Superior Politècnica de Chimborazo, Sede Orellana, El Coca 220150, Ecuador)

  • Angela Edith Guerrero Pincay

    (Grupo de Investigación Causana Yachay, Escuela Superior Politècnica de Chimborazo, Sede Orellana, El Coca 220150, Ecuador)

  • Plutarco Antonio Vera Zambrano

    (Consultor Independiente sobre Sistemas Agroforestales Orellana, El Coca 170518, Ecuador)

  • Nelson René Ortiz Naveda

    (Grupo de Investigación Causana Yachay, Escuela Superior Politècnica de Chimborazo, Sede Orellana, El Coca 220150, Ecuador)

  • Santiago Alexander Guamàn Rivera

    (Grupo de Investigación en Rumiantes (G2R), Departamento de Ciencia Animal y de los Alimentos, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Climate change has increased the interannual and seasonal variation in the average temperature and precipitation rate, which determine forage availability globally. Similar patterns of change have occurred in tropical regions, and Ecuador is no exception. This region includes other influencing factors, such as the conversion of tropical forests to extensive pastures. Therefore, this study was carried out to evaluate guinea grass ( Panicum maximum ) cultivated under silvopastoral systems with different management strategies in both of the seasons of the study region in Ecuador (rainy season and dry season). A randomized complete block design was used for the experiment, with three repetitions and three treatments. Agronomic measures, forage production, chemical composition, animal responses, and soil properties were evaluated. Data were analyzed with the Mixed model of SAS. Differences in all evaluated parameters were observed between treatments, and silvopastoral systems (SPSs) produced better results than conventional grass monoculture. Furthermore, there was a strong seasonal effect on forage production, chemical composition, and soil properties. Therefore, management of Panicum maximum with well-planned grazing can enhance animal responses and help to retain natural resources, lowering the pressure on forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Raúl Lorenzo González Marcillo & Walter Efraín Castro Guamàn & Angela Edith Guerrero Pincay & Plutarco Antonio Vera Zambrano & Nelson René Ortiz Naveda & Santiago Alexander Guamàn Rivera, 2021. "Assessment of Guinea Grass Panicum maximum under Silvopastoral Systems in Combination with Two Management Systems in Orellana Province, Ecuador," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:117-:d:491493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristian Vasco & Rodrigo Valdiviezo & Herman Hernández & Valdano Tafur & David Eche & Estefanía Jácome, 2020. "Off-Farm Employment, Forest Clearing and Natural Resource Use: Evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Rondineli Pavezzi Barbero & Eliéder Prates Romanzini & Ronyatta Weich Teobaldo & Fernando Ongaratto & Marcia Helena Machado da Rocha Fernandes & Ana Cláudia Ruggieri & Ricard, 2020. "Intensification: A Key Strategy to Achieve Great Animal and Environmental Beef Cattle Production Sustainability in Brachiaria Grasslands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Torres, Bolier & Günter, Sven & Acevedo-Cabra, Ricardo & Knoke, Thomas, 2018. "Livelihood strategies, ethnicity and rural income: The case of migrant settlers and indigenous populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 22-34.
    4. Thony Huera-Lucero & Juana Labrador-Moreno & José Blanco-Salas & Trinidad Ruiz-Téllez, 2020. "A Framework to Incorporate Biological Soil Quality Indicators into Assessing the Sustainability of Territories in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, April.
    5. Ojeda Luna, Tatiana & Zhunusova, Eliza & Günter, Sven & Dieter, Matthias, 2020. "Measuring forest and agricultural income in the Ecuadorian lowland rainforest frontiers: Do deforestation and conservation strategies matter?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel & Gelson dos Santos Difante & Alexandre Romeiro de Araujo & Denise Baptaglin Montagner & Valeria Pacheco Batista Euclides & Manoel Gustavo Paranhos da Silva, 2020. "Carbon and Nitrogen Stocks and Soil Quality in an Area Cultivated with Guinea Grass under the Residual Effect of Nitrogen Doses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Emmanuel Lievio de Lima Veras & Gelson dos Santos Difante & Antonio Leandro Chaves Gurgel & Ana Beatriz Graciano da Costa & Jéssica Gomes Rodrigues & Carolina Marques Costa & João Virginio Emerenciano, 2020. "Tillering and Structural Characteristics of Panicum Cultivars in the Brazilian Semiarid Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasco, Cristian & Torres, Bolier & Jácome, Estefanía & Torres, Alexandra & Eche, David & Velasco, Christian, 2021. "Use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in frontier areas: A case study in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Wiebe, Pia Christine & Zhunusova, Eliza & Lippe, Melvin & Ferrer Velasco, Rubén & Günter, Sven, 2022. "What is the contribution of forest-related income to rural livelihood strategies in the Philippines' remaining forested landscapes?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Lippe, Melvin & Rummel, Lisa & Günter, Sven, 2022. "Simulating land use and land cover change under contrasting levels of policy enforcement and its spatially-explicit impact on tropical forest landscapes in Ecuador," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Meyer, Maximilian & Hulke, Carolin & Kamwi, Jonathan & Kolem, Hannah & Börner, Jan, 2022. "Spatially heterogeneous effects of collective action on environmental dependence in Namibia’s Zambezi region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. André Pastori D’Aurea & Abmael da Silva Cardoso & Yuri Santa Rosa Guimarães & Lauriston Bertelli Fernandes & Luis Eduardo Ferreira & Ricardo Andrade Reis, 2021. "Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Production in Brazil through Animal Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Nansikombi, Hellen & Fischer, Richard & Ferrer Velasco, Rubén & Lippe, Melvin & Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe & Kabwe, Gillian & Günter, Sven, 2020. "Can de facto governance influence deforestation drivers in the Zambian Miombo?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Aurelio Garc?a-Garc?a, 2022. "The limits to growth of buen vivir socialism: Ecuador?s alternative development model from 2007 to 2017," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 11(1), pages 25-59.
    8. Iravani, Samaneh & Kakhki, Mahmoud Daeshvar & Ghorbani, Mohammad & Karbasi, Alireza, 2019. "Determinants of Rural Non-Farm Employment in Neyshabur: Application of Multilevel Multinomial Logit Model," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2).
    9. P. P. Braga, Daniel & Pokorny, Benno & Porro, Roberto & Vidal, Edson, 2023. "Good life in the Amazon? A critical reflection on the standard of living of cocoa and cattle-based smallholders in Pará, Brazil," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    10. Jang-Hwan Jo & Taewoo Roh & Seunguk Shin & Yeo-Chang Youn, 2019. "Sustainable Assets and Strategies Affecting the Forestry Household Income: Empirical Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Bolier Torres & Jhenny Cayambe & Susana Paz & Kelly Ayerve & Marco Heredia-R & Emma Torres & Marcelo Luna & Theofilos Toulkeridis & Antón García, 2022. "Livelihood Capitals, Income Inequality, and the Perception of Climate Change: A Case Study of Small-Scale Cattle Farmers in the Ecuadorian Andes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Fischer, Richard & Lippe, Melvin & Dolom, Priscilla & Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe & Tamayo, Fabian & Torres, Bolier, 2023. "Effectiveness of policy instrument mixes for forest conservation in the tropics – Stakeholder perceptions from Ecuador, the Philippines and Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Ali Akbar Barati & Milad Zhoolideh & Mostafa Moradi & Eydieh Sohrabi Mollayousef & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Multidimensional poverty and livelihood strategies in rural Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12963-12993, November.
    14. Kazungu, Moses & Ferrer Velasco, Rubén & Zhunusova, Eliza & Lippe, Melvin & Kabwe, Gillian & Gumbo, Davison J. & Günter, Sven, 2021. "Effects of household-level attributes and agricultural land-use on deforestation patterns along a forest transition gradient in the Miombo landscapes, Zambia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. L'Roe, Jessica & Shanley Barr, Grayson & Detoeuf, Diane & Wieland, Michelle & Ikati, Bernard & Enduyi Kimuha, Moïse & Sandrin, François & Bilua, Delphin & Bondeko, Gerard & Londza, Yves & Bakabana, Pa, 2023. "Comparing forest product harvest rates and livelihood activities among migrant and Indigenous households in the Congo Basin," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Jin, Shaoze & Min, Shi & Huang, Jikun & Waibel, Hermann, 2021. "Falling price induced diversification strategies and rural inequality: Evidence of smallholder rubber farmers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Bolier Torres & Cristian Vasco & Sven Günter & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Determinants of Agricultural Diversification in a Hotspot Area: Evidence from Colonist and Indigenous Communities in the Sumaco Biosphere Reserve, Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Martins, Angelina R.O. & Shackleton, Charlie M., 2022. "The contribution of wild palms to the livelihoods and diversification of rural households in southern Mozambique," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Londres, Marina & Schmink, Marianne & Börner, Jan & Duchelle, Amy E. & Frey, Gabriel Ponzoni, 2023. "Multidimensional forests: Complexity of forest-based values and livelihoods across Amazonian socio-cultural and geopolitical contexts," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:117-:d:491493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.