IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i4p82-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Maksim S. Kolyasnikov

    (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalya R. Kelchevskaya

    (Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

The existing business models essential for the creation of consumer value and, consequently, business competitiveness are now undergoing a transformation. Brand-new technological developments based on network integration, intelligent technology and flexible automation are becoming increasingly relevant: additional competitive opportunities appear, and knowledge management and intellectual capital management are becoming key business processes. When developing a strategic vision, it is important for companies to pick the relevant data out of the information flow about the external and internal environment and convert it into organizational knowledge, which is a core management resource. The paper analyses the experience of Russian and foreign companies in the introduction of scalable models focused on the widespread use of Industry 4.0 and establishes the principles and strategies of knowledge management that allow these companies to maintain their competitive positions in a strategic perspective. The theory of knowledge management and resource approach constitute the methodological framework of the present study. The general scientific methods of logical-structural analysis and systematization, as well as the contingency case study method were applied. The information base encompasses the case studies of six companies, retrieved from publicly available sources. The findings of the empirical research prove the feasibility of applying a situational approach to knowledge management: companies use different strategies for accumulating and sharing knowledge according to their maturity level and the area of implementation of Industry 4.0. Based on the results obtained, the authors develop a situational approach to the strategic knowledge management of companies that successfully apply the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The theoretical and practical significance of the study lies in identifying common approaches to knowledge management under various conditions, which can be used to create the strategic vision of managers involved in the key decision-making process in companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:82-96
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/86/7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2020/678
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Jie, 2010. "The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 215-223, June.
    2. Luiz Antonio Joia, 2007. "Knowledge management strategies: creating and testing a measurement scale," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 203-221.
    3. David Baxter & Rajkumar Roy & James Gao, 2009. "Managing knowledge within the manufacturing enterprise: an overview," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2), pages 183-209.
    4. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 542-554, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Chen & Asma-Qamaliah Abdul-Hamid & Suhaiza Zailani, 2024. "Blockchain Adoption for a Circular Economy in the Chinese Automotive Industry: Identification of Influencing Factors Using an Integrated TOE-TAM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Dragana Rošulj & Dejan Č. Petrović & Siniša M. Arsić, 2024. "Knowledge Management in Serbian SMEs: Key Factors of Influence on Internal and External Business Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Przemysław Niewiadomski & Agnieszka Stachowiak, 2024. "Identification of Barriers to Sustainable Manufacturing Implementation—The Perspective of Manufacturers of Parts and Components for Agricultural Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Tori Reddy DODLA & Laura Ann JONES, 2023. "Identifying knowledge management strategies for knowledge management systems," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(2), pages 261-277, March.
    5. Muawia Ramadan & Tariq Amer & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "The Impact of Integration of Industry 4.0 and Internal Organizational Forces on Sustaining Competitive Advantages and Achieving Strategic Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Andrey A. Zaytsev & Roman S. Blizkyi & Irina I. Rakhmeeva & Nikolay D. Dmitriev, 2021. "Building a Model for Financial Management of Digital Technologies in the Areas of Combinatorial Effects," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Eduardo Marulanda Echeverry & Jaime Alberto Giraldo García & Héctor Mauricio Serna Gómez, 2015. "Modelo de evaluación de gestión del conocimiento para las pymes del sector de tecnologías de la Información," Revista Ad-Minister, Universidad EAFIT, June.
    2. Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Deden Sumirat Hidayat & Dana Indra Sensuse, 2022. "Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, January.
    4. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    5. Parvaneh Rastgoo, 2017. "The Relationship Between Strategic Knowledge Management and Organizational Innovation (Case Study: Bushehr’s Medical Sciences University and Health Care Center)," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 150-155.
    6. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Milda Blažytė, 2020. "Knowledge Management Practice in General Education Schools as a Tool for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    8. Cuixia Zhang & Yaliu Yang & Conghu Liu, 2022. "Knowledge Management-Based Mental Health Service Model: Sustainable Application during College Students’ Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Lucianetti, Lorenzo & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Latan, Hengky, 2018. "Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 318-328.
    10. Ashley S. Otto & David M. Szymanski & Rajan Varadarajan, 2020. "Customer satisfaction and firm performance: insights from over a quarter century of empirical research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 543-564, May.
    11. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Ionela Carmen PIRNEA & Elena Alexandra CALDARARU, 2012. "The relationship between performance and knowledge management in Romanian SMEs," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 512-517, May.
    13. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Haiyun Yu & Yanjie Shang & Nan Wang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2019. "The Mediating Effect of Decision Quality on Knowledge Management and Firm Performance for Chinese Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Valdonė Indrašienė & Violeta Jegelevičienė & Odeta Merfeldaitė & Daiva Penkauskienė & Jolanta Pivorienė & Asta Railienė & Justinas Sadauskas & Natalija Valavičienė, 2021. "Linking Critical Thinking and Knowledge Management: A Conceptual Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Fernando, Yudi & Bee, Poh Swan & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Thomé, Antônio Márcio Tavares, 2018. "Understanding the effects of energy management practices on renewable energy supply chains: Implications for energy policy in emerging economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 418-428.
    17. Haitham Mohsin Kareem & Khairul Azman Aziz & Ruhanita Maelah & Yusasniza Mohd Yunus & Awatif Alsheikh & Warda Alsheikh, 2021. "The Influence of Accounting Information Systems, Knowledge Management Capabilities, and Innovation on Organizational Performance in Iraqi SMEs," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, April.
    18. Eric Zimmerling & Patrick J. Höflinger & Philipp G. Sandner & Isabell M. Welpe, 2016. "A system framework for gamified Cost Engineering," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1063-1084, December.
    19. Huo, Baofeng & Gu, Minhao & Jiang, Bin, 2018. "China-related POM research: Literature review and suggestions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 134-153.
    20. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industry 4.0; knowledge management; strategic management; situational approach; business process; business model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:82-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.