IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v14y2022i1p127-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriy Kryukov
  • Anatoliy Tokarev

Abstract

Development of mineral (mostly hydrocarbon) resources has shaped the social and economic dynamics of Siberia1 and of the Russian Arctic Zone for a long time. The conditions of such development in the upstream oil and gas sector (OGS)2 get increasingly more complicated, enhancing the need for new knowledge and technologies, as well as the role of cooperation among various companies with their special practices and advantages. The patenting activity is a useful indicator here. The oil‐ and gas‐related patenting tends now to be concentrated in capital agglomerations (Moscow, St. Petersburg) and in the Republic of Tatarstan. This process is reinforced by a declining role of cities in Siberia and the Arctic Zone that used to be focal points of local knowledge and competences. The stronger concentration of patenting activity in the metropolitan areas stems to a large degree from the availability of highly qualified personnel, the overall high quality and intensity of research and development (R&D), and the companies’ policies of locating their technology centers in these cities. This situation conforms to the global trend (in our case, at the level of subnational regions) toward a spatial concentration of R&D activities in large companies and R&D centers located in agglomerations. El desarrollo de los recursos minerales (sobre todo de hidrocarburos) ha configurado la dinámica social y económica de Siberia1 y de la zona ártica de Rusia durante mucho tiempo. Las condiciones de este desarrollo en el sector de la exploración y producción del petróleo y del gas2 son cada vez más complicadas, lo que aumenta la necesidad de nuevos conocimientos y tecnologías, así como el papel de la cooperación entre diferentes empresas con prácticas y ventajas diferentes. La actividad en materia de patentes es un indicador útil en este caso. Las patentes relacionadas con el petróleo y el gas tienden ahora a concentrarse en las aglomeraciones de las capitales (Moscú, San Petersburgo) y en la República de Tatarstán. Este proceso se ve reforzado por el declive del papel de las ciudades de Siberia y de la zona ártica, que solían ser focos de conocimientos y pericia locales. La mayor concentración de actividad de patentes en las áreas metropolitanas se debe en gran medida a la disponibilidad de personal altamente cualificado, a la alta calidad e intensidad en general de la investigación y el desarrollo (I+D) y a las políticas de las empresas de ubicar sus centros tecnológicos en estas ciudades. Esta situación se ajusta a la tendencia global (en este caso, a nivel de regiones subnacionales) hacia una concentración espacial de las actividades de I+D en grandes empresas y de centros de I+D situados en las aglomeraciones. 鉱物資源開発(主に炭化水素)は、これまでシベリアとロシアの北極地帯の社会経済を形成してきた。石油・ガスの上流部門におけるこのような開発の条件はますます複雑化しており、新たな知識や技術、そしてそれぞれに専門性や長所がある様々な複数の企業による協力の必要性が高まっている。これに関して、特許活動は有用な指標となる。石油・ガス関連の特許は、現在、資本の集積地(モスクワ、サンクトペテルブルク)やタタールスタン共和国に集中する傾向にある。かつては地域の知識と能力の中心であったシベリアや北極地方の都市の役割が減少しており、この傾向はさらに強くなっている。首都圏に特許活動が集中しているのは、質の高い人材の確保、研究開発(R&D)の全般的な質の高さと強度、そしてこれらの都市にテクノロージーの中心を置くという企業の方針に起因するところが大きい。こうした状況は、研究開発活動が集積地に立地する大企業や研究開発センターに空間的に集中する世界的な傾向(本稿の事例は、地方レベルであるが)と一致するものである。

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriy Kryukov & Anatoliy Tokarev, 2022. "Spatial trends of innovation in the Russian oil and gas sector: What does patent activity in Siberia and the Arctic reflect?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 127-146, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:127-146
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12445
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saviotti, Pier Paolo, 2007. "On the dynamics of generation and utilisation of knowledge: The local character of knowledge," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 387-408, December.
    2. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Gianluca Murgia, 2020. "University–Industry collaborations and international knowledge spillovers: a joint-patent investigation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 958-983, August.
    3. Nivedita Mukherji & Jonathan Silberman, 2013. "Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Flows, And Innovation In U.S. Metropolitan Areas," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 392-417, August.
    4. Hugues Jeannerat & Le�la Kebir, 2016. "Knowledge, Resources and Markets: What Economic System of Valuation?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 274-288, February.
    5. Gavin Bridge, 2008. "Global production networks and the extractive sector: governing resource-based development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 389-419, May.
    6. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2015. "Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 907-920, June.
    7. Rune D. Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2020. "Where cities fail to triumph: The impact of urban location and local collaboration on innovation in Norway," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 5-32, January.
    8. Luigi Orsenigo & Valerio Sterzi, 2010. "Comparative Study of the Use of Patents in Different Industries," KITeS Working Papers 033, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised 2010.
    9. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The Dynamics of Knowledge-intensive Sectors' Knowledge Base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 215-242, April.
    10. Mohammad Nurunnabi, 2017. "Transformation from an Oil-based Economy to a Knowledge-based Economy in Saudi Arabia: the Direction of Saudi Vision 2030," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 536-564, June.
    11. Kryukov, Valeriy & Moe, Arild, 2018. "Does Russian unconventional oil have a future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 41-50.
    12. Maleki, Ali & Rosiello, Alessandro, 2019. "Does knowledge base complexity affect spatial patterns of innovation? An empirical analysis in the upstream petroleum industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 273-288.
    13. Pieter E. Stek, 2020. "Mapping high R&D city-regions worldwide: a patent heat map approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 279-296, February.
    14. A. N. Pilyasov, 2016. "Russia’s Arctic frontier: Paradoxes of development," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 227-239, July.
    15. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors' knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Post-Print hal-02118411, HAL.
    16. John Cantwell, 2009. "Location and the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(1), pages 35-41, January.
    17. Atienza, Miguel & Modrego, Félix, 2019. "The spatially asymmetric evolution of mining services suppliers during the expansion and contraction phases of the copper super-cycle in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 77-87.
    18. V. A. Kryukov & A. N. Tokarev, 2018. "Spatial Dynamics of the Oil and Gas Field Services Sector: Global Trends and Lessons for Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 248-257, July.
    19. E. Carayannis & A. Ilinova & A. Chanysheva, 2020. "Russian Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Projects: Methodological Framework for Evaluating Their Prospects," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1403-1429, December.
    20. Arne Isaksen, 2015. "Industrial development in thin regions: trapped in path extension?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 585-600.
    21. Kais Mtar & Walid Belazreg, 2021. "Causal Nexus Between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: the Case of OECD Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 310-341, March.
    22. Markus Grillitsch & Magnus Nilsson, 2015. "Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(1), pages 299-321, January.
    23. Johnson, Daniel K.N. & Acri nee Lybecker, Kristina M. & Moore, Jeffrey, 2019. "Sure, but who has the energy? The importance of location for knowledge transfer in the energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 582-588.
    24. Arne Isaksen & Bjørn T. Asheim, "undated". "Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway?," STEP Report series 199613, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    25. Fernandez, Viviana, 2020. "Innovation in the global mining sector and the case of Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    26. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors’ knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Post-Print halshs-01225834, HAL.
    27. Irfan Kaygalak & Neil Reid, 2016. "Innovation and knowledge spillovers in Turkey: The role of geographic and organizational proximity," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1-2), pages 45-60, March.
    28. MahdaviMazdeh, Hossein & Saunders, Chad & Hawkins, Richard William & Dewald, Jim, 2021. "Reconsidering the dynamics of innovation in the natural resource industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    29. Allan Dahl Andersen & Anabel Marìn & Erlend O. Simensen, 2018. "Innovation in natural resource-based industries: a pathway to development? Introduction to special issue," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, January.
    30. Nadezhda Zamyatina & Ruslan Goncharov & Alexandra Poturaeva & Alexander Pelyasov, 2020. "The sandwich of Russian space: How different spaces differentiate themes in regional science," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 559-577, August.
    31. V. Kryukov., 2006. "Analysis of the Development of the Subsoil Use System in Russia," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    32. Peter Maskell & Anders Malmberg, 2007. "Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(5), pages 603-618, September.
    33. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Joan Crespo & David L. Rigby, 2019. "Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 1252-1268, September.
    34. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    35. Gerber, Jean-David & Knoepfel, Peter & Nahrath, Stéphane & Varone, Frédéric, 2009. "Institutional Resource Regimes: Towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 798-809, January.
    36. Anne Lorentzen, 2008. "Knowledge networks in local and global space," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 533-545.
    37. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers, 2016. "Agglomerations and the rise of urban network externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. E. Lebedeva, 2023. "A Study of the Development of Innovative Activities in Oil and Gas Regions Using a Cross-Methodological Approach," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-242, April.
    2. V. A. Kryukov & A. N. Tokarev, 2023. "Innovative-Resource Directions of Industrial Development: The Example of the South of the Tyumen Oblast," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 25-32, February.
    3. Anna Komarova, 2022. "State Regulation of Energy Transition and Economic Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ron Boschma, 2018. "The geographical dimension of structural change," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1839, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    2. Sándor Juhász & Tom Broekel & Ron Boschma, 2021. "Explaining the dynamics of relatedness: The role of co‐location and complexity," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 3-21, February.
    3. Jakob Eder & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Innovation in the periphery: compensation and exploitation strategies," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_07, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Mariane Santos Françoso & Vanessa Lima Avanci & Alysson Fernandes Mazoni, 2024. "Green technologies in the knowledge space: Insertion and the moderating role of industry knowledge bases," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 675-697, July.
    5. Francesco Quatraro, 2016. "Co-evolutionary Patterns in Regional Knowledge Bases and Economic Structure: Evidence from European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 513-539, March.
    6. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    7. Ascani, Andrea & Bettarelli, Luca & Resmini, Laura & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre, 2020. "Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    8. Christopher Meyer & Laima Gerlitz & Monika Klein, 2022. "Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    9. Małgorzata Runiewicz-Wardyn & Joanna Lesniowska, 2023. "Introducing the open innovation model in Polish biopharmaceutical companies: major drivers and barriers," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 51-77.
    10. Ron Boschma, 2021. "The role of non-local linkages for innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2113, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Mar 2021.
    11. Komikado, Hiroshi & Morikawa, So & Bhatt, Ayushman & Kato, Hironori, 2021. "High-speed rail, inter-regional accessibility, and regional innovation: Evidence from Japan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kinne, Jan & Krüger, Miriam, 2021. "The strength of weak and strong ties in bridging geographic and cognitive distances," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-049, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Giuseppe Calignano & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Nina Hjertvikrem, 2018. "Innovation networks and green restructuring: Which path development can EU Framework Programmes stimulate in Norway?," PEGIS geo-disc-2018_05, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Franco Malerba & Maureen McKelvey, 2020. "Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 503-522, February.
    15. V. A. Kryukov & A. N. Tokarev, 2022. "The Oil Industry in the South of Tyumen Oblast: Enclaves or Clusters?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 113-123, June.
    16. Orsatti, Gianluca & Quatraro, Francesco & Pezzoni, Michele, 2020. "The antecedents of green technologies: The role of team-level recombinant capabilities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    17. Galetti, Jefferson Ricardo Bretas & Tessarin, Milene Simone & Morceiro, Paulo César, 2020. "Local, Complementarity and Similarity Relatedness in Different Regional and Sectoral Contexts," TD NEREUS 12-2020, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    18. Eduardo Hernandez-Rodriguez, 2024. "Technological diversification through global value chains in European regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2429, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2024.
    19. Colombelli, Alessandra & Quatraro, Francesco, 2018. "New firm formation and regional knowledge production modes: Italian evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 139-157.
    20. Kolja Hesse, 2020. "Related to whom? The impact of organisational and regional capabilities on radical breakthroughs," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2005, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:127-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.