IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12785-d682751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Key Organizational Factors in Healthcare Waste Management Practices of Libyan Public Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Khalifa Abdelsalam

    (Department of Banking and Risk Management, School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia UUM, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Ibrahim Mohammed Massoud Egdair

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic and Accounting-Murzq, Sebha University, Sebha 00218, Libya)

  • Halima Begum

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia UUM, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Diara Md. Jadi

    (Department of Banking and Risk Management, School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia UUM, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Hussein-Elhakim Al Issa

    (Business School, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, UK)

  • Omar Saad Saleh Abrika

    (Faculty of Pharmacy, Sebha University, Sebha 00218, Libya)

  • A. S. A. Ferdous Alam

    (School of International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia UUM, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate factors contributing to healthcare waste management practices among Libyan public hospitals. The organizational culture and structure are proposed to have their effect upon hospital organizational units in charge of healthcare waste production by a theoretical review to develop two main hypotheses. Hence, this study used the stratified random sampling technique to select respondents such as top management officials, heads of departments, and administrators who work in all the hospitals located in the south of Libya, from whom data was collected. The data for the study was gathered via a survey questionnaire from Libyan public hospitals in the country’s southern region. A total of 210 questionnaires were distributed and 171 usable responses were received, yielding a 70% response rate. Though the findings of the study show some inconsistency, the two dimensions of the culture examined in this study are found to have a positive relationship and significant influence on the management practices of health waste. Besides, it shows the positive relationship between organizational structure and healthcare waste management practices (HWMP). However, the findings of this study suggested that nurses and cleaners’ practices should critically consider structure dimensions such as formalization as well as moderating variables such as hospital location and type of services supplied on the interactions to improve the management of healthcare waste in Libya’s public hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Khalifa Abdelsalam & Ibrahim Mohammed Massoud Egdair & Halima Begum & Diara Md. Jadi & Hussein-Elhakim Al Issa & Omar Saad Saleh Abrika & A. S. A. Ferdous Alam, 2021. "The Key Organizational Factors in Healthcare Waste Management Practices of Libyan Public Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12785-:d:682751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald Fischer & Maria Cristina Ferreira & Nathalie Meurs & Kubilay Gok & Ding-Yu Jiang & Johnny R J Fontaine & Charles Harb & Jan Cieciuch & Mustapha Achoui & Ma Socorro D Mendoza & Arif Hassan & Don, 2019. "Does organizational formalization facilitate voice and helping organizational citizenship behaviors? It depends on (national) uncertainty norms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 125-134, February.
    2. Bénédicte Reynaud, 2005. "The void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule-following," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590855, HAL.
    3. Yen, Chang-Hua & Teng, Hsiu-Yu, 2013. "The effect of centralization on organizational citizenship behavior and deviant workplace behavior in the hospitality industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 401-410.
    4. Katsikea, Evangelia & Theodosiou, Marios & Perdikis, Nick & Kehagias, John, 2011. "The effects of organizational structure and job characteristics on export sales managers' job satisfaction and organizational commitment," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 221-233, April.
    5. Patrick Cohendet & Frédéric Creplet & Morad Diani & Olivier Dupouët & Eric Schenk, 2004. "Matching Communities and Hierarchies within the Firm," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 27-48, March.
    6. Schminke, Marshall & Cropanzano, Russell & Rupp, Deborah E., 2002. "Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 881-905, September.
    7. Martha S. Feldman & Brian T. Pentland & Luciana D’Adderio & Nathalie Lazaric, 2016. "Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 505-513, June.
    8. Zheng, Wei & Yang, Baiyin & McLean, Gary N., 2010. "Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(7), pages 763-771, July.
    9. Bénédicte Reynaud, 2005. "The void at the heart of rules: routines in the context of rule-following. The case of the Paris Metro Workshop," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 14(5), pages 847-871, October.
    10. Anabela Botelho, 2013. "The impact of regulatory compliance behavior on hazardous waste generation in European private healthcare facilities," NIMA Working Papers 49, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    11. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    12. Martina Nieswandt, 2015. "Changing Organisational Culture: A Review of the Literature," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Fast Cultural Change, chapter 2, pages 5-60, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & Claver-Cortés, Enrique, 2010. "Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 310-320, March.
    14. Martina Nieswandt, 2015. "Fast Cultural Change," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-51550-6, October.
    15. Chung-An Chen & Hal G. Rainey, 2014. "Personnel Formalization and the Enhancement Of Teamwork: A public-private comparison," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(7), pages 945-968, October.
    16. James E. Skivington & Richard L. Daft, 1991. "A Study Of Organizational ‘Framework’ And ‘Process’ Modalities For The Implementation Of Business‐Level Strategic Decisions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 45-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abrar Mahjoob & Yousef Alfadhli & Vincent Omachonu, 2023. "Healthcare Waste and Sustainability: Implications for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Glory Okojie & Ida Rosnita Ismail & Halima Begum & A. S. A. Ferdous Alam & Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada, 2023. "The Mediating Role of Social Support on the Relationship between Employee Resilience and Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Mateja Lorber & Mojca Dobnik, 2022. "The Importance of Monitoring the Psychological Wellbeing and Mental Health of Nursing Staff for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada & Andrea Gatto, 2023. "Grow First, Clean Up Later ? Dropping Old Paradigms and Opening Up New Horizons of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-6, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghulam Mustafa & Richard Glavee-Geo & Kjell Gronhaug & Hanan Saber Almazrouei, 2019. "Structural Impacts on Formation of Self-Efficacy and Its Performance Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Molina-Azorín, José F., 2012. "Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 993-1002.
    3. Anja Danner-Schröder, 2021. "Without actors, there is no action: How interpersonal interactions help to explain routine dynamics," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1913-1936, October.
    4. Malakkaran Johny Jino & Hima Elizabeth Mathew, 2021. "Can Formalisation Ensure Ethical Behaviour Among Teachers? The Mediating Role of Moral Efficacy," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 306-323, May.
    5. Yen, Chang-Hua & Teng, Hsiu-Yu, 2013. "The effect of centralization on organizational citizenship behavior and deviant workplace behavior in the hospitality industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 401-410.
    6. Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & Claver-Cortés, Enrique, 2010. "Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 310-320, March.
    7. Dehua Gao & Aliakbar Akbaritabar, 2022. "Using agent-based modeling in routine dynamics research: a quantitative and content analysis of literature," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 521-550, February.
    8. Eva, Nathan & Sendjaya, Sen & Prajogo, Daniel & Madison, Karryna, 2021. "Does organizational structure render leadership unnecessary? Configurations of formalization and centralization as a substitute and neutralizer of servant leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 43-56.
    9. Nathalie Lazaric, 2007. "Are Routines Reducible or Mere Cognitive Automatisms? Some contributions from cognitive science to help shed light on change in routines," DRUID Working Papers 07-13, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Ghulam Mustafa & Hans Solli-Sæther & Virginia Bodolica & Jon Ivar Håvold & Anam Ilyas, 2022. "Digitalization trends and organizational structure: bureaucracy, ambidexterity or post-bureaucracy?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 671-694, December.
    11. Stephanie Bertels & Jennifer Howard-Grenville & Simon Pek, 2016. "Cultural Molding, Shielding, and Shoring at Oilco: The Role of Culture in the Integration of Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 573-593, June.
    12. Marie CORIS (GREThA-GRES), 2008. "The coordination issues of relocations: How proximity still matters in location of software development activities\r\n," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2008-03, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    13. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "What's Happening to Our Universities?," Working Papers wp477, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    14. Philip Stiles & Jonathan Trevor & Elaine Farndale & Shad S. Morris & Jaap Paauwe & Guenter Stahl & Patrick Wright, 2015. "Changing Routine: Reframing Performance Management within a Multinational," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 63-88, January.
    15. Ali, Murad & Park, Kichan, 2016. "The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1669-1675.
    16. Rouslan Koumakhov & Adel Daoud, 2017. "Routine and reflexivity: Simonian cognitivism vs practice approach," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 727-743.
    17. Waldemar Kremser & Georg Schreyögg, 2016. "The Dynamics of Interrelated Routines: Introducing the Cluster Level," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 698-721, June.
    18. Neil M Kay, 2018. "We need to talk: opposing narratives and conflicting perspectives in the conversation on routines," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 943-956.
    19. Julie Bertz & Martin Quinn, 2014. "Interpreting management accounting rules: an initial study of public bodies," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 319-342, February.
    20. Rodney Coyte & David Emsley & David Boyd, 2010. "Examining Management Accounting Change as Rules and Routines: The Effect of Rule Precision," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 96-109, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12785-:d:682751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.