IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9093-d613996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint in Vegeburger Production Technology Using a Prototype Forming and Breading Device

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska

    (Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Joanna Markowska

    (Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agata Bieńczak

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network—Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, 60-963 Poznan, Poland)

  • Paweł Woźniak

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network—Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, 60-963 Poznan, Poland)

  • Łukasz Ignasiak

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network—Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, 60-963 Poznan, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Polak

    (Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Kozłowicz

    (Department of Biological Basis of Food and Feed Technology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Renata Różyło

    (Department of Food Engineering and Machines, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the research was to develop a laboratory test stand for forming vegeburgers and to determine the carbon footprint of vegeburger production technology with the addition of frozen vegetable outgrades. This vegetable material is waste from frozen food production. During the research, unique recipes for vegeburgers fabricated of vegetable outgrades, potatoes, fiber, potato flour, salt and spices were also developed. The physicochemical properties, texture and color of vegeburgers were determined. The CO 2 to kWh conversion factor, with a value of 0.765 kg CO 2 ∙kWh −1 was used to calculate the carbon footprint. Vegeburgers obtained during the study were characterized by protein content ranging from 2.05 to 2.29 g 100 g −1 , carbohydrate content from 7.27 to 10.36 g 100 g −1 , fiber content ranging from 3.97 to 4.92 g 100 g −1 and fat content was at the level of 0.20–0.24 g 100 g −1 . The amount of sodium did not exceed 1 g 100 g −1 . The amount of disqualifying nutrients (fat, trans fat, saturated fat and cholesterol) was significantly lower compared to similar products on the market. The conducted analyses showed that the highest CO 2 emission occurred during the blanching process. The proportion of this process for small productions (2.0 kg) ranged from 62% to 68%. The process of vegeburger formation had the second largest percentage in emissions and accounts for 22% to 24% for small productions (2.0 kg). The total carbon footprint was 1.09–1.13 kg CO 2 /kg of product, respectively, i.e., about 0.10–0.12 kg CO 2 per one vegeburger. The research demonstrated that the process of producing vegeburgers from vegetable outgrades is a low-emission process compared with other agri-food technologies. Considering the above, this study allows for improvement of the management of waste from frozen food production, and is also the basis for the development of low-emission agri-food technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Joanna Markowska & Agata Bieńczak & Paweł Woźniak & Łukasz Ignasiak & Elżbieta Polak & Katarzyna Kozłowicz & Renata Różyło, 2021. "Carbon Footprint in Vegeburger Production Technology Using a Prototype Forming and Breading Device," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9093-:d:613996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhishek Chaudhary & Denis Tremorin, 2020. "Nutritional and Environmental Sustainability of Lentil Reformulated Beef Burger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Magdalena Karwacka & Agnieszka Ciurzyńska & Andrzej Lenart & Monika Janowicz, 2020. "Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector in Terms of the Carbon Footprint: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Toni Meier & Torsten von Borstel & Birgit Welte & Brennan Hogan & Steven M. Finn & Mike Bonaventura & Silke Friedrich & Kerstin Weber & Tanja Dräger de Teran, 2021. "Food Waste in Healthcare, Business and Hospitality Catering: Composition, Environmental Impacts and Reduction Potential on Company and National Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Mario Burgui-Burgui & Emilio Chuvieco, 2020. "Beyond Carbon Footprint Calculators. New Approaches for Linking Consumer Behaviour and Climate Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Al-Mansour, F. & Jejcic, V., 2017. "A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 7-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Ewelina Włodarczyk, 2023. "Comparison of Carbon Footprint Analysis Methods in Grain Processing—Studies Using Flour Production as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Joanna Markowska & Elżbieta Polak & Anna Drabent & Agnieszka Tyfa, 2022. "Innovative Management of Vegetable Outgrades as a Means of Food Loss and Waste Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasper Górny & Natalia Idaszewska & Zuzanna Sydow & Krzysztof Bieńczak, 2021. "Modelling the Carbon Footprint of Various Fruit and Vegetable Products Based on a Company’s Internal Transport Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Solinas, Stefania & Tiloca, Maria Teresa & Deligios, Paola A. & Cossu, Marco & Ledda, Luigi, 2021. "Carbon footprints and social carbon cost assessments in a perennial energy crop system: A comparison of fertilizer management practices in a Mediterranean area," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Gaurav Gaurav & Govind Sharan Dangayach & Makkhan Lal Meena & Vijay Chaudhary & Sumit Gupta & Sandeep Jagtap, 2023. "The Environmental Impacts of Bar Soap Production: Uncovering Sustainability Risks with LCA Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Ana Clara Borrego & Rute Abreu & Francisco Alegria Carreira & Filipe Caetano & Ana Lúcia Vasconcelos, 2023. "Environmental Taxation on the Agri-Food Sector and the Farm to Fork Strategy: The Portuguese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Cong Zheng & Quangui Pang & Tianpei Li & Guizheng Wang & Yiji Cai & Lei Yang, 2019. "The Farmers’ Channel Selection and Sustainable Analysis under Carbon Tax Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Or, Zeynep & Seppänen, Anna-Veera, 2024. "The role of the health sector in tackling climate change: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Denise Ott & Shashank Goyal & Rosmarie Reuss & Herwig O. Gutzeit & Jens Liebscher & Jens Dautz & Margo Degieter & Hans Steur & Emanuele Zannini, 2023. "LCA as decision support tool in the food and feed sector: evidence from R&D case studies," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 129-141, March.
    8. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Elżbieta Polak, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Analysis of Ice Cream Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Feng Yang & Zhong Wu & Xiaoyan Teng & Shaojian Qu, 2022. "Robust Counterpart Models for Fresh Agricultural Product Routing Planning Considering Carbon Emissions and Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Athanasia Orfanou & Stergios Vakalis & Christos Karelis & Charalampos Alexopoulos & Yannis Charalabidis & Demetris Francis Lekkas, 2023. "Assessing the Correlation between Citizen Science and Carbon Footprint: Introduction of COMPAIR’s CO 2 Calculator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Li Jia & Guanghua Qiao, 2022. "Quantification, Environmental Impact, and Behavior Management: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Global Food Waste Research Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Li Jia & Jing Zhang & Guanghua Qiao, 2022. "Scale and Environmental Impacts of Food Loss and Waste in China—A Material Flow Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Francesco Boenzi & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Bartolomeo Silvestri, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Supply Chain: Fresh Versus Semi-Finished Based Production Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Václav Voltr & Martin Hruška & Luboš Nobilis, 2021. "Complex Valuation of Energy from Agricultural Crops including Local Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Long Liang & Bradley G. Ridoutt & Liyuan Wang, 2021. "Food Security and Climate Stabilization: Can Cereal Production Systems Address Both?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Jianguo Li & Wenhui Yang & Yi Wang & Qiang Li & Lili Liu & Zhongqi Zhang, 2018. "Carbon Footprint and Driving Forces of Saline Agriculture in Coastally Reclaimed Areas of Eastern China: A Survey of Four Staple Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    18. Tatevik Yezekyan & Francesco Marinello & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "Definition of Reference Models for Power, Weight, Working Width, and Price for Seeding Machines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Devi Maulida Rahmah & Agusta Samodra Putra & Riaru Ishizaki & Ryozo Noguchi & Tofael Ahamed, 2022. "A Life Cycle Assessment of Organic and Chemical Fertilizers for Coffee Production to Evaluate Sustainability toward the Energy–Environment–Economic Nexus in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Iván García Kerdan & Sara Giarola & Ellis Skinner & Marin Tuleu & Adam Hawkes, 2020. "Modelling Future Agricultural Mechanisation of Major Crops in China: An Assessment of Energy Demand, Land Use and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9093-:d:613996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.