IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2755-d510102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Senior Consumer Motivations and Perceived Value of Robot Service Restaurants in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Kyu Kwak

    (Laboratory Microbial Physiology and Biotechnology, Department of Food and Nutrition, Institute of Food and Nutrition Science, Eulji University, 553 Sanseong-daero, Seongnam 13135, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • JeungSun Lee

    (Department of Mortuary Science, College of Bio Convergence, Eulji University, 553 Sanseong-daero, Seongnam 13135, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Seong-Soo Cha

    (Department of Food Science & Service, College of Bio-Convergence, Eulji University, 553 Sanseong-daero, Seongnam 13135, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

Abstract

This research empirically tested a theoretical model by defining senior customers’ intentions to use robot service restaurants emerging in South Korea. Non-face-to-face services have become increasingly important for seniors. Therefore, restaurant marketers should cater to senior customers’ needs by sustaining robot service restaurants. The study analyzed 243 questionnaires to verify the reliability and validity of the measurement items. The research hypotheses were examined using structural equation modeling (SEM). The suggested model comprised three stages: motivated consumer innovativeness (MCI), perceived value, and planned behavior (attitude, intention to use). The results revealed that senior customers’ perceived values positively influenced attitude and were enhanced by hedonically MCI (hMCI) and socially MCI. Moreover, the hedonic and social elements of motivation improved the attitude and usage intentions of robot service restaurants for senior customers. However, these relationships differed in terms of the income level of the customer groups. For the low-income senior-level group, hMCI was more influential on the perceived value. This study is meaningful because it analyzes the effect of MCI of seniors on the perceived value of robot service restaurants, which are growing rapidly in South Korea. It has empirically proved the moderating effect of different income groups, providing practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Kyu Kwak & JeungSun Lee & Seong-Soo Cha, 2021. "Senior Consumer Motivations and Perceived Value of Robot Service Restaurants in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2755-:d:510102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stock, Ruth & Oliveira, Pedro & Hippel, Eric von, 2015. "Impacts of the Hedonic and Utilitarian User Motives on the Innovativeness of User-Developed Solutions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77349, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Jeroen Schepers, 2020. "Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3-4), pages 203-225, March.
    3. Ha-Won Jang & Soo-Bum Lee, 2020. "Serving Robots: Management and Applications for Restaurant Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Stock, Ruth & Oliveira, Pedro & Hippel, Eric von, 2015. "Impacts of the Hedonic and Utilitarian User Motives on the Innovativeness of User-Developed Solutions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 71022, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Klopotan Igor & Vrhovec-Žohar Kristina & Mahič Edita, 2016. "Impact of Income on Customers' Loyalty: Are Customers with Higher Income more Loyal?," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 81-88, March.
    6. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2015. "Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 137-145.
    7. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    8. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    9. Ronan de Kervenoael & Rajibul Hasan & Alexandre Schwob & Edwin Goh, 2020. "Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots," Post-Print hal-02782265, HAL.
    10. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    11. Stock, Ruth & Oliveira, Pedro & Hippel, Eric von, 2015. "Impacts of the Hedonic and Utilitarian User Motives on the Innovativeness of User-Developed Solutions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 76764, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    12. Coleman, Richard P, 1983. "The Continuing Significance of Social Class to Marketing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(3), pages 265-280, December.
    13. Marianne Abramovici, 2004. "How to Take Customers into Consideration in Service Innovation Projects," Post-Print hal-01136394, HAL.
    14. Do The Khoa & Chen-Ya Wang & Priyanko Guchait, 2021. "Using regulatory focus to encourage physical distancing in services: when fear helps to deal with Mr. Deadly COVID-19," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1-2), pages 32-57, January.
    15. Stock, Ruth & Oliveira, Pedro & Hippel, Eric von, 2015. "Impacts of the Hedonic and Utilitarian User Motives on the Innovativeness of User-Developed Solutions," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 71821, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Marianne Abramovici & Laurence Bancel-Charensol, 2004. "How to take customers into consideration in service innovation projects," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 56-78, January.
    17. Allard, Thomas & Babin, Barry J. & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2009. "When income matters: Customers evaluation of shopping malls’ hedonic and utilitarian orientations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 40-49.
    18. Stock, Ruth & Merkle, Moritz, 2017. "A Service Robot Acceptance Model: User acceptance of humanoid robots during service encounters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 123630, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. (Boni) Li, Yushi & Perkins, Amanda, 2007. "The impact of technological developments on the daily life of the elderly," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 361-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinsoo Hwang & Jawad Abbas & Kyuhyeon Joo & Seung-Woo Choo & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2022. "The Effects of Types of Service Providers on Experience Economy, Brand Attitude, and Brand Loyalty in the Restaurant Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    3. Stanislav Ivanov & Craig Webster & Faruk Seyitoğlu, 2023. "Humans and/or robots? Tourists’ preferences towards the humans–robots mix in the service delivery system," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 195-231, March.
    4. Jinsoo Hwang & Heather Markham Kim & Kyuhyeon Joo & Muhammad Nawaz & Joonho Moon, 2022. "Travelers’ Perceived Value of Robot Services in the Airline Industry: Focusing on Demographic Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Kyuhyeon Joo & Heather M. Kim & Jinsoo Hwang, 2023. "A Study on the Experience Economy Examining a Robot Service in the Restaurant Industry Based on Demographic Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Baichen Jiang & Fallah Samuel Kassoh, 2022. "A Comparative Study of High-Quality Broiler Purchase Behavior between Chinese and Sierra Leonean Consumers: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty Avoidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Koh, Le Yi & Xia, Zhiyang & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of the autonomous robot in last-mile delivery: A combined perspective of resource-matching, perceived risk and value theories," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robson, Karen & Wilson, Matthew & Pitt, Leyland, 2019. "Creating new products from old ones: Consumer motivations for innovating autonomously from firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Stanko, Michael A. & Allen, B.J., 2022. "Disentangling the collective motivations for user innovation in a 3D printing community," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Jermain Kaminski & Christian Hopp & Christian Lukas, 2018. "Who benefits from the wisdom of the crowd in crowdfunding? Assessing the benefits of user-generated and mass personal electronic word of mouth in computer-mediated financing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(9), pages 1133-1162, December.
    4. Sakellariou, Evy & Karantinou, Kalipso & Goffin, Keith, 2020. "From user insights to user foresights: Applying video-based ethnographic narratives and user innovation in NPD," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Ebbing, Tobias & Lüthje, Christian, 2021. "Pricing decisions of consumer innovators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    6. Stock, Ruth Maria & von Hippel, Eric & Gillert, Nils Lennart, 2016. "Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 757-769.
    7. Orelj, Ana & Torfason, Magnus Thor, 2022. "They didn't ask: Online innovation communities as a latent dynamic capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Pollok, Patrick & Amft, André & Diener, Kathleen & Lüttgens, Dirk & Piller, Frank T., 2021. "Knowledge diversity and team creativity: How hobbyists beat professional designers in creating novel board games," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    9. Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa & Ollikainen, Markku, 2019. "Drivers of Participation in Gypsum Treatment of Fields as an Innovation for Water Protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 382-393.
    10. Rivieccio, Giorgia & Raïes, Karine & Schiavone, Francesco, 2023. "Are you attractive enough? An empirical analysis on user innovators' characteristics and the creation of new social ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Preißner, Stephanie & Raasch, Christina & Schweisfurth, Tim, 2017. "Is necessity the mother of disruption?," Kiel Working Papers 2097, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Afful-Dadzie, Eric & Lartey, Samuel Odame & Clottey, David Nii Klote, 2022. "Agricultural information systems acceptance and continuance in rural communities: A consumption values perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Ghasemzadeh, Khatereh & Bortoluzzi, Guido & Yordanova, Zornitsa, 2022. "Collaborating with users to innovate: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Yu, Xin & de Jong, Jeroen P.J., 2024. "An identity perspective on the diffusion of user innovations in the household sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    15. Abril, Carmen & Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M. & Camacho-Miñano, María-del-Mar, 2024. "Using gamification to overcome innovation process challenges: A literature review and future agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Svensson, Peter O. & Hartmann, Rasmus Koss, 2018. "Policies to promote user innovation: Makerspaces and clinician innovation in Swedish hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 277-288.
    17. Stanislav Ivanov & Faruk Seyitoğlu & Martina Markova, 2020. "Hotel managers’ perceptions towards the use of robots: a mixed-methods approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 505-535, December.
    18. Lukoschek, Carmen Sabrina & Stock-Homburg, Ruth Maria, 2021. "Integrating Home and Work: How the Work Environment Enhances Household-Sector Innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    19. Ezhil Kumar, Madhumitha & Sharma, Dheeraj P. & Tapar, Archit V., 2021. "Out-of-stock justifications and consumers’ behavioral outcomes– exploring the role of product type and sales level information in out-of-stock situations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Kosenius, A.-K. & Ollikainen, M., 2018. "Drivers of participation in gypsum treatment of fields as an innovation for water protection," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276048, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2755-:d:510102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.