IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6268-d394232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information Technology for a Sustainable Education

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana Mâță

    (Teacher Training Department, Vasile Alecsandri University of Bacău, 600115 Bacau, Romania)

  • Otilia Clipa

    (Educational Sciences Department, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720029 Suceava, Romania)

  • Katerina Tzafilkou

    (Department of Information System, University of Macedonia, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

A self-administered measurement tool was developed and validated to provide data regarding ethical attitude of university teachers for a sustainable education. The research was based on several factors involved in forming attitudes towards the unethical information technology use. The sample: 334 Romanian teachers’ respondents who teach in the higher education system contributed to this research. A successions of factor analyses and structural equation modeling showed that a second-order model is a good fit for experimental data (χ2/df = 1.75, comparative fit index = 0.958, root mean square error of approximation = 0.045), however the partial least square (PLS-SEM) CFA approach revealed higher scores of factor loadings, implying the best fit to the model. This research suggested a structural model of ethical attitude of university teachers, composed by four factors measured by 13 indices. The results demonstrated that PLS-SEM CFA is appropriate for creating a valid structural model to measure university teachers’ ICT ethical attitude. The current research predicted a theoretical contribution to the field of ethical attitude of university teachers within a sustainable education context.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Katerina Tzafilkou, 2020. "The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure University Teachers’ Attitude towards Ethical Use of Information Technology for a Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6268-:d:394232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Kaiser, 1958. "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 187-200, September.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Rodrigo Lozano & Michelle Y. Merrill & Kaisu Sammalisto & Kim Ceulemans & Francisco J. Lozano, 2017. "Connecting Competences and Pedagogical Approaches for Sustainable Development in Higher Education: A Literature Review and Framework Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Rafael Miñano Rubio & Diego Uribe & Ana Moreno-Romero & Susana Yáñez, 2019. "Embedding Sustainability Competences into Engineering Education. The Case of Informatics Engineering and Industrial Engineering Degree Programs at Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Francisco Zamora-Polo & Jesús Sánchez-Martín, 2019. "Teaching for a Better World. Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals in the Construction of a Change-Maker University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Ali ACILAR & Durmus YORUK, 2010. "Gender Differences in Computer Ethics among Business Administration Students," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 5-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nieves Gutiérrez-Ángel & Jesús-Nicasio García-Sánchez & Isabel Mercader-Rubio & Judit García-Martín & Sonia Brito-Costa, 2022. "Digital Competence, Validation and Differential Patterns between Spanish and Portuguese Areas as Assessed from the Latest PISA Report as a Pathway to Sustainable Education and Social Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Samantha Broadhead & Karen Tobias-Green & Sharon Hooper, 2023. "A Conversation about Ethics: A Deliberative and Practice-Based Approach to Ethics in Arts Education," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Bhakta S, Sudheer & Rodrigues, Lewlyn LR & Sriram, K.V., 2023. "Assessing water conservation behaviour of India's urban households," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Juan Chu & Ruyi Lin & Zihan Qin & Ruining Chen & Ligao Lou & Junfeng Yang, 2023. "Exploring factors influencing pre-service teacher’s digital teaching competence and the mediating effects of data literacy: empirical evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Ozdemir, Dilek & Sharma, Mahak & Dhir, Amandeep & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Md Shahzalal & Hamedi Mohd Adnan, 2022. "Attitude, Self-Control, and Prosocial Norm to Predict Intention to Use Social Media Responsibly: From Scale to Model Fit towards a Modified Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    7. Fazilah Hatta Antah & Muhamad Azry Khoiry & Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud & Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Use of Geospatial Technology with LiDAR for Road Design: Case of Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Aigerim Kozhabergenova & Erika Kopp, 2021. "Preparation of Economics Teachers in Kazakhstan," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Otilia Clipa (ed.), ATEE 2020 - Winter Conference. Teacher Education for Promoting Well-Being in School. Suceava, 2020, edition 1, volume 16, chapter 16, pages 229-246, Editura Lumen.
    9. Katerina Tzafilkou & Liliana Mâță & Gabriela Livia Curpănaru & Ionuț Viorel Stoica & Lucian Nicolae Voinea & Constantin Șufaru, 2022. "A Comprehensive Instrument to Measure Teachers’ Attitude towards Quality Management in the Context of Online Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Liliana Mâță & Otilia Clipa & Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu & Viorel Robu & Tatiana Dobrescu & Carlos Hervás-Gómez & Ionuț Viorel Stoica, 2021. "Students’ Attitude towards the Sustainable Use of Mobile Technologies in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Raquel Barragán-Sánchez & María-Carmen Corujo-Vélez & Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez & Pedro Román-Graván, 2020. "Teaching Digital Competence and Eco-Responsible Use of Technologies: Development and Validation of a Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Míriam Hernández-Barco & Jesús Sánchez-Martín & José Blanco-Salas & Trinidad Ruiz-Téllez, 2020. "Teaching Down to Earth —Service-Learning Methodology for Science Education and Sustainability at the University Level: A Practical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Rocío Valderrama-Hernández & Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & Lucía Alcántara Rubio & Dolores Limón-Domínguez, 2019. "Methodology to Analyze the Effectiveness of ESD in a Higher Degree in Education. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Werner Riess & Monika Martin & Christoph Mischo & Hans-Georg Kotthoff & Eva-Maria Waltner, 2022. "How Can Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Be Effectively Implemented in Teaching and Learning? An Analysis of Educational Science Recommendations of Methods and Procedures to Promote ESD Goa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Meoli, Azzurra & Fini, Riccardo & Sobrero, Maurizio & Wiklund, Johan, 2020. "How entrepreneurial intentions influence entrepreneurial career choices: The moderating influence of social context," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    5. Sabi, Humphrey M. & Uzoka, Faith-Michael E. & Langmia, Kehbuma & Njeh, Felix N., 2016. "Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 183-191.
    6. Ya-Hui Want, 2014. "Does Online Trading Affect Investors' Trading Intention?," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(5), pages 71-79.
    7. Jaime González-Domínguez & Gonzalo Sánchez-Barroso & Francisco Zamora-Polo & Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo, 2020. "Application of Circular Economy Techniques for Design and Development of Products through Collaborative Project-Based Learning for Industrial Engineer Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Jingnan Zhang & Shichun Xu & Zhengxia He & Chengze Li & Xiaona Meng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles under a Subsidy Deduction: From Different City-Level Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Enrique Carmona-Medeiro & José María Cardeñoso Domingo, 2021. "Social Interaction: A Crucial Means to Promote Sustainability in Initial Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Jennifer Roberts & Gurleen Popli & Rosemary J. Harris, 2018. "Do environmental concerns affect commuting choices?: hybrid choice modelling with household survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(1), pages 299-320, January.
    11. Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & David López & Carme Martín & Eva Vidal & Jose Cabré & Joan Climent, 2020. "The Sustainability Matrix: A Tool for Integrating and Assessing Sustainability in the Bachelor and Master Theses of Engineering Degrees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Klaudia Zwolińska & Sylwia Lorenc & Radosław Pomykała, 2022. "Sustainable Development in Education from Students’ Perspective—Implementation of Sustainable Development in Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Cardona Montoya, Raúl Armando & Martins, Izaias & Velásquez Ceballos, Hermilson, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation, assessment and management of projects and impact in corporate entrepreneurship: intention to action," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    14. Mª del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Ligia Isabel Estrada-Vidal & Francisca Ruiz-Garzón & Rafael López-Cordero & Laila Mohamed-Mohand, 2019. "Making Future Teachers More Aware of Issues Related to Sustainability: An Assessment of Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Miguel Leiva-Brondo & Natalia Lajara-Camilleri & Anna Vidal-Meló & Alejandro Atarés & Cristina Lull, 2022. "Spanish University Students’ Awareness and Perception of Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainability Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
    16. Ya-Hui Wang, 2014. "All You Can Eat: Behavioral Evidence From Taiwan," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 29-37.
    17. Esther García-González & Rocío Jiménez-Fontana & Pilar Azcárate, 2020. "Education for Sustainability and the Sustainable Development Goals: Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions and Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Hogi Jung & Yaki Yang, 2022. "Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Social Justice Scale in Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Pere Busquets & Jordi Segalas & Antonio Gomera & Miguel Antúnez & Jorge Ruiz-Morales & Silvia Albareda-Tiana & Rafael Miñano, 2021. "Sustainability Education in the Spanish Higher Education System: Faculty Practice, Concerns and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Torres Velásquez, Jairo Adolfo & Valencia Arias, Alejandro & Bermúdez Hernández, Jonathan & Díez Echavarría, Luisa Fernanda & Urrego Marín, María Lucelly & Maussa Pérez, Fausto Orlando, 2018. "Characterization of entrepreneurial intention in university students as from Systemic Entrepreneurship Intention Model: a case study," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6268-:d:394232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.