IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9712-d625059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning-Based Classification and Regression Approach for Sustainable Disaster Management: The Case Study of APR1400 in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Abd El-Hameed

    (Department of NPP Engineering, KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School, 658-91 Haemaji-ro, Seosaeng-myeon, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 45014, Korea)

  • Juyoul Kim

    (Department of NPP Engineering, KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School, 658-91 Haemaji-ro, Seosaeng-myeon, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 45014, Korea)

Abstract

During nuclear accidents, decision-makers need to handle considerable data to take appropriate protective actions to protect people and the environment from radioactive material release. In such scenarios, machine learning can be an essential tool in facilitating the protection action decisions that will be made by decision-makers. By feeding machines software with big data to analyze and identify nuclear accident behavior, types, and the concentrations of released radioactive materials can be predicted, thus helping in early warning and protecting people and the environment. In this study, based on the ground deposition concentration of radioactive materials at different distances offsite in an emergency planning zone (EPZ), we proposed classification and regression models for three severe accidents. The objective of the classification model is to recognize the transient situation type for taking appropriate actions, while the objective of the regression model is to estimate the concentrations of the released radioactive materials. We used the Personal Computer Transient Analyser (PCTRAN) Advanced Power Reactor (APR) 1400 to simulate three severe accident scenarios and to generate a source term released to the environment. Additionally, the Radiological Consequence Analysis Program (RCAP) was used to assess the off-site consequences of nuclear power plant accidents and to estimate the ground deposition concentrations of radionuclides. Moreover, ground deposition concentrations at different distances were used as input data for the classification and regression tree (CART) models to obtain an accident pattern and to establish a prediction model. Results showed that the ground deposition concentration at a near distance from a nuclear power plant is a more informative parameter in predicting the concentration of radioactive material release, while the ground deposition concentration at a far distance is a very informative parameter in identifying accident types. In the regression model, the R-square of the training and test data was 0.995 and 0.994, respectively, showing a mean strong linear relationship between the predicted and actual concentration of radioactive material release. The mean absolute percentage error was found to be 26.9% and 28.1% for the training and test data, respectively. In the classification model, the model predicted a scenario (1) of 99.8% and 98.9%, scenario (2) of 98.4% and 91.6%, and scenario (3) of 98.6% and 94.7% for the training and test data, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Abd El-Hameed & Juyoul Kim, 2021. "Machine Learning-Based Classification and Regression Approach for Sustainable Disaster Management: The Case Study of APR1400 in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9712-:d:625059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Hossain Khan & Md Shafiqul Islam, 2019. "A Pctran-Based Investigation On The Effect Of Inadvertent Control Rod Withdrawal On The ThermalHydraulic Parameters Of A Vver-1200 Nuclear Power Reactor," Acta Mechanica Malaysia (AMM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 32-38, October.
    2. Roth, Michael Buchdahl & Jaramillo, Paulina, 2017. "Going nuclear for climate mitigation: An analysis of the cost effectiveness of preserving existing U.S. nuclear power plants as a carbon avoidance strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 67-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohannad Khameis Almteiri & Juyoul Kim, 2022. "Applications of Machine Learning to Consequence Analysis of Hypothetical Accidents at Barakah Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Brielle Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Emergency and Disaster Management, Preparedness, and Planning (EDMPP) and the ‘Social’: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-50, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. SarahM. Jordaan & Afreen Siddiqi & William Kakenmaster & AliceC. Hill, 2019. "The Climate Vulnerabilities of Global Nuclear Power," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 3-13, November.
    2. David Popp & Jacquelyn Pless & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone, 2020. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 175-248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Marisol Garrouste & Michael T. Craig & Daniel Wendt & Maria Herrera Diaz & William Jenson & Qian Zhang & Brendan Kochunas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Synthetic Fuel Production from Existing Nuclear Power Plants across the United States," Papers 2309.12085, arXiv.org.
    4. Schmeda-Lopez, Diego & McConnaughy, Thomas B. & McFarland, Eric W., 2018. "Radiation enhanced chemical production: Improving the value proposition of nuclear power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 491-504.
    5. Craig, Michael T. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Williams, Nathaniel J. & Severnini, Edson, 2018. "A retrospective analysis of the market price response to distributed photovoltaic generation in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 394-403.
    6. Eser, P. & Chokani, N. & Abhari, R., 2018. "Trade-offs between integration and isolation in Switzerland's energy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 19-27.
    7. Sandro Sacchelli & Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Dariusz Suszanowicz, 2022. "Ground-Mounted Photovoltaic and Crop Cultivation: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Salauddin Omar & Mohammad Nasim Hasan, 2022. "A Pctran Based Analysis On The Effect Of Breaksize And Comparative Study Between Hot And Cold Leg Loss Of Coolant Accidents In Vver 1200 Power Reactor," Acta Mechanica Malaysia (AMM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 31-34, July.
    9. Bernstein, David H. & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Tsionas, Mike G., 2023. "On the performance of the United States nuclear power sector: A Bayesian approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Yuan, Mengyao & Tong, Fan & Duan, Lei & Dowling, Jacqueline A. & Davis, Steven J. & Lewis, Nathan S. & Caldeira, Ken, 2020. "Would firm generators facilitate or deter variable renewable energy in a carbon-free electricity system?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Wakiyama, Takako & Kuriyama, Akihisa, 2018. "Assessment of renewable energy expansion potential and its implications on reforming Japan's electricity system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 302-316.
    12. Bessette, Douglas L. & Arvai, Joseph L., 2018. "Engaging attribute tradeoffs in clean energy portfolio development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 221-229.
    13. Huang, Anzhong & Guo, Meiwen & Dai, Luote & Mirza, Aboubakar & Ali, Sajid, 2024. "Budgeting for a greener future: Asymmetric nexus between nuclear energy technology budgets and CO2 emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2020. "Value of technology in the U.S. electric power sector: Impacts of full portfolios and technological change on the costs of meeting decarbonization goals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Murphy, Sinnott & Lavin, Luke & Apt, Jay, 2020. "Resource adequacy implications of temperature-dependent electric generator availability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    16. Seda Canbulat & Kutlu Balci & Onder Canbulat & I. Safak Bayram, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of On-Site Energy Storage Units to Mitigate Wind Energy Curtailment: A Case Study in Scotland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Muellner, Nikolaus & Arnold, Nikolaus & Gufler, Klaus & Kromp, Wolfgang & Renneberg, Wolfgang & Liebert, Wolfgang, 2021. "Nuclear energy - The solution to climate change?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Diana Silva Siqueira & Josué Meystre & Maicon Queiroz Hilário & Danilo Henrique Donato Rocha & Genésio José Menon & Rogério José Silva, 2019. "Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 749-777, June.
    19. Bah, Muhammad Maladoh, 2023. "State and federal nuclear support schemes in dynamic electricity market conditions: Insights from NYISO and PJM," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Abid Hossain Khan & Md Shafiqul Islam, 2019. "A Pctran-Based Investigation On The Effect Of Inadvertent Control Rod Withdrawal On The ThermalHydraulic Parameters Of A Vver-1200 Nuclear Power Reactor," Acta Mechanica Malaysia (AMM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 32-38, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9712-:d:625059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.