IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i12p186-d186343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Definition of Reference Models for Power, Weight, Working Width, and Price for Seeding Machines

Author

Listed:
  • Tatevik Yezekyan

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Via dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Francesco Marinello

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Via dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Giannantonio Armentano

    (Edizioni L’Informatore Agrario srl, Via Bencivenga - Biondani, 16, 37133 Verona, Italy)

  • Samuele Trestini

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Via dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Luigi Sartori

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Via dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

Abstract

Machine functional parameters define fleet composition and management and, thus, play an important role in economic and environmental performance. Large availability of programming methods and decision support systems are available in the market, however, there is still a lack of applicative tools to forecast the perceived and necessary technical parameters and machinery price options to complete tasks. In the current research, most correlated functional parameters for four group of seeding machines were determined with the application of linear and multiple linear regression analyses. Power, weight, working width, number of rows, and list price were studied, and reference equations were developed for seed drills, precision, combined and no-tillage planters. Two statistical analyses models were, therefore, developed for each of the groups in order to allow evaluation and prediction of performance and cost, thus contributing to the selection process optimisation and perceived choice of the needed implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatevik Yezekyan & Francesco Marinello & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "Definition of Reference Models for Power, Weight, Working Width, and Price for Seeding Machines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:12:p:186-:d:186343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/12/186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/12/186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray, J.R. & Tullberg, J.N. & Basnet, B.B., 2006. "Planters and their Components: Types, attributes, functional requirements, classification and description," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 114069.
    2. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Volodymyr Nadykto & Semjons Ivanovs, 2018. "A Mathematical Model of the Plane-Parallel Movement of an Asymmetric Machine-and-Tractor Aggregate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Brian Sims & Jennifer Heney, 2017. "Promoting Smallholder Adoption of Conservation Agriculture through Mechanization Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Gass, Graham & Biggs, Stephen & Kelly, Aiden, 1997. "Stakeholders, science and decision making for poverty-focused rural mechanization research and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 115-126, January.
    5. Brian Sims & Josef Kienzle, 2017. "Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization for Smallholders: What Is It and How Can We Implement It?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, June.
    6. John J. Glen, 1987. "Feature Article—Mathematical Models in Farm Planning: A Survey," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 641-666, October.
    7. Andrés Weintraub & Carlos Romero, 2006. "Operations Research Models and the Management of Agricultural and Forestry Resources: A Review and Comparison," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 446-457, October.
    8. Reidsma, Pytrik & Janssen, Sander & Jansen, Jacques & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2018. "On the development and use of farm models for policy impact assessment in the European Union – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 111-125.
    9. Cavallo, Eugenio & Ferrari, Ester & Bollani, Luigi & Coccia, Mario, 2014. "Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-54.
    10. Al-Mansour, F. & Jejcic, V., 2017. "A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 7-15.
    11. Laura Vincent-Caboud & Joséphine Peigné & Marion Casagrande & Erin M. Silva, 2017. "Overview of Organic Cover Crop-Based No-Tillage Technique in Europe: Farmers’ Practices and Research Challenges," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatevik Yezekyan & Francesco Marinello & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori, 2020. "Modelling of Harvesting Machines’ Technical Parameters and Prices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Tatevik Yezekyan & Marco Benetti & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori & Francesco Marinello, 2021. "Definition of Reference Models for Power, Mass, Working Width, and Price for Tillage Implements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Alessia Cogato & Andrea Pezzuolo & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Roberta De Bei & Marco Sozzi & Francesco Marinello, 2020. "A GIS-Based Multicriteria Index to Evaluate the Mechanisability Potential of Italian Vineyard Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuelan Li & Rui Guan, 2023. "How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Wenbo Zhang & Wilbert Wilhelm, 2011. "OR/MS decision support models for the specialty crops industry: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 131-148, October.
    3. Miguel A. Lejeune & Janne Kettunen, 2017. "Managing Reliability and Stability Risks in Forest Harvesting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 620-638, October.
    4. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    5. Venn, Tyron J. & Dorries, Jack W. & McGavin, Robert L., 2021. "A mathematical model to support investment in veneer and LVL manufacturing in subtropical eastern Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Tuğçe Taşkıner & Bilge Bilgen, 2021. "Optimization Models for Harvest and Production Planning in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Giacomo Falchetta & Nicolò Stevanato & Magda Moner-Girona & Davide Mazzoni & Emanuela Colombo & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," Working Papers 2020.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. Selorm Yaotse Dorvlo & Elizabeth Mkandawire & Katy Roelich & Charles Blessings Jumbe, 2023. "Pathways and Interactions for Integrating Mechanisation into Sustainable Agricultural Production: The Case of Rice Production in Asutsuare, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Mario Coccia, 2019. "Killer Technologies: the destructive creation in the technical change," Papers 1907.12406, arXiv.org.
    10. Tarun Jain & Jishnu Hazra & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Analysis of upstream pricing regulation and contract structure in an agriculture supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 85-122, January.
    11. Schreefel, L. & de Boer, I.J.M. & Timler, C.J. & Groot, J.C.J. & Zwetsloot, M.J. & Creamer, R.E. & Schrijver, A. Pas & van Zanten, H.H.E. & Schulte, R.P.O., 2022. "How to make regenerative practices work on the farm: A modelling framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Ramos, Francisco López & Batres, Rafael & De-la-Cruz-Márquez, Cynthia Griselle & Anzures, Melina López, 2023. "Optimization models for nopal crop planning with land usage expansion and government subsidy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Tatevik Yezekyan & Marco Benetti & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori & Francesco Marinello, 2021. "Definition of Reference Models for Power, Mass, Working Width, and Price for Tillage Implements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Chintapalli, Prashant, 2023. "Optimal multi-period crop procurement and distribution policy with minimum support prices," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Mustapha Ouhimmou & Sophie D'Amours & Robert Beauregard & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Satyaveer Singh Chauhan, 2009. "Optimization Helps Shermag Gain Competitive Edge," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 329-345, August.
    16. Zhiqi Zheng & Hongbo Zhao & Zhengdao Liu & Jin He & Wenzheng Liu, 2021. "Research Progress and Development of Mechanized Potato Planters: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Miroslav Macák & Jana Galambošová & František Kumhála & Marek Barát & Milan Kroulík & Karol Šinka & Petr Novák & Vladimír Rataj & Paula A. Misiewicz, 2023. "Reduction in Water Erosion and Soil Loss on Steep Land Managed by Controlled Traffic Farming," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Liu, Xuan & van Kooten, Gerrit Cornelis & Duan, Jun, 2020. "Calibration of agricultural risk programming models using positive mathematical programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), July.
    19. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Britz, Wolfgang & Ciaian, Pavel & Gocht, Alexander & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Kremmydas, Dimitrios & Müller, Marc & Petsakos, Athanasios & Reidsma, Pytrik, 2021. "A design for a generic and modular bio-economic farm model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:12:p:186-:d:186343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.