IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i6p1691-d519691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Analysis of On-Site Energy Storage Units to Mitigate Wind Energy Curtailment: A Case Study in Scotland

Author

Listed:
  • Seda Canbulat

    (Department of Economics, Business School, University of Strathclyde, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, UK)

  • Kutlu Balci

    (Mott MacDonald, Renewable Energy Department, St Vincent Plaza, Glasgow G2 5LD, UK)

  • Onder Canbulat

    (Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Marine Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose St, Glasgow G4 0LZ, UK)

  • I. Safak Bayram

    (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

Abstract

Wind energy plays a major role in decarbonisation of the electricity sector and supports achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. Over the last decade, the wind energy deployments have grown steadily, accounting for more than one fourth of the annual electricity generation in countries like the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Germany. However, as the share of wind energy increases, system operators face challenges in managing excessive wind generation due to its nondispatchable nature. Currently, the most common practice is wind energy curtailment in which wind farm operators receive constraint payments to reduce their renewable energy production. This practice not only leads to wastage of large volumes of renewable energy, but also the associated financial cost is reflected to rate payers in the form of increased electricity bills. On-site energy storage technologies come to the forefront as a technology option to minimise wind energy curtailment and to harness wind energy in a more efficient way. To that end, this paper, first, systematically evaluates different energy storage options for wind energy farms. Second, a depth analysis of curtailment and constraint payments of major wind energy farms in Scotland are presented. Third, using actual wind and market datasets, a techno-economic analysis is conducted to examine the relationship between on-site energy storage size and the amount of curtailment. The results show that, similar to recent deployments, lithium-ion technology is best suited for on-site storage. As case studies, Whitelee and Gordon bush wind farms in Scotland are chosen. The most suitable storage capacities for 20 years payback period is calculated as follows: (i) the storage size for the Gordonbush wind farm is 100 MWh and almost 19% of total curtailment can be avoided and (ii) the storage size for the Whitlee farm is 125 MWh which can reduce the curtailment by 20.2%. The outcomes of this study will shed light into analysing curtailment reduction potential of future wind farms including floating islands, seaports, and other floating systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Seda Canbulat & Kutlu Balci & Onder Canbulat & I. Safak Bayram, 2021. "Techno-Economic Analysis of On-Site Energy Storage Units to Mitigate Wind Energy Curtailment: A Case Study in Scotland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1691-:d:519691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wood, Geoffrey & Dow, Stephen, 2011. "What lessons have been learned in reforming the Renewables Obligation? An analysis of internal and external failures in UK renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2228-2244, May.
    2. Siddique, Muhammad Bilal & Thakur, Jagruti, 2020. "Assessment of curtailed wind energy potential for off-grid applications through mobile battery storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Williams, Eric & Hittinger, Eric & Carvalho, Rexon & Williams, Ryan, 2017. "Wind power costs expected to decrease due to technological progress," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-435.
    4. Zakeri, Behnam & Syri, Sanna, 2015. "Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 569-596.
    5. Roth, Michael Buchdahl & Jaramillo, Paulina, 2017. "Going nuclear for climate mitigation: An analysis of the cost effectiveness of preserving existing U.S. nuclear power plants as a carbon avoidance strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 67-77.
    6. Diouf, Boucar & Pode, Ramchandra, 2015. "Potential of lithium-ion batteries in renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 375-380.
    7. Woodman, B. & Mitchell, C., 2011. "Learning from experience? The development of the Renewables Obligation in England and Wales 2002-2010," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 3914-3921, July.
    8. Guney, Mukrimin Sevket & Tepe, Yalcin, 2017. "Classification and assessment of energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1187-1197.
    9. Kaldellis, J.K. & Zafirakis, D. & Kavadias, K., 2009. "Techno-economic comparison of energy storage systems for island autonomous electrical networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 378-392, February.
    10. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    11. Geth, F. & Brijs, T. & Kathan, J. & Driesen, J. & Belmans, R., 2015. "An overview of large-scale stationary electricity storage plants in Europe: Current status and new developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1212-1227.
    12. Díaz-González, Francisco & Sumper, Andreas & Gomis-Bellmunt, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto, 2012. "A review of energy storage technologies for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2154-2171.
    13. Schimpe, Michael & Naumann, Maik & Truong, Nam & Hesse, Holger C. & Santhanagopalan, Shriram & Saxon, Aron & Jossen, Andreas, 2018. "Energy efficiency evaluation of a stationary lithium-ion battery container storage system via electro-thermal modeling and detailed component analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 211-229.
    14. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2014. "The role of large-scale energy storage design and dispatch in the power grid: A study of very high grid penetration of variable renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 75-89.
    15. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    16. Welisch, Marijke & Poudineh, Rahmatallah, 2020. "Auctions for allocation of offshore wind contracts for difference in the UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1266-1274.
    17. Caralis, George & Christakopoulos, Theofanis & Karellas, Sotirios & Gao, Zhiqiu, 2019. "Analysis of energy storage systems to exploit wind energy curtailment in Crete," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 122-139.
    18. Joos, Michael & Staffell, Iain, 2018. "Short-term integration costs of variable renewable energy: Wind curtailment and balancing in Britain and Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 45-65.
    19. Bird, Lori & Lew, Debra & Milligan, Michael & Carlini, E. Maria & Estanqueiro, Ana & Flynn, Damian & Gomez-Lazaro, Emilio & Holttinen, Hannele & Menemenlis, Nickie & Orths, Antje & Eriksen, Peter Børr, 2016. "Wind and solar energy curtailment: A review of international experience," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 577-586.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Jung & Dirk Schindler, 2023. "Reasons for the Recent Onshore Wind Capacity Factor Increase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Hubert Bialas & Ryszard Pawelek & Irena Wasiak, 2021. "A Simulation Model for Providing Analysis of Wind Farms Frequency and Voltage Regulation Services in an Electrical Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Mohamed Zaidan Qawaqzeh & Oleksandr Miroshnyk & Taras Shchur & Robert Kasner & Adam Idzikowski & Weronika Kruszelnicka & Andrzej Tomporowski & Patrycja Bałdowska-Witos & Józef Flizikowski & Marcin Zaw, 2021. "Research of Emergency Modes of Wind Power Plants Using Computer Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Usama Awan & Khalid Zaman & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, 2021. "Assessing Hybrid Solar-Wind Potential for Industrial Decarbonization Strategies: Global Shift to Green Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Georgios E. Arnaoutakis & Georgia Kefala & Eirini Dakanali & Dimitris Al. Katsaprakakis, 2022. "Combined Operation of Wind-Pumped Hydro Storage Plant with a Concentrating Solar Power Plant for Insular Systems: A Case Study for the Island of Rhodes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Argyrou, Maria C. & Christodoulides, Paul & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2018. "Energy storage for electricity generation and related processes: Technologies appraisal and grid scale applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 804-821.
    2. Caralis, George & Christakopoulos, Theofanis & Karellas, Sotirios & Gao, Zhiqiu, 2019. "Analysis of energy storage systems to exploit wind energy curtailment in Crete," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 122-139.
    3. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    4. Morteza Zare Oskouei & Ayşe Aybike Şeker & Süleyman Tunçel & Emin Demirbaş & Tuba Gözel & Mehmet Hakan Hocaoğlu & Mehdi Abapour & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo, 2022. "A Critical Review on the Impacts of Energy Storage Systems and Demand-Side Management Strategies in the Economic Operation of Renewable-Based Distribution Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, February.
    5. Daniel Akinyele & Juri Belikov & Yoash Levron, 2017. "Battery Storage Technologies for Electrical Applications: Impact in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    6. Yang, Yuqing & Bremner, Stephen & Menictas, Chris & Kay, Merlinde, 2022. "Modelling and optimal energy management for battery energy storage systems in renewable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    8. Diana Enescu & Gianfranco Chicco & Radu Porumb & George Seritan, 2020. "Thermal Energy Storage for Grid Applications: Current Status and Emerging Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Masebinu, S.O. & Akinlabi, E.T. & Muzenda, E. & Aboyade, A.O., 2017. "Techno-economics and environmental analysis of energy storage for a student residence under a South African time-of-use tariff rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 413-429.
    10. Rao, A. Gangoli & van den Oudenalder, F.S.C. & Klein, S.A., 2019. "Natural gas displacement by wind curtailment utilization in combined-cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 477-491.
    11. He, Wei & Wang, Jihong, 2017. "Feasibility study of energy storage by concentrating/desalinating water: Concentrated Water Energy Storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 872-884.
    12. de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Jenkins, Jesse D. & Botterud, Audun, 2016. "The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 368-379.
    13. Li, Sheying & Cai, Yang-Hui & Schäfer, Andrea I. & Richards, Bryce S., 2019. "Renewable energy powered membrane technology: A review of the reliability of photovoltaic-powered membrane system components for brackish water desalination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Zhang, Ziyu & Ding, Tao & Zhou, Quan & Sun, Yuge & Qu, Ming & Zeng, Ziyu & Ju, Yuntao & Li, Li & Wang, Kang & Chi, Fangde, 2021. "A review of technologies and applications on versatile energy storage systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Papadopoulos, Agis M., 2020. "Renewable energies and storage in small insular systems: Potential, perspectives and a case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 103-114.
    16. Frate, G.F. & Cherubini, P. & Tacconelli, C. & Micangeli, A. & Ferrari, L. & Desideri, U., 2019. "Ramp rate abatement for wind power plants: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    17. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    18. Apostolou, Dimitrios & Enevoldsen, Peter, 2019. "The past, present and potential of hydrogen as a multifunctional storage application for wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 917-929.
    19. Park, Jinwoo & You, Fengqi & Cho, Hyungtae & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2020. "Novel massive thermal energy storage system for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Li, Qi & Xiao, Xukang & Pu, Yuchen & Luo, Shuyu & Liu, Hong & Chen, Weirong, 2023. "Hierarchical optimal scheduling method for regional integrated energy systems considering electricity-hydrogen shared energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1691-:d:519691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.