IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2160-d500987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thinking Big and Thinking Small: A Conceptual Framework for Best Practices in Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Food, Energy, and Water Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Kliskey

    (Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • Paula Williams

    (Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • David L. Griffith

    (Center for Resilient Communities, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA)

  • Virginia H. Dale

    (Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)

  • Chelsea Schelly

    (Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA)

  • Anna-Maria Marshall

    (Department of Sociology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Valoree S. Gagnon

    (College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
    Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA)

  • Weston M. Eaton

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Kristin Floress

    (United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Evanston, IL 60201, USA)

Abstract

Community and stakeholder engagement is increasingly recognized as essential to science at the nexus of food, energy, and water systems (FEWS) to address complex issues surrounding food and energy production and water provision for society. Yet no comprehensive framework exists for supporting best practices in community and stakeholder engagement for FEWS. A review and meta-synthesis were undertaken of a broad range of existing models, frameworks, and toolkits for community and stakeholder engagement. A framework is proposed that comprises situational awareness of the FEWS place or problem, creation of a suitable culture for engagement, focus on power-sharing in the engagement process, co-ownership, co-generation of knowledge and outcomes, the technical process of integration, the monitoring processes of reflective and reflexive experiences, and formative evaluation. The framework is discussed as a scaffolding for supporting the development and application of best practices in community and stakeholder engagement in ways that are arguably essential for sound FEWS science and sustainable management.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Kliskey & Paula Williams & David L. Griffith & Virginia H. Dale & Chelsea Schelly & Anna-Maria Marshall & Valoree S. Gagnon & Weston M. Eaton & Kristin Floress, 2021. "Thinking Big and Thinking Small: A Conceptual Framework for Best Practices in Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Food, Energy, and Water Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2160-:d:500987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howarth, Candice & Monasterolo, Irene, 2016. "Understanding barriers to decision making in the UK energy-food-water nexus: The added value of interdisciplinary approaches," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 53-60.
    2. Dave D. White & J. Leah Jones & Ross Maciejewski & Rimjhim Aggarwal & Giuseppe Mascaro, 2017. "Stakeholder Analysis for the Food-Energy-Water Nexus in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Nexus Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Tomas M. Koontz, 2014. "Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: the importance of process control and efficacy," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 1572-1593, October.
    4. Ahmed, S.M. & Palermo, A.-G.S., 2010. "Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(8), pages 1380-1387.
    5. Melissa Jackson & Rodney A. Stewart & Kelly S. Fielding & Jessie Cochrane & Cara D. Beal, 2019. "Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Howarth, Candice & Monasterolo, Irene, 2017. "Opportunities for knowledge co-production across the energy-food-water nexus: Making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 103-110.
    7. Hoolohan, Claire & McLachlan, Carly & Larkin, Alice, 2019. "‘Aha’ moments in the water-energy-food nexus: A new morphological scenario method to accelerate sustainable transformation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Kala Saravanamuthu, 2018. "How risk information and stakeholder‐participation affect the sustainability of collaborative decisions: A case study on how the sustainability of stakeholder decisions is affected by different levels," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1067-1078, November.
    9. Uta Wehn & Kevin Collins & Kim Anema & Laura Basco-Carrera & Alix Lerebours, 2018. "Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 34-59, January.
    10. Bassel Daher & Rabi H. Mohtar & Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos & Kent E. Portney & Ronald Kaiser & Walid Saad, 2018. "Developing Socio-Techno-Economic-Political (STEP) Solutions for Addressing Resource Nexus Hotspots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Delphine Thizy & Claudia Emerson & Johanna Gibbs & Sarah Hartley & Lydia Kapiriri & James Lavery & Jeantine Lunshof & Janine Ramsey & Julie Shapiro & Jerome Amir Singh & Lea Pare Toe & Isabelle Coche , 2019. "Guidance on stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    12. William L. Hargrove & Josiah M. Heyman, 2020. "A Comprehensive Process for Stakeholder Identification and Engagement in Addressing Wicked Water Resources Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Emily Prehoda & Richelle Winkler & Chelsea Schelly, 2019. "Putting Research to Action: Integrating Collaborative Governance and Community-Engaged Research for Community Solar," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alison Deviney & Khara Grieger & Ashton Merck & John Classen & Anna-Maria Marshall, 2023. "Phosphorus sustainability through coordinated stakeholder engagement: a perspective," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 371-378, September.
    2. Daniel Cronan & E. Jamie Trammell & Andrew (Anaru) Kliskey & Paula Williams & Lilian Alessa, 2022. "Socio-Ecological Futures: Embedded Solutions for Stakeholder-Driven Alternative Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Angela Huang & Fi-John Chang, 2021. "Prospects for Rooftop Farming System Dynamics: An Action to Stimulate Water-Energy-Food Nexus Synergies toward Green Cities of Tomorrow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Weston M. Eaton & Kathryn J. Brasier & Mark E. Burbach & Stephanie Kennedy & Jodi L. Delozier & Sara Esther Bonilla Anariba & Hannah T. Whitley & Walt Whitmer & Nicole Santangelo, 2023. "A new approach for studying social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement in water resource management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 389-403, September.
    5. Khara Grieger & Sebastian Zarate & Sarah Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling & Shelly Hunt & Daniela Jones & Jennifer Kuzma, 2022. "Fostering Responsible Innovation through Stakeholder Engagement: Case Study of North Carolina Sweetpotato Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Garrett M. Broad, 2023. "Improving the agri-food biotechnology conversation: bridging science communication with science and technology studies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 929-938, September.
    7. Gerlak, Andrea K. & Guido, Zack & Owen, Gigi & McGoffin, Mariana Sofia Rodriguez & Louder, Elena & Davies, Julia & Smith, Kelly Jay & Zimmer, Andy & Murveit, Anna M. & Meadow, Alison & Shrestha, Padme, 2023. "Stakeholder engagement in the co-production of knowledge for environmental decision-making," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weston M. Eaton & Kathryn J. Brasier & Mark E. Burbach & Stephanie Kennedy & Jodi L. Delozier & Sara Esther Bonilla Anariba & Hannah T. Whitley & Walt Whitmer & Nicole Santangelo, 2023. "A new approach for studying social, behavioral, and environmental change through stakeholder engagement in water resource management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 389-403, September.
    2. Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Lin Liu & Dee Jordan, 2021. "Water–food–energy–climate nexus and technology productivity: a Nigerian case study of organic leafy vegetable production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6128-6147, April.
    3. J. Leah Jones & Dave D. White, 2021. "A social network analysis of collaborative governance for the food-energy-water nexus in Phoenix, AZ, USA," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 671-681, December.
    4. Caiado Couto, Lilia & Campos, Luiza C. & da Fonseca-Zang, Warde & Zang, Joachim & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2021. "Water, waste, energy and food nexus in Brazil: Identifying a resource interlinkage research agenda through a systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Adenike K. Opejin & Rimjhim M. Aggarwal & Dave D. White & J. Leah Jones & Ross Maciejewski & Giuseppe Mascaro & Hessam S. Sarjoughian, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Food-Energy-Water Nexus Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Diana Rohlman & Jamie Donatuto & Myk Heidt & Michael Barton & Larry Campbell & Kim A. Anderson & Molly L. Kile, 2019. "A Case Study Describing a Community-Engaged Approach for Evaluating Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure in a Native American Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy & Breuer, Anita & Scheumann, Waltina, 2021. "Mechanisms for governing the water-land-food nexus in the lower Awash River Basin, Ethiopia: Ensuring policy coherence in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 26/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Chuenchum, Pavisorn & Meneesrikum, Chitchanuwat & Teerapanuchaikul, Chaiyraweepat & Sriariyawat, Anurak, 2024. "Community participation and effective water management: A study on water user organizations (WUOs) in Thailand," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    9. Min Ge & Kaili Yu & Ange Ding & Gaofeng Liu, 2022. "Input-Output Efficiency of Water-Energy-Food and Its Driving Forces: Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Zuo, Qiting & Wu, Qingsong & Yu, Lei & Li, Yongping & Fan, Yurui, 2021. "Optimization of uncertain agricultural management considering the framework of water, energy and food," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    11. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M.Ángeles & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2020. "Does investor attention influence water companies’ stock returns?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Kai Zhang & Haishu Lu & Bin Wang, 2024. "Benefit Distribution Mechanism of a Cooperative Alliance for Basin Water Resources from the Perspective of Cooperative Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-33, August.
    13. Martinez-Hernandez, Elias & Leach, Matthew & Yang, Aidong, 2017. "Understanding water-energy-food and ecosystem interactions using the nexus simulation tool NexSym," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1009-1021.
    14. Alireza Taghdisian & Sandra G. F. Bukkens & Mario Giampietro, 2022. "A Societal Metabolism Approach to Effectively Analyze the Water–Energy–Food Nexus in an Agricultural Transboundary River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Seul-gi Lee & Bashir Adelodun & Mirza Junaid Ahmad & Kyung Sook Choi, 2022. "Multi-Level Prioritization Analysis of Water Governance Components to Improve Agricultural Water-Saving Policy: A Case Study from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Taylor, M. & Pettit, J. & Sekiyama, T. & Sokołowski, M.M., 2023. "Justice-driven agrivoltaics: Facilitating agrivoltaics embedded in energy justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Märker, Carolin & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "Integrated governance for the food–energy–water nexus – The scope of action for institutional change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 290-300.
    18. Irene Monasterolo & Roberto Pasqualino & Anthony C. Janetos & Aled Jones, 2016. "Sustainable and Inclusive Food Systems through the Lenses of a Complex System Thinking Approach—A Bibliometric Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Kimberly Pugel & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann & Shawn Peabody & Karl Linden, 2020. "Adapting Collaborative Approaches for Service Provision to Low-Income Countries: Expert Panel Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Veruska Muccione & Thomas Lontzek & Christian Huggel & Philipp Ott & Nadine Salzmann, 2023. "An application of dynamic programming to local adaptation decision-making," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 523-544, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2160-:d:500987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.