IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2309.12085.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Techno-Economic Analysis of Synthetic Fuel Production from Existing Nuclear Power Plants across the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Marisol Garrouste
  • Michael T. Craig
  • Daniel Wendt
  • Maria Herrera Diaz
  • William Jenson
  • Qian Zhang
  • Brendan Kochunas

Abstract

Low carbon synfuel can displace transport fossil fuels such as diesel and jet fuel and help achieve the decarbonization of the transportation sector at a global scale, but large-scale cost-effective production facilities are needed. Meanwhile, nuclear power plants are closing due to economic difficulties: electricity prices are too low and variable to cover their operational costs. Using existing nuclear power plants to produce synfuels might prevent loss of these low-carbon assets while producing synfuels at scale, but no technoeconomic analysis of this Integrated Energy System exist. We quantify the technoeconomic potential of coupling a synthetic fuel production process with five example nuclear power plants across the U.S. to explore the influence of different electricity markets, access to carbon dioxide sources, and fuel markets. Coupling synfuel production increases nuclear plant profitability by up to 792 million USD(2020) in addition to a 10 percent rate of return on investment over a 20 year period. Our analysis identifies drivers for the economic profitability of the synfuel IES. The hydrogen production tax credit from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act is essential to its overall profitability representing on average three quarters of its revenues. The carbon feedstock transportation is the highest cost - more than a third on average - closely followed by the synfuel production process capital costs. Those results show the key role of incentive policies for the decarbonization of the transportation sector and the economic importance of the geographic location of Integrated Energy Systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marisol Garrouste & Michael T. Craig & Daniel Wendt & Maria Herrera Diaz & William Jenson & Qian Zhang & Brendan Kochunas, 2023. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Synthetic Fuel Production from Existing Nuclear Power Plants across the United States," Papers 2309.12085, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2309.12085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.12085
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roth, Michael Buchdahl & Jaramillo, Paulina, 2017. "Going nuclear for climate mitigation: An analysis of the cost effectiveness of preserving existing U.S. nuclear power plants as a carbon avoidance strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 67-77.
    2. Juan C. González Palencia & Van Tuan Nguyen & Mikiya Araki & Seiichi Shiga, 2020. "The Role of Powertrain Electrification in Achieving Deep Decarbonization in Road Freight Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Chen, Jun & Rabiti, Cristian, 2017. "Synthetic wind speed scenarios generation for probabilistic analysis of hybrid energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 507-517.
    4. Sophia Appl-Scorza & Jana Lippelt & Christina Littlejohn, 2018. "Challenges of Electrification of Heavy and Long-haul Traffic," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(04), pages 46-59, December.
    5. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. SarahM. Jordaan & Afreen Siddiqi & William Kakenmaster & AliceC. Hill, 2019. "The Climate Vulnerabilities of Global Nuclear Power," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 3-13, November.
    3. David Popp & Jacquelyn Pless & Ivan Haščič & Nick Johnstone, 2020. "Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Energy Sector," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 175-248, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Caputo, Antonio C. & Federici, Alessandro & Pelagagge, Pacifico M. & Salini, Paolo, 2023. "Offshore wind power system economic evaluation framework under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    5. Mehdi Jahangir Samet & Heikki Liimatainen & Oscar Patrick René van Vliet & Markus Pöllänen, 2021. "Road Freight Transport Electrification Potential by Using Battery Electric Trucks in Finland and Switzerland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Schmeda-Lopez, Diego & McConnaughy, Thomas B. & McFarland, Eric W., 2018. "Radiation enhanced chemical production: Improving the value proposition of nuclear power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 491-504.
    7. Craig, Michael T. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Williams, Nathaniel J. & Severnini, Edson, 2018. "A retrospective analysis of the market price response to distributed photovoltaic generation in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 394-403.
    8. Jacek Pielecha & Kinga Skobiej & Przemyslaw Kubiak & Marek Wozniak & Krzysztof Siczek, 2022. "Exhaust Emissions from Plug-in and HEV Vehicles in Type-Approval Tests and Real Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, March.
    9. Yuan, Ran & Wang, Bo & Mao, Zhixin & Watada, Junzo, 2021. "Multi-objective wind power scenario forecasting based on PG-GAN," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    10. Bouraoui, Zeineb & Jeguirim, Mejdi & Guizani, Chamseddine & Limousy, Lionel & Dupont, Capucine & Gadiou, Roger, 2015. "Thermogravimetric study on the influence of structural, textural and chemical properties of biomass chars on CO2 gasification reactivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 703-710.
    11. Eser, P. & Chokani, N. & Abhari, R., 2018. "Trade-offs between integration and isolation in Switzerland's energy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 19-27.
    12. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Energy and environmental costs in transitioning to zero and low emission trucks for the Australian truck Fleet: An industry perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Hu, Jinxing & Li, Hongru, 2022. "A transfer learning-based scenario generation method for stochastic optimal scheduling of microgrid with newly-built wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1139-1151.
    14. Epiney, A. & Rabiti, C. & Talbot, P. & Alfonsi, A., 2020. "Economic analysis of a nuclear hybrid energy system in a stochastic environment including wind turbines in an electricity grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Sandro Sacchelli & Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Dariusz Suszanowicz, 2022. "Ground-Mounted Photovoltaic and Crop Cultivation: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    17. Piotr Bielaczyc & Rafal Sala & Tomasz Meinicke, 2021. "Analysis of Technical Capabilities, Methodology and Test Results of a Light-Commercial Vehicle Conversion to Battery Electric Powertrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Jia Zhou & Hany Abdel-Khalik & Paul Talbot & Cristian Rabiti, 2021. "A Hybrid Energy System Workflow for Energy Portfolio Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Jang, Won-Jun & Jeong, Dae-Woon & Shim, Jae-Oh & Kim, Hak-Min & Roh, Hyun-Seog & Son, In Hyuk & Lee, Seung Jae, 2016. "Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 80-91.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2309.12085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.