IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7359-d840029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Environmental Sustainability Also “Economically Efficient”? The Case of the “SOStain” Certification for Sicilian Sparkling Wines

Author

Listed:
  • Marzia Ingrassia

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Stefania Chironi

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Lo Grasso

    (Co.Re.R.A.S.—Consorzio Regionale per la Ricerca Applicata e la Sperimentazione, 90143 Palermo, Italy)

  • Luciano Gristina

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Nicola Francesca

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Simona Bacarella

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Pietro Columba

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

  • Luca Altamore

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

The Italian wine industry is strongly committed to sustainability. Among the numerous sustainability certifications and programs implemented in Italy for the wine sector, SOStain is the oldest at the regional level. The SOStain Foundation promotes the voluntary application of a sustainability program, developed in 2010 in Sicily (Southern Italy). The requirements of the SOStain specifications are connected to the new CAP 2023–2027 objectives; therefore, companies preparing for the new challenges of future winemaking might be interested in joining the SOStain Foundation for greening production practices. The objective of this study was to learn producers’ and consumers’ opinions about motivations, real/perceived difficulties, cost, and positive effects of the SOStain certification, as well as their intentions to make ethical choices and their willingness to spend more for a Sicilian sparkling wine with the SOStain certification. A census of producers combined with a consumer survey and focus groups were carried out. Multidimensional scaling was used to discover the polarization of producers’/consumers’ opinions regarding the SOStain certification. The findings highlighted the effect of ethical choices, despite sensory likings, on purchasing intentions and issues related to higher costs of production and market prices. The results highlighted the criticalities of the green transition for wineries and the importance of correct communication through social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzia Ingrassia & Stefania Chironi & Giuseppe Lo Grasso & Luciano Gristina & Nicola Francesca & Simona Bacarella & Pietro Columba & Luca Altamore, 2022. "Is Environmental Sustainability Also “Economically Efficient”? The Case of the “SOStain” Certification for Sicilian Sparkling Wines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7359-:d:840029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugenio Pomarici & Alessandro Corsi & Simonetta Mazzarino & Roberta Sardone, 2021. "The Italian Wine Sector: Evolution, Structure, Competitiveness and Future Challenges of an Enduring Leader," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(2), pages 259-295, July.
    2. Chiara Corbo & Lucrezia Lamastra & Ettore Capri, 2014. "From Environmental to Sustainability Programs: A Review of Sustainability Initiatives in the Italian Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Pappalardo, Gioacchino & West, Grant Howard & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Toscano, Sabrina & Pecorino, Biagio, 2022. "The effect of a UNESCO world heritage site designation on willingness to pay to preserve an agri-environmental good: The case of the dry stone walls in Mt. Etna," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Letizia Bindi & Mauro Conti & Angelo Belliggiano, 2022. "Sense of Place, Biocultural Heritage, and Sustainable Knowledge and Practices in Three Italian Rural Regeneration Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Ana Trigo & Paula Silva, 2022. "Sustainable Development Directions for Wine Tourism in Douro Wine Region, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Stefania Chironi & Simona Bacarella & Luca Altamore & Pietro Columba & Marzia Ingrassia, 2017. "Study of product repositioning for the Marsala Vergine DOC wine," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(1/2), pages 118-138.
    7. Sarah Williams & Anja Schaefer, 2013. "Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises and Sustainability: Managers' Values and Engagement with Environmental and Climate Change Issues," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 173-186, March.
    8. Alan Matthews, 2020. "The new CAP must be linked more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, December.
    9. Carla Zarbà & Gaetano Chinnici & Giovanni La Via & Salvatore Bracco & Biagio Pecorino & Mario D’Amico, 2021. "Regulatory Elements on the Circular Economy: Driving into the Agri-Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Arthur P. J. Mol & Peter Oosterveer, 2015. "Certification of Markets, Markets of Certificates: Tracing Sustainability in Global Agro-Food Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Spencer Henson & John Humphrey, 2010. "Understanding the Complexities of Private Standards in Global Agri-Food Chains as They Impact Developing Countries," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1628-1646.
    12. Marko Lovec & Tanja Šumrada & Emil Erjavec, 2020. "New CAP Delivery Model, Old Issues," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 55(2), pages 112-119, March.
    13. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Wine consumers' demand for social sustainability labeling: Evidence for the fair labor claim," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1742-1761, December.
    14. Eugenio Pomarici & Roberta Sardone, 2020. "EU wine policy in the framework of the CAP: post-2020 challenges," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-40, December.
    15. Panico, Teresa & Caracciolo, Francesco & Furno, Marilena, 2022. "Analysing the consumer purchasing behaviour for certified wood products in Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Adeline Alonso Ugaglia & Jean-Marie Cardebat & Alessandro Corsi (ed.), 2019. "The Palgrave Handbook of Wine Industry Economics," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-98633-3, April.
    17. Wang, Yiqin & Wang, Jingbin & Han, Dan & Lv, Shanshan & Chen, Mo & Yin, Shijiu, 2022. "The interaction relationships among agricultural certification labels or brands: evidence from Chinese consumer preference for fresh produce," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    18. Beaulieu, Nancy Dean, 2002. "Quality information and consumer health plan choices," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 43-63, January.
    19. Prescott, Craig & Pilato, Manuela & Bellia, Claudio, 2020. "Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Piero Mastroberardino & Giuseppe Calabrese & Flora Cortese & Miriam Petracca, 2022. "Social Commerce in the Wine Sector: An Exploratory Research Study of the Italian Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianni Betti & Daniela Evangelista & Francesca Gagliardi & Emanuele Giordano & Angelo Riccaboni, 2024. "Towards Integrating Information Systems of Statistical Indicators on Traceability, Quality and Safety of Italian Agrifood Systems for Citizens, Institutions and Policy-Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Bellia & Pietro Columba & Marzia Ingrassia, 2022. "The Brand–Land Identity of Etna Volcano Valley Wines: A Policy Delphi Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Filippis, Fabrizio De & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Pineiro, Cristina, 2021. "The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315147, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Paola Corsinovi, 2021. "Consumer Taxes on Alcohol: Is the Wine Sector a Niche Within the Alcoholic Beverages?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(2), pages 341-348, July.
    6. Julian M. Alston & Davide Gaeta, 2021. "Reflections on the Political Economy of European Wine Appellations," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(2), pages 219-258, July.
    7. Eugenio Pomarici & Alessandro Corsi & Simonetta Mazzarino & Roberta Sardone, 2021. "The Italian Wine Sector: Evolution, Structure, Competitiveness and Future Challenges of an Enduring Leader," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(2), pages 259-295, July.
    8. Marcello Stanco & Marco Lerro, 2020. "Consumers’ Preferences for and Perception of CSR Initiatives in the Wine Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Ivana Alpeza & Ivan Nižić & Zrinka Lukač, 2023. "What Influences Croatian Consumers’ Wine Choice?," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 35(1), pages 41-56.
    10. Anna Carbone, 2021. "From Flasks to Fine Glasses: Recent Trends in Wine Economics," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(2), pages 187-198, July.
    11. Wedig, Gerard J. & Tai-Seale, Ming, 2002. "The effect of report cards on consumer choice in the health insurance market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1031-1048, November.
    12. Sam Hampton & Richard Blundel & Aqueel Wahga & Tina Fawcett & Christopher Shaw, 2022. "Transforming small and medium‐sized enterprises to address the climate emergency: The case for values‐based engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1424-1439, September.
    13. Elena Toma & Paula Stoicea & Carina Dobre & Adina Iorga, 2023. "The Effect of Eco-Scheme Support on Romanian Farms—A Gini Index Decomposition by Income Source at Farm Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, August.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11294 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Samuel Garrido, 2021. "Inequality and conflict as drivers of cooperation: the location of wine cooperatives in pre-1936 Spain," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 15(2), pages 443-476, May.
    16. Buchmueller, Thomas, 2006. "Price and the health plan choices of retirees," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 81-101, January.
    17. Mariana Senkiv & Jörn Schultheiß & Maximilian Tafel & Martin Reiss & Eckhard Jedicke, 2022. "Are Winegrowers Tourism Promoters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-10, June.
    18. Elisa Giuliani, 2016. "Human Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries’ Industrial Clusters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 39-54, January.
    19. Wang, Derek D. & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2018. "Climate change mitigation targets set by global firms: Overview and implications for renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 386-398.
    20. Castellari, Elena & Soregaroli, Claudio & Venus, Thomas J. & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 26-37.
    21. Zhao, Yue & Rogers, Sarah, 2024. "Tracing China’s agrochemical complex," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7359-:d:840029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.