IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8409-d603094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Collaborative Problem Solving Behavioral Transition Patterns in Science of Taiwanese Students at Age 15 According to Mastering Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Hsuan Li

    (Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403454, Taiwan)

  • Pei-Ling Tsai

    (Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403454, Taiwan)

  • Zhi-Yong Liu

    (Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Chieh Huang

    (Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403454, Taiwan)

  • Pei-Jyun Hsieh

    (Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403454, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study analyzed the collaborative problem solving (CPS) behavioral transition patterns of 53,859 Taiwanese students in science at age 15 by using an online Taiwanese CPS assessment that was designed according to the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 CPS framework. Because of behavioral changes over the testing period, the CPS target skills that corresponded to the assessment items can be viewed as a CPS behavioral sequence. Hence, a lag sequential analysis was applied to explore the significance of the interactions among the CPS skills. The behavioral sequence is coded according to the level of mastery (0, 1, or 2) of items. The CPS transition patterns were analyzed in three gaps, namely the gender gap, the urban–rural gap, and the achievement gap. The findings showed that “Monitoring and repairing the shared understanding” was a crucial CPS skill in science. Moreover, the female students who would follow rules of engagement effectively exhibited higher scores than male students did in monitoring the results of their actions and evaluating their success in solving the problem. No obvious differences were observed in the urban–rural gap, whereas differences were observed in the achievement gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Hsuan Li & Pei-Ling Tsai & Zhi-Yong Liu & Wen-Chieh Huang & Pei-Jyun Hsieh, 2021. "Exploring Collaborative Problem Solving Behavioral Transition Patterns in Science of Taiwanese Students at Age 15 According to Mastering Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8409-:d:603094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Mo, 2017. "Collaborative problem solving," PISA in Focus 78, OECD Publishing.
    2. Rodrigo Lozano & Michelle Y. Merrill & Kaisu Sammalisto & Kim Ceulemans & Francisco J. Lozano, 2017. "Connecting Competences and Pedagogical Approaches for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Framework Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Gisela Cebrián & Ramon Palau & Jordi Mogas, 2020. "The Smart Classroom as a Means to the Development of ESD Methodologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2019. "A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 405-418, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos González-Salamanca & Olga Lucía Agudelo & Jesús Salinas, 2020. "Key Competences, Education for Sustainable Development and Strategies for the Development of 21st Century Skills. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Rocío Valderrama-Hernández & Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & Lucía Alcántara Rubio & Dolores Limón-Domínguez, 2019. "Methodology to Analyze the Effectiveness of ESD in a Higher Degree in Education. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Sebastian Brumann & Ulrike Ohl & Johannes Schulz, 2022. "Inquiry-Based Learning on Climate Change in Upper Secondary Education: A Design-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Werner Riess & Monika Martin & Christoph Mischo & Hans-Georg Kotthoff & Eva-Maria Waltner, 2022. "How Can Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Be Effectively Implemented in Teaching and Learning? An Analysis of Educational Science Recommendations of Methods and Procedures to Promote ESD Goa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Jongseok Ahn, 2020. "Unequal Loneliness in the Digitalized Classroom: Two Loneliness Effects of School Computers and Lessons for Sustainable Education in the E-Learning Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Kifah Imara & Fahriye Altinay, 2021. "Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Janka Medová & Kristína Ovary Bulková & Soňa Čeretková, 2020. "Relations between Generalization, Reasoning and Combinatorial Thinking in Solving Mathematical Open-Ended Problems within Mathematical Contest," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Campbell, Throy Alexander, 2018. "A phenomenological study of business graduates' employment experiences in the changing economy," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 52(1), pages 1-4.
    10. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Carolina Feliciana Machado & João Paulo Davim, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Bibliometric Approach—What, Where and Who Is Doing Research in This Subject?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro-Gen & Francisco J. Lozano & Kaisu Sammalisto, 2019. "Teaching Sustainability in European Higher Education Institutions: Assessing the Connections between Competences and Pedagogical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Mirjam Braßler & Martin Schultze, 2021. "Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Pilar Colás-Bravo & Patrizia Magnoler & Jesús Conde-Jiménez, 2018. "Identification of Levels of Sustainable Consciousness of Teachers in Training through an E-Portfolio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Valeria Andreoni & Valeria Ruiz Vargas, 2020. "Tracking the Interlinkages across SDGs: The Case of Hill Centered Education Network in Bogota, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Charlotte R. Clark & Tavey M. Capps, 2020. "Synergy of the (Campus) Commons: Integrating Campus-Based Team Projects in an Introductory Sustainability Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Maria Rosario Perello-Marín & Gabriela Ribes-Giner & Odette Pantoja Díaz, 2018. "Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Asma Fahim & Qingmei Tan & Bushra Naz & Qurat ul Ain & Sibghat Ullah Bazai, 2021. "Sustainable Higher Education Reform Quality Assessment Using SWOT Analysis with Integration of AHP and Entropy Models: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Katerina Tzafilkou, 2020. "The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information Technology for a Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Marit Kristine List & Fabian T. C. Schmidt & Daria Mundt & Dennis Föste-Eggers, 2020. "Still Green at Fifteen? Investigating Environmental Awareness of the PISA 2015 Population: Cross-National Differences and Correlates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8409-:d:603094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.