IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8347-d601988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Integrated Structure for the Tri-Generation of Power, Liquid Carbon Dioxide, and Medium Pressure Steam Using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell, a Dual Pressure Linde-Hampson Liquefaction Plant, and a Heat Recovery Steam Generator

Author

Listed:
  • Bahram Ghorbani

    (Faculty of Engineering Modern Technologies, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies, Amol 46156-64616, Iran)

Abstract

Due to the increase in energy consumption and energy prices, the reduction in fossil fuel resources, and increasing concerns about global warming and environmental issues, it is necessary to develop more efficient energy conversion systems with low environmental impacts. Utilizing fuel cells in the combined process is a method of refrigeration and electricity simultaneous production with a high efficiency and low pollution. In this study, a combined process for the tri-generation of electricity, medium pressure steam, and liquid carbon dioxide by utilizing a molten carbonate fuel cell, a dual pressure Linde-Hampson liquefaction plant and a heat recovery steam generator is developed. This combined process produces 65.53 MW of electricity, 27.8 kg/s of medium pressure steam, and 142.9 kg/s of liquid carbon dioxide. One of the methods of long-term energy storage involves the use of a carbon dioxide liquefaction system. Some of the generated electricity is used in industrial and residential areas and the rest is used for storage as liquid carbon dioxide. Liquid carbon dioxide can be used for peak shavings in buildings. The waste heat from the Linde-Hampson liquefaction plant is used to produce the fuel cell inlet steam. Moreover, the exhaust heat of the fuel cell and gas turbine would be used to produce the medium pressure steam. The total efficiency of this combined process and the coefficient of performance of the refrigeration plant are 82.21% and 1.866, respectively. The exergy analysis of this combined process reveals that the exergy efficiency and the total exergy destruction are 73.18% and 102.7 MW, respectively. The highest rate of exergy destruction in the hybrid process equipment belongs to the fuel cell (37.72%), the HX6 heat exchanger (8.036%), and the HX7 heat exchanger (6.578%). The results of the sensitivity analysis show that an increase in the exit pressure of the V1 valve by 13.33% would result in an increase in the refrigeration energy by 2.151% and a reduction in the refrigeration cycle performance by 9.654%. Moreover, by increasing the inlet fuel to the fuel cell, the thermal efficiency of the whole combined process rises by 18.09%, and the whole exergy efficiency declines by 12.95%.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahram Ghorbani, 2021. "Development of an Integrated Structure for the Tri-Generation of Power, Liquid Carbon Dioxide, and Medium Pressure Steam Using a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell, a Dual Pressure Linde-Hampson Liquefaction ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8347-:d:601988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jia & Chen, Haisheng & Xu, Yujie & Wang, Liang & Tan, Chunqing, 2014. "A solar energy storage and power generation system based on supercritical carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 43-51.
    2. Ghorbani, Bahram & Salehi, Gholamreza & Ebrahimi, Armin & Taghavi, Masoud, 2021. "Energy, exergy and pinch analyses of a novel energy storage structure using post-combustion CO2 separation unit, dual pressure Linde-Hampson liquefaction system, two-stage organic Rankine cycle and ge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Parikhani, Towhid & Ghaebi, Hadi & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2018. "A novel geothermal combined cooling and power cycle based on the absorption power cycle: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 265-277.
    4. Duan, Liqiang & Yue, Long & Qu, Wanjun & Yang, Yongping, 2015. "Study on CO2 capture from molten carbonate fuel cell hybrid system integrated with oxygen ion transfer membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 20-30.
    5. Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Chiesa, Paolo, 2013. "Using MCFC for high efficiency CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles: Comparison of internal and external reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 772-783.
    6. Duan, Liqiang & Sun, Siyu & Yue, Long & Qu, Wanjun & Yang, Yongping, 2015. "Study on a new IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle) system with CO2 capture by integrating MCFC (Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 490-503.
    7. Haghighat Mamaghani, Alireza & Najafi, Behzad & Shirazi, Ali & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2015. "4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of an integrated MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cell) and ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 650-663.
    8. Ghaebi, Hadi & Parikhani, Towhid & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2018. "A novel trigeneration system using geothermal heat source and liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 513-527.
    9. Ahmadi, Mohammad H. & Jokar, Mohammad Ali & Ming, Tingzhen & Feidt, Michel & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Astaraei, Fatemeh Razi, 2018. "Multi-objective performance optimization of irreversible molten carbonate fuel cell–Braysson heat engine and thermodynamic analysis with ecological objective approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 707-722.
    10. Mohammed, Hanin & Al-Othman, Amani & Nancarrow, Paul & Tawalbeh, Muhammad & El Haj Assad, Mamdouh, 2019. "Direct hydrocarbon fuel cells: A promising technology for improving energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 207-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lianbo Mu & Suilin Wang & Guichang Liu & Junhui Lu & Yuncheng Lan & Liqiu Zhao & Jincheng Liu, 2023. "On-Site Experimental Study on Low-Temperature Deep Waste Heat Recovery of Actual Flue Gas from the Reformer of Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Tatiana Victorovna Morozova & Reza Alayi & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mohsen Sharifpur & Yaser Ebazadeh, 2022. "Investigation and Optimization of the Performance of Energy Systems in the Textile Industry by Using CHP Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Ning Ren & Xiufan Zhang & Decheng Fan, 2022. "Influencing Factors and Realization Path of Power Decarbonization—Based on Panel Data Analysis of 30 Provinces in China from 2011 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akrami, Ehsan & Ameri, Mohammad & Rocco, Matteo V., 2021. "Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power productio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Wang, Fu & Deng, Shuai & Zhang, Houcheng & Wang, Jiatang & Zhao, Jiapei & Miao, He & Yuan, Jinliang & Yan, Jinyue, 2020. "A comprehensive review on high-temperature fuel cells with carbon capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Li, Yongyi & Liu, Yujia & Zhang, Guoqiang & Yang, Yongping, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system utilizing liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic energy and low-temperature waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Ghorbani, Bahram & Salehi, Gholamreza & Ebrahimi, Armin & Taghavi, Masoud, 2021. "Energy, exergy and pinch analyses of a novel energy storage structure using post-combustion CO2 separation unit, dual pressure Linde-Hampson liquefaction system, two-stage organic Rankine cycle and ge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Towards net-zero emission cement and power production using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    6. Turi, Davide Maria & Chiesa, Paolo & Macchi, Ennio & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2016. "High fidelity model of the oxygen flux across ion transport membrane reactor: Mechanism characterization using experimental data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 127-141.
    7. Nazila Nematzadeh & Hadi Ghaebi & Ebrahim Abdi Aghdam, 2022. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of Innovative Integrated Power Cycles for Low-Temperature Heat Sources Based on Heat Transformer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Duan, Liqiang & Yue, Long & Feng, Tao & Lu, Hao & Bian, Jing, 2016. "Study on a novel pressurized MCFC hybrid system with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 737-750.
    9. Zhang, Shihan & Shen, Yao & Wang, Lidong & Chen, Jianmeng & Lu, Yongqi, 2019. "Phase change solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture: Principle, advances, and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 876-897.
    10. Hai, Tao & Chaturvedi, Rishabh & Marjan, Riyam K. & Almujibah, Hamad & Van Thuong, Ta & Soliman, Naglaa F. & El-Shafai, Walid, 2024. "Tri-objective optimization of electricity, fresh water, and hydrogen production in a biomass-driven trigeneration plant: Thermoeconomic and environmental evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    11. Ahn, Ji Ho & Kim, Tong Seop, 2020. "Effect of oxygen supply method on the performance of a micro gas turbine-based triple combined cycle with oxy-combustion carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Nhuchhen, Daya R., 2023. "Integrated gasification carbon capture plant using molten carbonate fuel cell: An application to a cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Jing Bian & Liqiang Duan & Yongping Yang, 2023. "Simulation and Economic Investigation of CO 2 Separation from Gas Turbine Exhaust Gas by Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell with Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Selective Exhaust Gas Recirculation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    14. sattari sadat, Seyed mohammad & Mirabdolah Lavasani, Arash & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2019. "Economic and thermodynamic evaluation of a new solid oxide fuel cell based polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 515-533.
    15. Sattari Sadat, Seyed Mohammad & Ghaebi, Hadi & Lavasani, Arash Mirabdolah, 2020. "4E analyses of an innovative polygeneration system based on SOFC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 986-1007.
    16. Ahn, Ji Ho & Seo, Min Hyung & Kim, Tong Seop, 2021. "Efficiency maximization of a quadruple power generation system with zero carbon emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Szczęśniak, Arkadiusz & Milewski, Jarosław & Szabłowski, Łukasz & Bujalski, Wojciech & Dybiński, Olaf, 2020. "Dynamic model of a molten carbonate fuel cell 1 kW stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Sadeghi, Saber & Askari, Ighball Baniasad, 2019. "Prefeasibility techno-economic assessment of a hybrid power plant with photovoltaic, fuel cell and Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 409-424.
    19. Abdollahipour, Armin & Sayyaadi, Hoseyn, 2021. "Thermal energy recovery of molten carbonate fuel cells by thermally regenerative electrochemical cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Wang, Mingtao & Zhang, Juan & Liu, Huanwei, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of two low-grade energy driven transcritical CO2 combined cooling, heating and power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8347-:d:601988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.