IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9114-d438941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creating a Comprehensive Method for the Evaluation of a Company

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Horak

    (The Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Tomas Krulicky

    (The Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Zuzana Rowland

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business, Okruzni 517/10, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

  • Veronika Machova

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business, Okruzni 517/10, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

For investment purposes, the evaluation of a company is not only a matter for a company itself, but also for shareholders and external persons. There are many methods for evaluating a company. This contribution therefore focuses on the creation of a comprehensive method for the evaluation of an industrial enterprise, one that can be used to predict potential future bankruptcies, using a dataset of financial statements of active companies and those in liquidation in the period 2015–2019. Artificial neural networks were used to process the data, specifically logistic regressions from the data processed in the Statistica and Mathematica software programmes. The results showed that the models created using the Mathematica software are not applicable in practice due to the parameters of the obtained results. In contrast, the artificial neural structures obtained using the neural network model in the Statistica software were prospective due to their performance, which is almost always above 0.8, and the logical economic interpretation of the relevant variables. All the generated and retained networks show excellent performance and few errors. However, one of the artificial structures, network no. 4 (MLP 16-16-2), produces better results than the others. Overall, accuracy is almost 81%. In the case of the classification of companies capable of surviving financial distress, accuracy is almost 90%, with that for the classification of companies at risk of going into bankruptcy at nearly 55%.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Horak & Tomas Krulicky & Zuzana Rowland & Veronika Machova, 2020. "Creating a Comprehensive Method for the Evaluation of a Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9114-:d:438941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9114/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9114/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhizhong Lei, 2020. "Research and analysis of deep learning algorithms for investment decision support model in electronic commerce," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 275-295, June.
    2. Jaromir Vrbka & Elvira Nica & Ivana Podhorska, 2019. "The application of Kohonen networks for identification of leaders in the trade sector in Czechia," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(4), pages 739-761, December.
    3. Marek Vochozka & Jaromir Vrbka & Petr Suler, 2020. "Bankruptcy or Success? The Effective Prediction of a Company’s Financial Development Using LSTM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Zhang, Guoqiang & Y. Hu, Michael & Eddy Patuwo, B. & C. Indro, Daniel, 1999. "Artificial neural networks in bankruptcy prediction: General framework and cross-validation analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 16-32, July.
    5. Shuihua Han & Bin Cao & Yufang Fu & Zongwei Luo, 2018. "A liner shipping competitive model with consideration of service quality management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 155-177, November.
    6. Angelini, Eliana & di Tollo, Giacomo & Roli, Andrea, 2008. "A neural network approach for credit risk evaluation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 733-755, November.
    7. Zhao, Jiahui & Fan, Wei & Zhai, Xuehao, 2020. "Identification of land-use characteristics using bicycle sharing data: A deep learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Salinas, David & Flunkert, Valentin & Gasthaus, Jan & Januschowski, Tim, 2020. "DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1181-1191.
    9. Elena Escrig‐Olmedo & María Jesús Muñoz‐Torres & María Ángeles Fernández‐Izquierdo & Juana María Rivera‐Lirio, 2017. "Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 142-162, February.
    10. Huber, Jakob & Müller, Sebastian & Fleischmann, Moritz & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2019. "A data-driven newsvendor problem: From data to decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 904-915.
    11. Linyun W Yang & Pankaj Aggarwal & Laura Peracchio & Gita Johar & Margaret C Campbell, 2019. "No Small Matter: How Company Size Affects Consumer Expectations and Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1369-1384.
    12. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Tarik Agouti & Abdessadek Tikniouine, 0. "A new integrated methodology using modified Delphi-fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Geospatial Business Intelligence selection," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-29.
    13. Jinying Li & Fan Wu & Jinchao Li & Yunqi Zhao, 2017. "Research on Risk Evaluation of Transnational Power Networking Projects Based on the Matter-Element Extension Theory and Granular Computing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Xiaochun Luo & Zilong Wang & Lin Lu & Yan Guan, 2020. "Supply Chain Flexibility Evaluation Based on Matter-Element Extension," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-12, May.
    15. Irina Kolupaieva & Svitlana Pustovhar & Oleg Suprun & Olena Shevchenko, 2019. "Diagnostics of systemic risk impact on the enterprise capacity for financial risk neutralization: the case of Ukrainian metallurgical enterprises," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(3), pages 471-491, September.
    16. David Alaminos & Agustín del Castillo & Manuel Ángel Fernández, 2016. "A Global Model for Bankruptcy Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Salminen, Joni & Yoganathan, Vignesh & Corporan, Juan & Jansen, Bernard J. & Jung, Soon-Gyo, 2019. "Machine learning approach to auto-tagging online content for content marketing efficiency: A comparative analysis between methods and content type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 203-217.
    18. Hui Hu & Milind Sathye, 2015. "Predicting Financial Distress in the Hong Kong Growth Enterprises Market from the Perspective of Financial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Hong Long Chen, 2018. "Development of a stable corporate bankruptcy classification model: Evidence from Taiwan," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 16-38, May.
    20. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Tarik Agouti & Abdessadek Tikniouine, 2017. "A new integrated methodology using modified Delphi-fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Geospatial Business Intelligence selection," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 897-925, November.
    21. Jaromir Vrbka, 2020. "The use of neural networks to determine value based drivers for SMEs operating in the rural areas of the Czech Republic," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(2), pages 325-346, June.
    22. Morteza Yazdani & Dragan Pamucar & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Shankar Chakraborty, 2020. "Development of a decision support framework for sustainable freight transport system evaluation using rough numbers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(14), pages 4325-4351, July.
    23. Giovanni Lombardo & Andrea Mazzocchetti & Irene Rapallo & Nader Tayser & Silvano Cincotti, 2019. "Assessment of the Economic and Social Impact Using SROI: An Application to Sport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    24. Lucia Maciková & Marián Smorada & Peter Dorčák & Benjamin Beug & Peter Markovič, 2018. "Financial Aspects of Sustainability: An Evidence from Slovak Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    25. Jakub Horak & Jaromir Vrbka & Petr Suler, 2020. "Support Vector Machine Methods and Artificial Neural Networks Used for the Development of Bankruptcy Prediction Models and their Comparison," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    26. Noelia Romero Castro & Juan Piñeiro Chousa, 2006. "An integrated framework for the financial analysis of sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 322-333, September.
    27. Petropoulos, Anastasios & Siakoulis, Vasilis & Stavroulakis, Evangelos & Vlachogiannakis, Nikolaos E., 2020. "Predicting bank insolvencies using machine learning techniques," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1092-1113.
    28. Schaefer, Sarah Desirée & Terlutter, Ralf & Diehl, Sandra, 2019. "Is my company really doing good? Factors influencing employees' evaluation of the authenticity of their company's corporate social responsibility engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 128-143.
    29. Salvatore Loprevite & Domenico Raucci & Daniela Rupo, 2020. "KPIs Reporting and Financial Performance in the Transition to Mandatory Disclosure: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    30. Mehdi Khashei & Zahra Hajirahimi, 2017. "Performance evaluation of series and parallel strategies for financial time series forecasting," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, December.
    31. Liliana Hawrysz & Jolanta Maj, 2017. "Identification of Stakeholders of Public Interest Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    32. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2020. "The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 54-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Bojer, Casper Solheim & Meldgaard, Jens Peder, 2021. "Kaggle forecasting competitions: An overlooked learning opportunity," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 587-603.
    3. Alina Mihaela Dima & Simona Vasilache, 2016. "Credit Risk modeling for Companies Default Prediction using Neural Networks," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 127-143, September.
    4. Justyna Łapińska & Iwona Escher & Joanna Górka & Agata Sudolska & Paweł Brzustewicz, 2021. "Employees’ Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Companies: The Case of Energy and Chemical Industries in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Wang, Shengjie & Kang, Yanfei & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "Combining probabilistic forecasts of intermittent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1038-1048.
    6. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    7. Frison, Lilli & Gölzhäuser, Simon & Bitterling, Moritz & Kramer, Wolfgang, 2024. "Evaluating different artificial neural network forecasting approaches for optimizing district heating network operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    8. Bojer, Casper Solheim, 2022. "Understanding machine learning-based forecasting methods: A decomposition framework and research opportunities," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1555-1561.
    9. Li, Chengjiang & Negnevitsky, Michael & Wang, Xiaolin & Yue, Wen Long & Zou, Xin, 2019. "Multi-criteria analysis of policies for implementing clean energy vehicles in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 826-840.
    10. Wellens, Arnoud P. & Boute, Robert N. & Udenio, Maximiliano, 2024. "Simplifying tree-based methods for retail sales forecasting with explanatory variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 523-539.
    11. Zhen Zeng & Rachneet Kaur & Suchetha Siddagangappa & Saba Rahimi & Tucker Balch & Manuela Veloso, 2023. "Financial Time Series Forecasting using CNN and Transformer," Papers 2304.04912, arXiv.org.
    12. Montero-Manso, Pablo & Hyndman, Rob J., 2021. "Principles and algorithms for forecasting groups of time series: Locality and globality," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1632-1653.
    13. Svabova Lucia & Durica Marek & Podhorska Ivana, 2018. "Prediction of Default of Small Companies in the Slovak Republic," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 88-95, June.
    14. Semenoglou, Artemios-Anargyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Investigating the accuracy of cross-learning time series forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1072-1084.
    15. Lin, Jiahe & Michailidis, George, 2024. "A multi-task encoder-dual-decoder framework for mixed frequency data prediction," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 942-957.
    16. Carlos León & José Fernando Moreno & Jorge Cely, 2016. "Whose Balance Sheet is this? Neural Networks for Banks’ Pattern Recognition," Borradores de Economia 959, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    17. Jakub Horak & Petr Suler & Jaroslav Kollmann & Jan Marecek, 2020. "Credit Absorption Capacity of Businesses in the Construction Sector of the Czech Republic—Analysis Based on the Difference in Values of EVA Entity and EVA Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Wenhui Zhao & Tong Li & Danyang Xu & Zhaohua Wang, 2024. "A global forecasting method of heterogeneous household short-term load based on pre-trained autoencoder and deep-LSTM model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 227-259, August.
    19. Qian, Yilin & Thompson, Ryan & Vasnev, Andrey L, 2022. "Global combinations of expert forecasts," Working Papers BAWP-2022-02, University of Sydney Business School, Discipline of Business Analytics.
    20. Carlos León & Fabio Ortega, 2018. "Nowcasting Economic Activity with Electronic Payments Data: A Predictive Modeling Approach," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 21(2), pages 381-407, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9114-:d:438941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.