IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i17p6228-d1226491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Correlation between Citizen Science and Carbon Footprint: Introduction of COMPAIR’s CO 2 Calculator

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasia Orfanou

    (Waste Management Laboratory, Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100 Mytilene, Greece)

  • Stergios Vakalis

    (Energy Management Laboratory, Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100 Mytilene, Greece)

  • Christos Karelis

    (Information Systems Laboratory, Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece)

  • Charalampos Alexopoulos

    (Information Systems Laboratory, Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece)

  • Yannis Charalabidis

    (Information Systems Laboratory, Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200 Samos, Greece)

  • Demetris Francis Lekkas

    (Waste Management Laboratory, Department of Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100 Mytilene, Greece)

Abstract

The citizen’s carbon footprint is affected by various factors, but mostly by electricity consumption, daily transportation, travelling habits, as well as municipal solid waste management, a critical factor that is not frequently incorporated in carbon footprint estimations. This paper proposes a new carbon footprint calculator, the Carbon Footprint Simulation Dashboard—COMPAIR’s CO 2 calculator. The CO 2 calculator employs Citizen Science (CS) information in order to assist citizens in understanding and comparing how future carbon emissions will be modified in accordance with changes in their daily routines. The calculator offers several statistics, e.g., the country’s average carbon footprint and comparisons between EU members with respect to sectors that shape it, along with several recommendations for those domains where carbon footprint is significantly higher than the desired limits. The novelty of this tool is the integration of waste management strategies as a dimension of the total CO 2 calculation. In this framework, the study presents the development of the Carbon Footprint Simulation Dashboard while two different waste management scenarios are applied with different citizen behaviours on recycling and composting. The applications highlighted the consumption in buildings that account for almost 50% of the total CO 2 emissions, while the crucial role of transportation is also a key parameter. The different waste management scenarios showed a correlation between the CO 2 footprint and the overall consumption/disposal habits of citizens. In the case of advanced recycling and composting, waste management accounted for up to 7% of the CO 2 emissions, and this highlights the significance of behavioural choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasia Orfanou & Stergios Vakalis & Christos Karelis & Charalampos Alexopoulos & Yannis Charalabidis & Demetris Francis Lekkas, 2023. "Assessing the Correlation between Citizen Science and Carbon Footprint: Introduction of COMPAIR’s CO 2 Calculator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:17:p:6228-:d:1226491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Ciers & Aleksandra Mandic & Laszlo Daniel Toth & Giel Op ’t Veld, 2018. "Carbon Footprint of Academic Air Travel: A Case Study in Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Fenner, Andriel Evandro & Kibert, Charles Joseph & Woo, Junghoon & Morque, Shirley & Razkenari, Mohamad & Hakim, Hamed & Lu, Xiaoshu, 2018. "The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1142-1152.
    3. Mario Burgui-Burgui & Emilio Chuvieco, 2020. "Beyond Carbon Footprint Calculators. New Approaches for Linking Consumer Behaviour and Climate Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Edurne Loyarte-López & Mario Barral & Juan Carlos Morla, 2020. "Methodology for Carbon Footprint Calculation Towards Sustainable Innovation in Intangible Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad S. M. Almulhim & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2020. "A Resilience and Environmentally Sustainable Assessment Framework (RESAF) for Domestic Building Materials in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Lohne, Jardar & Bohne, Rolf André, 2022. "Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Farah Mneimneh & Hasan Ghazzawi & Seeram Ramakrishna, 2023. "Review Study of Energy Efficiency Measures in Favor of Reducing Carbon Footprint of Electricity and Power, Buildings, and Transportation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 447-474, March.
    4. Panagiotis Stavropoulos & Alexios Papacharalampopoulos & Konstantinos Tzimanis & Demetris Petrides & George Chryssolouris, 2021. "On the Relationship between Circular and Innovation Approach to Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Veronika Jezkova & Zuzana Rowland & Veronika Machova & Jan Hejda, 2020. "The Intrinsic Value of an Enterprise Determined by Means of the FCFE Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Aniqa Arslan & Arslan Qayyum & Mosab I. Tabash & Kiran Nair & Muhammad AsadUllah & Linda Nalini Daniel, 2023. "The Impact of Economic Complexity, Usage of Energy, Tourism, and Economic Growth on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence of 102 Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 315-324, September.
    7. Kun Lu & Xiaoyan Jiang & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Mengyun Li & Hongyu Wang & Bo Xia & Qing Chen, 2019. "Development of a Carbon Emissions Analysis Framework Using Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment for the Construction of Hospital Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Antoine Hardy, 2024. "Decarbonizing research laboratories? The tensions associated with the commensurability of carbon and how it opens up the boundaries of responsibility attribution," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 179-198, August.
    9. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Yaw-Shyan Tsay & Chiu-Yu Yeh & Yu-Han Chen & Mei-Chen Lu & Yu-Chen Lin, 2021. "A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of LCCO 2 for Building Envelope Renovation in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Wang, Longze & Mao, Yuteng & Li, Zhehan & Yi, Xinxing & Ma, Yiyi & Zhang, Yan & Li, Meicheng, 2024. "Life cycle carbon emission intensity assessment for photovoltaic greenhouses: A case study of Beijing City, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Hope Evwieroghene Orovwode & Simeon Matthew & Elizabeth Amuta & Felix Ayoade Agbetuyi & Isaac Odun-Ayo, 2021. "Carbon Footprint Evaluation and Environmental Sustainability Improvement through Capacity Optimization," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 454-459.
    13. Michał Pierzchalski & Elżbieta Dagny Ryńska & Arkadiusz Węglarz, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment as a Major Support Tool within Multi-Criteria Design Process of Single Dwellings Located in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Emilio Chuvieco & Mario Burgui-Burgui & Anabel Orellano & Gonzalo Otón & Paloma Ruíz-Benito, 2021. "Links between Climate Change Knowledge, Perception and Action: Impacts on Personal Carbon Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Michael Owusu-Kyei & Yusheng Kong & Michael Owusu Akomeah & Stephen Owusu Afriyie, 2023. "Corporate Governance and Total Quality Management Implementation in The Telecom Sector, Ghana," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 141-157, February.
    16. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Joanna Markowska & Agata Bieńczak & Paweł Woźniak & Łukasz Ignasiak & Elżbieta Polak & Katarzyna Kozłowicz & Renata Różyło, 2021. "Carbon Footprint in Vegeburger Production Technology Using a Prototype Forming and Breading Device," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Perčić, Maja & Ančić, Ivica & Vladimir, Nikola, 2020. "Life-cycle cost assessments of different power system configurations to reduce the carbon footprint in the Croatian short-sea shipping sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    18. Rui Liang & Xichuan Zheng & Po-Hsun Wang & Jia Liang & Linhui Hu, 2023. "Research Progress of Carbon-Neutral Design for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-50, August.
    19. Thorvaldsen, Kasper Emil & Korpås, Magnus & Lindberg, Karen Byskov & Farahmand, Hossein, 2021. "A stochastic operational planning model for a zero emission building with emission compensation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    20. Tsai, Yu-Chun & Feng, Yong-Qiang & Shuai, Yong & Lai, Jhao-Hong & Leung, Michael K.H. & Wei, Yen & Hsu, Hua-Yi & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2023. "Experimental validation of a 0.3 kW ORC for the future purposes in the study of low-grade thermal to power conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:17:p:6228-:d:1226491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.