IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2072-d499686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Goytia

    (Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

Abstract

The EU Floods Directive calls for integrated flood risk management at a catchment scale. The potential of this directive to integrate relevant policy areas and deliver catchment-based measures may however be undermined by sectoral laws and policies in the Member States. This article focuses on the legal issues affecting the integration of catchment-based measures for managing flood risk in three relevant policy areas, namely, energy (in the form of hydropower production), agriculture, and forestry, in Sweden. The results show that that the present legal frameworks not only can restrict attempts to introduce catchment-based measures through compulsory means, but in some cases can also encumber collaborative and voluntary initiatives. It is therefore important to reinforce the catchment perspective in the processes leading to the adoption of flood risk management plans, in terms of assessing flood risks, evaluating measures and engaging stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Goytia, 2021. "Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2072-:d:499686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hartmann, Thomas & Spit, Tejo, 2016. "Legitimizing differentiated flood protection levels – Consequences of the European flood risk management plan," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 361-367.
    2. Albrecht, Juliane, 2016. "Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the Floods Directive and Water Framework Directive: European requirements and German transposition," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 368-375.
    3. Jeremy G. Carter & John Handley & Tom Butlin & Susannah Gill, 2018. "Adapting cities to climate change – exploring the flood risk management role of green infrastructure landscapes," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(9), pages 1535-1552, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parfait K. Kouamé & Gilbert Fokou & Amoin Jeanne d’Arc Koffi & Amidou Sani & Bassirou Bonfoh & Kouassi Dongo, 2022. "Assessing Institutional Stakeholders’ Perception and Limitations on Coping Strategies in Flooding Risk Management in West Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Rauter & Thomas Thaler & Marie-Sophie Attems & Sven Fuchs, 2019. "Obligation or Innovation: Can the EU Floods Directive Be Seen as a Tipping Point Towards More Resilient Flood Risk Management? A Case Study from Vorarlberg, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Batory Agnes & Svensson Sara, 2019. "The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 28-39, December.
    3. Stefano Moroni & Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "Forms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 220-234, February.
    4. Vincent Caby & Lise Frehen, 2021. "How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.
    5. Byungsun Yang & Dongkun Lee, 2021. "Urban Green Space Arrangement for an Optimal Landscape Planning Strategy for Runoff Reduction," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Seung Kyum Kim & Paul Joosse & Mia M. Bennett & Terry Gevelt, 2020. "Impacts of green infrastructure on flood risk perceptions in Hong Kong," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2277-2299, October.
    7. Emmanuel Mavhura & Edson Munsaka & Gloria Round & Nomathemba Ngwenya & Paul Mabanga & Zacharia Jusa, 2024. "Disaster policy framework analysis: Experts' perspectives on the usefulness of the disaster legislation in Zimbabwe," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 852-866, March.
    8. Charalampos Skoulikaris & Yannis Krestenitis, 2020. "Cloud Data Scraping for the Assessment of Outflows from Dammed Rivers in the EU. A Case Study in South Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Érika Monteiro & Francisco Estrada & Giulia Pesaro & Scira Menoni, 2017. "Economic Assessment of Mitigating Damage of Flood Events: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Proofing Commercial Buildings in Umbria, Italy," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(4), pages 585-608, October.
    10. Rauter, Magdalena & Kaufmann, Maria & Thaler, Thomas & Fuchs, Sven, 2020. "Flood risk management in Austria: Analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Guy Ziv & Karen Mullin & Blandine Boeuf & William Fincham & Nigel Taylor & Giovanna Villalobos-Jiménez & Laura von Vittorelli & Christine Wolf & Oliver Fritsch & Michael Strauch & Ralf Seppelt & Marti, 2016. "Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Laura Moretti & Giuseppe Loprencipe, 2018. "Climate Change and Transport Infrastructures: State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Branham, Jordan & Onda, Kyle & Kaza, Nikhil & BenDor, Todd K. & Salvesen, David, 2021. "How does the removal of federal subsidies affect investment in coastal protection infrastructure?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Irena Niedźwiecka-Filipiak & Justyna Rubaszek & Anna Podolska & Jowita Pyszczek, 2020. "Sectoral Analysis of Landscape Interiors (SALI) as One of the Tools for Monitoring Changes in Green Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Anna Porębska & Izabela Godyń & Krzysztof Radzicki & Elżbieta Nachlik & Paola Rizzi, 2019. "Built Heritage, Sustainable Development, and Natural Hazards: Flood Protection and UNESCO World Heritage Site Protection Strategies in Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Mikša, Katažyna & Kalinauskas, Marius & Inácio, Miguel & Pereira, Paulo, 2021. "Implementation of the European Union Floods Directive—Requirements and national transposition and practical application: Lithuanian case-study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Carlos Eduardo Aguiar Souza Costa & Claudio José Cavalcante Blanco & José Francisco Oliveira-Júnior, 2021. "Impact of climate change in the flow regimes of the Upper and Middle Amazon River," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Hudson, Paul & Raška, Pavel & Macháč, Jan & Slavíková, Lenka, 2022. "Balancing the interaction between urban regeneration and flood risk management – A cost benefit approach in Ústí nad Labem," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Zorica Srdjevic & Naoyuki Funamizu & Bojan Srdjevic & Ratko Bajčetić, 2018. "Public Participation in Water Management of Krivaja River, Serbia: Understanding the Problem through Grounded Theory Methodology," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 5081-5092, December.
    20. Gabrielle Linscott & Andrea Rishworth & Brian King & Mikael P. Hiestand, 2022. "Uneven experiences of urban flooding: examining the 2010 Nashville flood," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(1), pages 629-653, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2072-:d:499686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.