IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v5y2018i3p542-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge management process model

Author

Listed:
  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

  • Vida Davidavičienė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

  • Artūras Jakubavičius

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

Abstract

In the context of globalization and transformations, the knowledge potential management is an effective tool for increasing the effectiveness of organizations. The aim of the research is to study the procedural approach to the organization knowledge potential management, to distinguish the main knowledge management processes and to present suggestions on how to improve the knowledge management process model. The organization's knowledge potential in this study is defined, as the organization's resources and market opportunities, generating its knowledge potential, complexity and effective management of which create prerequisites for meeting the changing individual user needs, creating reciprocal value, uniqueness and leadership in the global marketplace. The conceptual knowledge management process model has been improved, based on the research. The first step in the model is the choice of a knowledge strategy, covering aspects of the formation and selection of strategic decision-making in knowledge potential management. The choice of an appropriate knowledge strategy brings to its implementation through a process of knowledge management cycle, consisting of knowledge acquisition, sharing, development, preservation and application of it. The knowledge management process model is completed with an evaluation of the knowledge strategy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 542-554, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:542-554
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(10)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/19/Raudeliuniene_Knowledge_management_process_model.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/166
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(10)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerstin Fink & Friedrich Roithmayr, 2005. "Knowledge Potential Measurement - Theoretical Framework And Case Studies -," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Suliman Hawamdeh (ed.), Knowledge Management Nurturing Culture, Innovation, and Technology, chapter 50, pages 571-582, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and Measurement," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 77-96, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. G. P. Girish & Dennis Joseph & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2015. "Factors Influencing Adoption of Knowledge Management Systems in India from a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise’s Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 5(3), pages 135-140.
    4. Editors, 2014. "International Journal of Systems Science," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    3. Matar Ibrahim & Raudeliūnienė Jurgita, 2018. "A Road Map for Enhancing the Entrepreneurial Knowledge Potential of the Lebanese Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 131-141, October.
    4. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Milda Blažytė, 2020. "Knowledge Management Practice in General Education Schools as a Tool for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Valdonė Indrašienė & Violeta Jegelevičienė & Odeta Merfeldaitė & Daiva Penkauskienė & Jolanta Pivorienė & Asta Railienė & Justinas Sadauskas & Natalija Valavičienė, 2021. "Linking Critical Thinking and Knowledge Management: A Conceptual Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Cuixia Zhang & Yaliu Yang & Conghu Liu, 2022. "Knowledge Management-Based Mental Health Service Model: Sustainable Application during College Students’ Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Deden Sumirat Hidayat & Dana Indra Sensuse, 2022. "Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Post-Print hal-01773979, HAL.
    2. Onyema E. Ofoegbu, 2014. "The Role of Knowledge Management on Knowledge Management Perfomance: A Case Study of Some Nigerian Banks," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 53-62, May.
    3. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    4. Hideshi Itoh, 2006. "The Theories of International Outsourcing and Integration : A Theoretical Overview from the Perspective of Organizational Economics," Microeconomics Working Papers 21891, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    5. Moina Ajmeri & Ahmad Ali, 2017. "Analytical design of modified Smith predictor for unstable second-order processes with time delay," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 1671-1681, June.
    6. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    7. Chad Patrizi & Phil Ice & Melissa Burgess, 2013. "Semantic Mapping Of Learning Assets To Align Curriculum And Evidence Learning Effectiveness In Business Education," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 117-128.
    8. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    9. Mourad Kchaou & Ahmed El-Hajjaji, 2017. "Resilient sliding mode control for discrete-time descriptor fuzzy systems with multiple time delays," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 288-301, January.
    10. Changyin Sun & Qing Wang & Yao Yu, 2017. "Robust output containment control of multi-agent systems with unknown heterogeneous nonlinear uncertainties in directed networks," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 1173-1181, April.
    11. Hassan Ghiti Sarand & Bahram Karimi, 2016. "Synchronisation of high-order MIMO nonlinear systems using distributed neuro-adaptive control," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 2214-2224, July.
    12. Nadja Bömmel & Guido Heineck, 2023. "Revisiting the causal effect of education on political participation and interest," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 664-682, November.
    13. Guilherme Frederico, 2017. "Supply Chain Management Maturity: A Comprehensive Framework Proposal from Literature Review and Case Studies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 68-76, January.
    14. Bourguignon, Annick & Saulpic, Olivier & Zarlowski, Philippe, 2006. "Management Accounting Change in the Public Sector: A French Case Study and a New Institutionalist Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 06018, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    15. R. Sakthivel & V. Nithya & Yong-Ki Ma & Chao Wang, 2018. "Finite-Time Nonfragile Dissipative Filter Design for Wireless Networked Systems with Sensor Failures," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, October.
    16. Muhammad Niqab & Janet Hanson & Arthur Bangert & Sathiamoorthy Kannan & Sailesh Sharma & Abdul Ghaffar & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, 2020. "Measuring Intellectual Capital in Schools in the Developing Country of Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    17. Zhang-peng Tian & Hong-yu Zhang & Jing Wang & Jian-qiang Wang & Xiao-hong Chen, 2016. "Multi-criteria decision-making method based on a cross-entropy with interval neutrosophic sets," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(15), pages 3598-3608, November.
    18. Carlos Bianchi & Pablo Galaso & Sergio Palomeque, 2020. "Invention and Collaboration Networks in Latin America: Evidence from Patent Data," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 20-04, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    19. Burcu Yılmaz Kaya & Aylin Adem & Metin Dağdeviren, 2020. "A DSS-Based Novel Approach Proposition Employing Decision Techniques for System Design," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 413-445, March.
    20. M.V. Basin & M. Hernandez-Gonzalez, 2016. "Discrete-time filtering for nonlinear polynomial systems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 2058-2066, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge management; organization knowledge potential; knowledge management processes; procedural approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:542-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.