IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13010-d939285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Supply Chain: Fresh Versus Semi-Finished Based Production Process

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Boenzi

    (Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Salvatore Digiesi

    (Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesco Facchini

    (Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

  • Bartolomeo Silvestri

    (Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

The agri-food supply chain is responsible for high GHG emissions. In industrial food processing, there is potential for reducing environmental impacts. In the case of apricot jam, several practices for realizing the finished product can be adopted. If, on the one hand, the scientific literature provides detailed studies on the economic aspects of the existing practices, on the other hand, a comprehensive assessment of the most common production practices from an environmental perspective is not provided. Apricot jam production can be based on two different kinds of raw materials: fresh fruit and the so-called “semi-finished product”, which is obtained by treating fresh fruits with mechanical and thermal processes. The most extended shelf-life of the semi-finished product allows for the adoption of more flexible production practices, leading to increased production performance and ensuring more efficient transportation strategies. In environmental terms, the convenience of this approach compared to adopting fresh fruit is questionable. The aim of this paper is to compare the environmental impacts due to these two different production and transport practices of apricot jam. Consistent with this end, a Life Cycle Assessment methodology has been adopted to evaluate the environmental impact of each step in the apricot jam supply chain. Research results suggest that the use of fresh apricots in the production of jams has a lower environmental impact (about 50–65% without considering transport activities) than the use of semi-finished products, and that losses due to the short shelf-life of fresh fruit limits the transportation distance of the raw and fresh material, also depending on the transport mode adopted (in the range of 875–4450 km). This highlights the need to adopt more clean and sustainable practices in the current industrial food processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Boenzi & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Bartolomeo Silvestri, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Supply Chain: Fresh Versus Semi-Finished Based Production Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13010-:d:939285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Karwacka & Agnieszka Ciurzyńska & Andrzej Lenart & Monika Janowicz, 2020. "Sustainable Development in the Agri-Food Sector in Terms of the Carbon Footprint: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Evanthia A. Nanaki & Christopher J. Koroneos, 2018. "Sustainable Peach Compote Production: A Life Cycle Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taufik Nur & Akhmad Hidayatno & Andri D. Setiawan & Komarudin Komarudin & Amalia Suzianti, 2023. "Environmental Impact Analysis to Achieve Sustainability for Artisan Chocolate Products Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasper Górny & Natalia Idaszewska & Zuzanna Sydow & Krzysztof Bieńczak, 2021. "Modelling the Carbon Footprint of Various Fruit and Vegetable Products Based on a Company’s Internal Transport Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Gaurav Gaurav & Govind Sharan Dangayach & Makkhan Lal Meena & Vijay Chaudhary & Sumit Gupta & Sandeep Jagtap, 2023. "The Environmental Impacts of Bar Soap Production: Uncovering Sustainability Risks with LCA Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Paraskevopoulou, Christina & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Bechtsis, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum, 2022. "An assessment of circular economy interventions in the peach canning industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Ana Clara Borrego & Rute Abreu & Francisco Alegria Carreira & Filipe Caetano & Ana Lúcia Vasconcelos, 2023. "Environmental Taxation on the Agri-Food Sector and the Farm to Fork Strategy: The Portuguese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Hessampour, Reza & Bastani, Aboubakr & Hassani, Mehrdad & Failla, Sabina & Vaverková, Magdalena Daria & Halog, Anthony, 2023. "Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of energy, exergy, environmental effects, and water footprint in the canned apple supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Joanna Markowska & Agata Bieńczak & Paweł Woźniak & Łukasz Ignasiak & Elżbieta Polak & Katarzyna Kozłowicz & Renata Różyło, 2021. "Carbon Footprint in Vegeburger Production Technology Using a Prototype Forming and Breading Device," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13010-:d:939285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.