IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v55y2016ip2p368-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the Floods Directive and Water Framework Directive: European requirements and German transposition

Author

Listed:
  • Albrecht, Juliane

Abstract

The paper investigates the legal framework for coordinating public participation in flood risk management and river basin management. It analyses the requirements of the Water Framework Directive, the Floods Directive, and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive from a comparative perspective and elaborates criteria for effective coordination of consultation procedures. The assessment of European requirements against these criteria reveals leeway for specification in national legal transposition. The extent to which Germany has made use of this leeway for coordination of consultation and participation is examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Albrecht, Juliane, 2016. "Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the Floods Directive and Water Framework Directive: European requirements and German transposition," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 368-375.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p2:p:368-375
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115300447
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Batory Agnes & Svensson Sara, 2019. "The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 28-39, December.
    2. Charalampos Skoulikaris & Yannis Krestenitis, 2020. "Cloud Data Scraping for the Assessment of Outflows from Dammed Rivers in the EU. A Case Study in South Eastern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Susana Goytia, 2021. "Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Magdalena Rauter & Thomas Thaler & Marie-Sophie Attems & Sven Fuchs, 2019. "Obligation or Innovation: Can the EU Floods Directive Be Seen as a Tipping Point Towards More Resilient Flood Risk Management? A Case Study from Vorarlberg, Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Guy Ziv & Karen Mullin & Blandine Boeuf & William Fincham & Nigel Taylor & Giovanna Villalobos-Jiménez & Laura von Vittorelli & Christine Wolf & Oliver Fritsch & Michael Strauch & Ralf Seppelt & Marti, 2016. "Water Quality Is a Poor Predictor of Recreational Hotspots in England," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Zorica Srdjevic & Naoyuki Funamizu & Bojan Srdjevic & Ratko Bajčetić, 2018. "Public Participation in Water Management of Krivaja River, Serbia: Understanding the Problem through Grounded Theory Methodology," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 5081-5092, December.
    7. Emmanuel Mavhura & Edson Munsaka & Gloria Round & Nomathemba Ngwenya & Paul Mabanga & Zacharia Jusa, 2024. "Disaster policy framework analysis: Experts' perspectives on the usefulness of the disaster legislation in Zimbabwe," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 852-866, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p2:p:368-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.