IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10061-d454943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Mirna Kordab

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė

    (Research Group on Logistics and Defense Technology Management, General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Silo st. 5A, LT-10322, Vilnius, Lithuania
    Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026, Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Organizations operating in the intensive knowledge-based sector seek efficient management approaches and sustainable development practices to perform efficiently in the dynamic business environment. Knowledge management practice and organizational learning are significant factors in order to achieve sustainable organizational performance in a rapidly changing business environment. Based on the scientific literature analysis, there is still a lack of evidence related to the mediating role of the whole knowledge management cycle, including the five knowledge management processes (knowledge acquisition, creation, storage, sharing, and application) in the relationship between organizational learning and sustainable organizational performance for organizations operating in intensive knowledge-based sectors. This study aimed to examine the impact of the whole knowledge management cycle on the relationship between organizational learning and sustainable organizational performance in intensive knowledge-based sectors, specifically the audit and consulting companies in the Middle East region. Systematic scientific literature analysis, expert evaluation (structured questionnaire), and structural equation modeling (SEM) technique were used to develop and verify the research model. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire distributed among auditing experts working in a knowledge-based sector—audit and consulting companies in the Middle East region. The research results supported the hypotheses stating that organizational learning positively affects knowledge acquisition, storage, sharing, application processes, and sustainable organizational performance. However, the results verified that organizational learning has an insignificant impact on the Middle Eastern audit and consulting companies’ knowledge creation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10061-:d:454943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Marieta Olaru & Doina I. Popescu, 2018. "An Exploratory Study on Knowledge Management Process Barriers in the Oil Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors’ knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Post-Print halshs-01225834, HAL.
    3. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The Dynamics of Knowledge-intensive Sectors' Knowledge Base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 215-242, April.
    4. Yongan Zhang & Umair Khan & Seoyeon Lee & Madiha Salik, 2019. "The Influence of Management Innovation and Technological Innovation on Organization Performance. A Mediating Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Rani Jeanne Dang & Maureen McKelvey, 2016. "Knowledge management processes and the formation of entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 31-59.
    6. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    7. M. Shakaib Akram & M. Awais Shakir Goraya & Aneela Malik & Amer M. Aljarallah, 2018. "Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    9. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende & Carla Curado, 2019. "Human Resource Management Contributions to Knowledge Sharing for a Sustainability-Oriented Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors' knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Post-Print hal-02118411, HAL.
    11. Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Knowledge Management, Innovation and Big Data: Implications for Sustainability, Policy Making and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-7, June.
    12. Liu, Chih-Hsing Sam, 2018. "Examining social capital, organizational learning and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 258-270.
    13. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 542-554, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lilian. O. Iheukwumere-Esotu & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo, 2021. "Knowledge Criticality Assessment and Codification Framework for Major Maintenance Activities: A Case Study of Cement Rotary Kiln Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Eftychia Kessopoulou & Katerina Gotzamani & Styliani Xanthopoulou & George Tsiotras, 2023. "Conceptualizing and Validating a Model for Benchlearning Capability: Results from the Greek Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Shi Qiao & Qiankun Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Relational Capital on Organizational Performance in Supply Chain: The Mediating Role of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yanwei Sun & Dazhuo Mo & Ting Nie, 2022. "Employee Adversarial Growth Driven by Organizational Learning in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.
    7. Sergio Ochoa-Jiménez & Beatriz Alicia Leyva-Osuna & Carlos Armando Jacobo-Hernández & Alma Rocío García-García, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Relation to Innovation and Its Effect on the Sustainability of Mexican Tourism Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Akinlotu Olufisayo & Cavlan Gözde Inal, 2023. "Organizational Integration, Knowledge Management, and Sustainable Entrepreneurship for SMEs in Developing Economies," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19.
    10. Niko Sudibjo & Siti Aulia & HG Retno Harsanti, 2022. "Empowering Personal Knowledge Management Among Teachers in Indonesia: A Multi-Faceted Approach using SEM," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    11. Shuwang Zhang & Ghulam Rasool Madni & Iftikhar Yasin, 2022. "Exploring the Mutual Nexus of Social Capital, Social Innovations and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Ghadah Lafi Alharbi & Monira Essa Aloud, 2024. "The effects of knowledge management processes on service sector performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Aleem Ahmad Qader & Jingwei Zhang & Sheikh Farhan Ashraf & Nausheen Syed & Khaoula Omhand & Mehrab Nazir, 2022. "Capabilities and Opportunities: Linking Knowledge Management Practices of Textile-Based SMEs on Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Organizational Performance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Roba Elbawab, 2024. "Linking organisational learning, performance, and sustainable performance in universities: an empirical study in Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Pedro Solana-González & Adolfo Alberto Vanti & María Matilde García Lorenzo & Rafael E. Bello Pérez, 2021. "Data Mining to Assess Organizational Transparency across Technology Processes: An Approach from IT Governance and Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Mahmut Kılıç & Orhan Uludağ, 2021. "The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Performance: Testing the Mediating Effects of Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-27, July.
    17. Md Alamgir Mollah & Jae-Hyeok Choi & Su-Jung Hwang & Jin-Kyo Shin, 2023. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fieras Alfawaire & Tarik Atan, 2021. "The Effect of Strategic Human Resource and Knowledge Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantages at Jordanian Universities: The Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn & Joanna Lesniowska, 2023. "Introducing the open innovation model in Polish biopharmaceutical companies: major drivers and barriers," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 51-77.
    3. Franco Malerba & Maureen McKelvey, 2020. "Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 503-522, February.
    4. Orsatti, Gianluca & Quatraro, Francesco & Pezzoni, Michele, 2020. "The antecedents of green technologies: The role of team-level recombinant capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    5. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Sándor Juhász & Tom Broekel & Ron Boschma, 2021. "Explaining the dynamics of relatedness: The role of co‐location and complexity," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 3-21, February.
    8. Alistair R. Anderson & Jialin Hardwick, 2017. "Collaborating for innovation: the socialised management of knowledge," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1181-1197, December.
    9. Valeriy Kryukov & Anatoliy Tokarev, 2022. "Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 127-146, February.
    10. Akinsola Gbenga Daniel & Farmanesh Panteha & Mwamba Nyota Madhy, 2023. "The Relationship Between Knowledge Risk Management and Sustainable Organizational Performance: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Leadership Behavior," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    12. Orsatti, Gianluca & Pezzoni, Michele & Quatraro, Francesco, 2017. "Where Do Green Technologies Come From? Inventor Teams’ Recombinant Capabilities and the Creation of New Knowledge," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201711, University of Turin.
    13. Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    14. Ghadah Lafi Alharbi & Monira Essa Aloud, 2024. "The effects of knowledge management processes on service sector performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Cheng-Yi Luo & Chin-Hsun (Ken) Tsai & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Jun-Li Gao, 2021. "The Effects of Psychological Capital and Internal Social Capital on Frontline Hotel Employees’ Adaptive Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Kiessling, Timothy & Maley, Jane Frances & Moeller, Miriam & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Managing global knowledge transfer: Inpatriate manager embeddedness and firm innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    17. Andrei Constantin TIRNOVANU & Marian NASTASE & Julia Anamaria SISU & Narcis RADUCAN, 2023. "Approaches To Knowledge Transfer Between Innovative Organizations To Increase Competitiveness And Sustainable Development," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 330-337, November.
    18. Chih-Hsing Liu & Quoc Phong La & Yen-Ling Ng & Rullyana Puspitaningrum Mamengko, 2023. "Discovering the Sustainable Innovation Service Process of Organizational Environment, Information Sharing and Satisfaction: The Moderating Roles of Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Jie Gao & Xinping Huang & Lili Zhang, 2019. "Comparative Analysis between International Research Hotspots and National-Level Policy Keywords on Artificial Intelligence in China from 2009 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10061-:d:454943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.