IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4085-d531241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Categorizing Bicycling Environment Quality Based on Mobile Sensor Data and Bicycle Flow Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Bian

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Ling Li

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Huan Zhang

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Dandan Xu

    (Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning and Design, Beijing 100045, China
    School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Jian Rong

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Jiachuan Wang

    (Beijing Transportation Information Center, Beijing 100073, China)

Abstract

The bicycle is a healthy and sustainable transport mode due to its emission-free characteristics. To increase bicycle use, it is fundamental to provide bicycle-friendly environments. To better monitor bicycle environments, this study proposed the concept of bicycling environment quality (BEQ), which was defined by perceived satisfaction and conflict level. Data collection was conducted at 19 road segments in five sites located in Beijing, China. Then, speed-related and acceleration-related bicycling behavior indicators (BBIs) were extracted from data collected using sensors on mobile phones, while bicycling environment indicators (BEIs), such as bicycle flow, were extracted from recorded data. Taking the BBIs and BEIs as input attributes, a two-level BEQ classification assessment model based on a random forest (RF) algorithm was constructed. The proposed RF-based classification assessment model was able to produce approximately 77.35% overall correct classification. The results demonstrate the feasibility of using GPS data in evaluating BEQ. In addition, a novel dockless bicycle-sharing system (DBS)-based framework for bicycle traffic monitoring is discussed, which is of great significance in the sustainable development of bicycles. This study provides a theoretical method for objective BEQ assessment. It can further be used by planners and road administrators to monitor and improve BEQ and by individual cyclists for optimal route choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Bian & Ling Li & Huan Zhang & Dandan Xu & Jian Rong & Jiachuan Wang, 2021. "Categorizing Bicycling Environment Quality Based on Mobile Sensor Data and Bicycle Flow Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4085-:d:531241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khashayar Kazemzadeh & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Lena Winslott Hiselius & Enrico Ronchi, 2020. "Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Behrendt, Frauke, 2016. "Why cycling matters for Smart Cities. Internet of Bicycles for Intelligent Transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 157-164.
    3. Thomas Götschi & Jan Garrard & Billie Giles-Corti, 2016. "Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 45-71, January.
    4. Wei Wang & Zhentian Sun & Liya Wang & Shanshan Yu & Jun Chen, 2020. "Evaluation Model for the Level of Service of Shared-Use Paths Based on Traffic Conflicts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Joo, Shinhye & Oh, Cheol, 2013. "A novel method to monitor bicycling environments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Pucher, John & Buehler, Ralph & Seinen, Mark, 2011. "Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 451-475, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Nikiforiadis & Socrates Basbas & Foteini Mikiki & Aikaterini Oikonomou & Efrosyni Polymeroudi, 2021. "Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Spaces Level of Service: Comparison of Methodologies and Critical Discussion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Michał Adam Kwiatkowski & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Jadwiga Biegańska, 2021. "Could It Be a Bike for Everyone? The Electric Bicycle in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Hudde, Ansgar, 2023. "It's the mobility culture, stupid! Winter conditions strongly reduce bicycle usage in German cities, but not in Dutch ones," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Ziwen Ling & Christopher R. Cherry & John H. MacArthur & Jonathan X. Weinert, 2017. "Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Calvey, J.C. & Shackleton, J.P. & Taylor, M.D. & Llewellyn, R., 2015. "Engineering condition assessment of cycling infrastructure: Cyclists’ perceptions of satisfaction and comfort," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 134-143.
    6. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Sebastian Kussl & Andreas Wald, 2022. "Smart Mobility and its Implications for Road Infrastructure Provision: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Zhu, Siying & Zhu, Feng, 2019. "Cycling comfort evaluation with instrumented probe bicycle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 217-231.
    9. John Stehlin, 2015. "Cycles of Investment: Bicycle Infrastructure, Gentrification, and the Restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 121-137, January.
    10. Braun, Lindsay M. & Rodriguez, Daniel A. & Gordon-Larsen, Penny, 2019. "Social (in)equity in access to cycling infrastructure: Cross-sectional associations between bike lanes and area-level sociodemographic characteristics in 22 large U.S. cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. An, Ran & Zahnow, Renee & Pojani, Dorina & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2019. "Weather and cycling in New York: The case of Citibike," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-112.
    12. Mário Meireles & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro, 2020. "Digital Platform/Mobile App to Boost Cycling for the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility in Mid-Sized Starter Cycling Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Emma McDougall & Brian Doucet, 2022. "Polarized Paths: ‘Selling’ Cycling in City and Suburb," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(2), pages 179-193, April.
    14. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    15. Silva, Cecília & Teixeira, João & Proença, Ana & Bicalho, Tamara & Cunha, Isabel & Aguiar, Ana, 2019. "Revealing the cycling potential of starter cycling cities: Usefulness for planning practice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 138-147.
    16. Peter Gordon & Wendell Cox, 2012. "Cities in Western Europe and the United States: do policy differences matter?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(2), pages 565-594, April.
    17. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Dalia Perkumienė & Rasa Pranskūnienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Jurgita Grigienė, 2020. "The Right to A Clean Environment: Considering Green Logistics and Sustainable Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Alexander Petre & Jeffrey Wagner, 2013. "Green Consumption under Misperceived Prices: An Application to Active Transportation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(1), pages 187-204, July.
    20. Frans Sengers, 2017. "Cycling the city, re-imagining the city: Envisioning urban sustainability transitions in Thailand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2763-2779, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4085-:d:531241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.