IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p966-d482777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Broken but Well: Healing Dimensions of Cultural Tourism Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Angelina Jelinčić

    (Institute for Development and International Relations 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ingeborg Matečić

    (Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Wellbeing has been researched in relation to social, wellness, rural, backpacker, senior, wildlife, transformational or transformative tourism or studies exist specifically focusing on wellbeing tourism. Surprisingly enough, there is a void of research focus on wellbeing in cultural tourism, although culture has been considered as having a substantial impact on wellbeing. The research uses the case study of the Museum of Broken Relationships (MBR) in Zagreb, Croatia, under the assumption that MBR experiences have a relevant influence on tourists’ subjective wellbeing. Subjective wellbeing was measured after the visitation using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) and a majority of the respondents experienced moderate to high wellbeing. Furthermore, the research aimed to investigate whether or not there is any difference between cultural and non-cultural tourists’ subjective wellbeing noted after the visitation to the Museum. The results showed that there was no substantial difference between cultural and non-cultural tourists’ subjective wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Angelina Jelinčić & Ingeborg Matečić, 2021. "Broken but Well: Healing Dimensions of Cultural Tourism Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:966-:d:482777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/966/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/966/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Hand, 2018. "Do the arts make you happy? A quantile regression approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 271-286, May.
    2. Paolo Corvo, 2011. "The Pursuit of Happiness and the Globalized Tourist," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 93-97, May.
    3. Jeroen Nawijn, 2011. "Happiness Through Vacationing: Just a Temporary Boost or Long-Term Benefits?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 651-665, August.
    4. Ingeborg Matečić & Dimitri Ioannides, 2019. "Experience Co-Creation in the Touristscape: The Path toward a Systematic Theoretical Construct," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Daniela Angelina Jelinčić & Yoel Mansfeld (ed.), Creating and Managing Experiences in Cultural Tourism, chapter 3, pages 43-55, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Olli Nummela & Tommi Sulander & Ossi Rahkonen & Antti Uutela, 2008. "Associations of self-rated health with different forms of leisure activities among ageing people," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 53(5), pages 227-235, October.
    6. Daisy Fancourt & Claire Garnett & Neta Spiro & Robert West & Daniel Müllensiefen, 2019. "How do artistic creative activities regulate our emotions? Validation of the Emotion Regulation Strategies for Artistic Creative Activities Scale (ERS-ACA)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Ateca-Amestoy, Victoria & Serrano-del-Rosal, Rafael & Vera-Toscano, Esperanza, 2008. "The leisure experience," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 64-78, February.
    8. Suntikul, Wantanee & Jachna, Timothy, 2016. "The co-creation/place attachment nexus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 276-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertacchini, Enrico & Venturini, Alessandra & Misuraca, Roberta & Zotti, Roberto, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between subjective well-being and diversity and intensity in cultural consumption," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202219, University of Turin.
    2. Bertacchini, Enrico & Bolognesi, Valentina & Venturini, Alessandra & Zotti, Roberto, 2021. "The Happy Cultural Omnivore? Exploring the Relationship between Cultural Consumption Patterns and Subjective Well-Being," IZA Discussion Papers 14749, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Daniel Badulescu & Ramona Simut & Ciprian Simut & Andrei-Vlad Badulescu, 2022. "Tourism at the Crossroads between Well-Being, Public Health and the Environment: Panel Data Evidence from the European Union," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Seira Iida, 2019. "Structure of life satisfaction from the perspective of arts experiences in Japan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Kay Smith, Melanie & Diekmann, Anya, 2017. "Tourism and wellbeing," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-13.
    6. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    7. Jessica K. Bone & Feifei Bu & Jill K. Sonke & Daisy Fancourt, 2024. "Leisure engagement in older age is related to objective and subjective experiences of aging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Change Zhu & Christine Walsh & Lulin Zhou & Xinjie Zhang, 2023. "Latent Classification Analysis of Leisure Activities and Their Impact on ADL, IADL and Cognitive Ability of Older Adults Based on CLHLS (2008–2018)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Zins, Andreas H. & Ponocny, Ivo, 2022. "On the importance of leisure travel for psychosocial wellbeing," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Miroslav Rončák & Petr Scholz & Ivica Linderová, 2021. "Safety Concerns and Travel Behavior of Generation Z: Case Study from the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Oksana Tokarchuk & Roberto Gabriele & Oswin Maurer, 2016. "Tourism intensity impact on satisfaction with life of German residents," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(6), pages 1315-1331, December.
    12. Amina Ahmed Lahsen & Alan T. Piper, 2019. "Property rights and intellectual property protection, GDP growth and individual well-being in Latin America," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Cristina Bernini & Silvia Emili & Federica Galli, 2021. "Does urbanization matter in the expenditure‐happiness nexus?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(6), pages 1403-1428, December.
    14. Tae‐Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2020. "The relationship between overall happiness and perceived transportation services relative to other individual and environmental variables," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 712-733, June.
    15. Jen D Snowball & Geoff G Antrobus, 2021. "Festival value in multicultural contexts: City festivals in South Africa," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(6), pages 1256-1275, September.
    16. Antonello E. Scorcu & Laura Vici & Roberto Zanola, 2021. "To fake or not to fake: An empirical investigation on the fine art market," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(1), pages 143-152, March.
    17. Daniel Wheatley & Craig Bickerton, 2017. "Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 23-45, February.
    18. Federica Codignola & Paolo Mariani, 2022. "Investigating preferences in art collecting: the case of the François Pinault Collection," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 107-133, March.
    19. Lea Susanne Faerber & Dennis C. Ahrholdt & Oliver Schnittka & Zeinab Rezvani, 2021. "Visitor characteristics matter: how the positive impact of visit duration on visitor satisfaction at visitor attractions is moderated," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 333-351, April.
    20. Massomeh Cheraghzadeh & Mehdi Rahimian & Saeed Gholamrezai, 2024. "Effective factors on tourist satisfaction with the quality of ecotourism destination: evidence from Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28699-28726, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:966-:d:482777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.