IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6899-d832147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Impact of Sustainable Leadership and Core Competencies on Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Information Technology (IT) Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Nazir Taj Nisha

    (PG & Research Department of Commerce, Guru Nanak College, Chennai 600042, India)

  • Nishad Nawaz

    (Department of Business Management, College of Business Administration, Kingdom University, Riffa 3903, Bahrain)

  • Jayakumar Mahalakshmi

    (PG & Research Department of Commerce, Guru Nanak College, Chennai 600042, India)

  • Vijayakumar Gajenderan

    (Department of Commerce, Sir Theagaraya College, Chennai 600021, India)

  • Islam Hasani

    (ESLG College, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo)

Abstract

The study is focused on assessing the impact of sustainable leadership and core competencies on sustainable competitive advantage in the information technology sector. The data are sourced from primary and secondary data. The primary data are sourced from IT sector employees. The secondary information is sourced from earlier publications related to sustainable leadership, sustainable competitive advantage, and core competencies. The primary data were collected through the field survey method, although some were collected via an online mode. The sample size was 297. The study used a simple stratified random sampling technique. The study results described a significant effect of sustainable leadership on sustainable competitive advantage. Sustainable leadership improves the prospects of associations in terms of their creation, constant advancement, sustained competitive edge, and long-term success. Sustainable leadership is a wellspring of gaining the upper hand for associations. Sustainable leadership benefits associations, development, consistent improvement, a supported upper hand, and long haul achievement. The study also found that the core competencies significantly influence the competitive advantage. The discoveries of the current study have significant ramifications for customers, top administration, and policymakers. The practitioners of IT companies are urged to cultivate an inventive and open correspondence climate in their associations dependent on existing logical discoveries. Likewise, they could utilize the current outcomes as a benchmark for gradually expanding their qualities and limits, which may prompt better natural productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazir Taj Nisha & Nishad Nawaz & Jayakumar Mahalakshmi & Vijayakumar Gajenderan & Islam Hasani, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Sustainable Leadership and Core Competencies on Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Information Technology (IT) Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6899-:d:832147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivia Fachrunnisa & Ardian Adhiatma & Heru Kurnianto Tjahjono, 2020. "Cognitive Collective Engagement: Relating Knowledge-Based Practices and Innovation Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 743-765, June.
    2. Gheorghe BRANISTE & Viorica CALUGHER & Ecaterina LUNGU, 2018. "The Quality of Education and Training in the Context of Knowledge Based Society," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Veaceslav MANOLACHI & Cristian Mihail RUS & Svetlana RUSNAC (ed.), New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 8, pages 103-110, Editura Lumen.
    3. Kipper, Liane Mahlmann & Iepsen, Sandra & Dal Forno, Ana Julia & Frozza, Rejane & Furstenau, Leonardo & Agnes, Jéssica & Cossul, Danielli, 2021. "Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Adelaide Wilcox King & Carl P. Zeithaml, 2001. "Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 75-99, January.
    5. Mina Rohani & Nasser Shahrasbi & Yany Gregoire, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities and firm performance: the rise and fall of Charles Schwab," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 144-159, September.
    6. Olivier Boiral & Charles Baron & Olen Gunnlaugson, 2014. "Environmental Leadership and Consciousness Development: A Case Study Among Canadian SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 363-383, September.
    7. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Gayle Avery, 2016. "Sustainable Leadership Practices Driving Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Thai SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Olawale Fatoki, 2021. "Sustainable leadership and sustainable performance of hospitality firms in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 610-621, June.
    9. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless, 2006. "Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 99-115, June.
    10. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    11. Székely, Francisco & Knirsch, Marianna, 2005. "Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 628-647, December.
    12. Qaisar Iqbal & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Hasliza Abdul Halim, 2020. "How Does Sustainable Leadership Influence Sustainable Performance? Empirical Evidence From Selected ASEAN Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    13. Michael Robinson & Anne Kleffner & Stephanie Bertels, 2011. "Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 493-505, July.
    14. Sooksan Kantabutra & Prattana Punnakitikashem, 2020. "Exploring the Process Toward Corporate Sustainability at a Thai SME," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Kevin Gibson, 2012. "Stakeholders and Sustainability: An Evolving Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 15-25, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Boeske, 2023. "Leadership towards Sustainability: A Review of Sustainable, Sustainability, and Environmental Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Andrea Bencsik & Sylwia Pangsy-Kania, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership Practices Based on the Logic of the Honeybee Pyramid—Comparison of Hungarian and Polish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Krittawit Krittayaruangroj & Nacharee Iamsawan, 2022. "Sustainable Leadership Practices and Competencies of SMEs for Sustainability and Resilience: A Community-Based Social Enterprise Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Philip Hallinger & Suparak Suriyankietkaew, 2018. "Science Mapping of the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Leadership, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Anne Sebastian & Matthias P. Hühn, 2024. "Sustainable Leadership and Hegelian Self-Awareness," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Andrea Bencsik & Sylwia Pangsy-Kania, 2023. "Sustainable Leadership Practices Based on the Logic of the Honeybee Pyramid—Comparison of Hungarian and Polish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Louis W. Fry & Eleftheria Egel, 2021. "Global Leadership for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Inese Lusena-Ezera & Veronika Bikse & Sintija Pusaudze & Baiba Rivza & Laura Pole, 2023. "The Role of Sustainable Leadership in Promoting the Visibility of the Territories Represented by the Tourism Information Centres of Latvian State Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Aline Elias & Karin Sanders & Jing Hu, 2023. "The Sustainable Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes Link: An HR Process Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Gayle Avery, 2016. "Sustainable Leadership Practices Driving Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Thai SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Min-Seong Kim & Brijesh Thapa, 2018. "Relationship of Ethical Leadership, Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Ariana Chang & Tian-Shyug Lee & Hsiu-Mei Lee & Jing Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Responsible Leadership on Strategic Agility: Cases from the Taiwan Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Bilal Afsar & Ahsen Maqsoom & Asad Shahjehan & Sajjad Ahmad Afridi & Adnan Nawaz & Hassan Fazliani, 2020. "Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 297-312, January.
    13. Arnaldo Camuffo & Federica Stefano & Chiara Paolino, 2017. "Safety Reloaded: Lean Operations and High Involvement Work Practices for Sustainable Workplaces," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 245-259, June.
    14. Sooksan Kantabutra & Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn, 2021. "Toward an Organizational Theory of Resilience: An Interim Struggle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-28, November.
    15. Cheng, Ken & Wei, Feng & Lin, Yinghui, 2019. "The trickle-down effect of responsible leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of leader-follower value congruence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 34-43.
    16. Sven Horak & Bindu Arya & Kiran M Ismail, 2018. "Organizational Sustainability Determinants in Different Cultural Settings: A Conceptual Framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 528-546, May.
    17. Qaisar Iqbal & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Yongmei Li, 2021. "Sustainable Leadership in Frontier Asia Region: Managerial Discretion and Environmental Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Seçil Bal Taştan & Seyed Mehdi Mousavi Davoudi, 2019. "The relationship between socially responsible leadership and organisational ethical climate: in search for the role of leader's relational transparency," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 275-299.
    19. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    20. Wei Xuecheng & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Qaisar Iqbal & Bai Saina, 2022. "Responsible Leadership and Sustainable Development in East Asia Economic Group: Application of Social Exchange Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6899-:d:832147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.