IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9078-d438317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credit Absorption Capacity of Businesses in the Construction Sector of the Czech Republic—Analysis Based on the Difference in Values of EVA Entity and EVA Equity

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Horak

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Suler

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

  • Jaroslav Kollmann

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Marecek

    (School of Expertness and Valuation, Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The contribution deals with the economic value added and its influence on credit absorption capacity. The aim was to determine the significance of the difference between the economic value added (EVA) entity and EVA equity indicators on credit absorption by the construction sector in the Czech Republic. The data came from the Albertina database of Bisnode Czech Republic for the period 2012–2018; small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, were selected. The most important factor for calculating the amount of credit absorption depends on the EVA entity indicator and the weighted average cost of capital. The calculations produced negative values for credit absorption, which reflects an unattractive investment climate for business owners and their creditors. In other words, loans sought by enterprises in the Czech construction sector do not lead to a greater degree of realization of their goals, i.e., an increase in value for shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Horak & Petr Suler & Jaroslav Kollmann & Jan Marecek, 2020. "Credit Absorption Capacity of Businesses in the Construction Sector of the Czech Republic—Analysis Based on the Difference in Values of EVA Entity and EVA Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9078-:d:438317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guler Aras & Nuray Tezcan & Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna, 2018. "The value relevance of banking sector multidimensional corporate sustainability performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1062-1073, November.
    2. Lafont, Juan & Ruiz, Felipe & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raul, 2020. "Value creation in listed companies: A bibliometric approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 428-434.
    3. Jaromir Vrbka & Elvira Nica & Ivana Podhorska, 2019. "The application of Kohonen networks for identification of leaders in the trade sector in Czechia," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(4), pages 739-761, December.
    4. Yao, Meifang & Di, He & Zheng, Xianrong & Xu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Impact of payment technology innovations on the traditional financial industry: A focus on China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 199-207.
    5. Najah Attig & Sadok El Ghoul, 2018. "Organization Capital and the Cost of Equity Financing in Medium‐Sized Manufacturing Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 1616-1644, September.
    6. Binh Bui & Olayinka Moses & Muhammad N. Houqe, 2020. "Carbon disclosure, emission intensity and cost of equity capital: multi‐country evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(1), pages 47-71, March.
    7. Hahn, Katrin, 2019. "Innovation in times of financialization: Do future-oriented innovation strategies suffer? Examples from German industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 923-935.
    8. Scalzer, Rodrigo S. & Rodrigues, Adriano & Macedo, Marcelo Álvaro da S. & Wanke, Peter, 2019. "Financial distress in electricity distributors from the perspective of Brazilian regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 250-259.
    9. Eling, Martin & Jia, Ruo, 2018. "Business failure, efficiency, and volatility: Evidence from the European insurance industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 58-76.
    10. Yi Jiang & Stewart Jones, 2018. "Corporate distress prediction in China: a machine learning approach," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 1063-1109, December.
    11. Francesco Gangi & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2020. "How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1975-1991, July.
    12. Seock-Jin Hong & Hossein Najmi, 2020. "The Relationships between Supply Chain Capability and Shareholder Value Using Financial Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Penman, Stephen & Zhang, Xiao-Jun, 2020. "A theoretical analysis connecting conservative accounting to the cost of capital," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
    15. Stewart Jones & Christopher Wright, 2018. "Fashion or future: does creating shared value pay?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 1111-1139, December.
    16. Volodymyr Bazyliuk, 2016. "Theoretical Approaches To Assess Efficiency Of The Transformation Of The Key Business Processes In The Publishing And Printing Activities In The Region," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(4).
    17. Nikolay Halov & Florian Heider, 2011. "Capital Structure, Risk and Asymmetric Information," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(04), pages 767-809.
    18. Blasi, Silvia & Caporin, Massimiliano & Fontini, Fulvio, 2018. "A Multidimensional Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms' Economic Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 218-229.
    19. J. Vrbka & Z. Rowland, 2019. "Assessing the Financial Health of Companies Engaged in Mining and Extraction Using Methods of Complex Evaluation of Enterprises," Contributions to Economics, in: Svetlana Ashmarina & Marek Vochozka (ed.), Sustainable Growth and Development of Economic Systems, pages 321-333, Springer.
    20. Ying Li Compton & Sok-Hyon Kang & Zinan Zhu, 2019. "Gender Stereotyping by Location, Female Director Appointments and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 445-462, December.
    21. Tagliapietra, Simone & Zachmann, Georg & Fredriksson, Gustav, 2019. "Estimating the cost of capital for wind energy investments in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 295-301.
    22. José Luis Miralles‐Quirós & María Mar Miralles‐Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2019. "Diversification benefits of using exchange‐traded funds in compliance to the sustainable development goals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 244-255, January.
    23. Jeffrey L. Callen & Matthew R. Lyle, 2020. "The term structure of implied costs of equity capital," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 342-404, March.
    24. Li, Li, 2018. "Private sector participation and performance of county water utilities in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 30-53.
    25. Serrano-Cinca, Carlos & Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Bernate-Valbuena, Martha, 2019. "The use of accounting anomalies indicators to predict business failure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 353-375.
    26. Shan Zhou & Roger Simnett & Wendy Green, 2017. "Does Integrated Reporting Matter to the Capital Market?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 94-132, March.
    27. Belkhir, Mohamed & Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Stock extreme illiquidity and the cost of capital," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    28. Jaromir Vrbka, 2020. "The use of neural networks to determine value based drivers for SMEs operating in the rural areas of the Czech Republic," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(2), pages 325-346, June.
    29. Tony Chieh‐Tse Hou, 2019. "The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm‐level evidence from Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 19-28, January.
    30. Giovanni Marin & Marianna Marino & Claudia Pellegrin, 2018. "The Impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 551-582, October.
    31. Atanas Mihov & Andy Naranjo, 2019. "Corporate internationalization, subsidiary locations, and the cost of equity capital," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1544-1565, December.
    32. Martin Esch & Benedikt Schnellbächer & Andreas Wald, 2019. "Does integrated reporting information influence internal decision making? An experimental study of investment behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 599-610, May.
    33. Pingyang Gao, 2019. "Idiosyncratic Information, Moral Hazard, and the Cost of Capital," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 2178-2206, December.
    34. Tesfaye T. Lemma & Martin Feedman & Mthokozisi Mlilo & Jin Dong Park, 2019. "Corporate carbon risk, voluntary disclosure, and cost of capital: South African evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 111-126, January.
    35. Sujata Behera, 2020. "Correction to: Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-1, December.
    36. Tomas Kliestik & Jaromir Vrbka & Zuzana Rowland, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in Visegrad group countries using multiple discriminant analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 569-593, September.
    37. Giovanni Marin & Marianna Marino & Claudia Pellegrin, 2018. "The impact of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance," Post-Print hal-01768870, HAL.
    38. Alexandridis, George & Antypas, Nikolaos & Gulnur, Arman & Visvikis, Ilias, 2020. "Corporate financial leverage and M&As choices: Evidence from the shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    39. Xu, Zhaoxia, 2020. "Economic policy uncertainty, cost of capital, and corporate innovation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    40. Jones, Stewart & Wang, Tim, 2019. "Predicting private company failure: A multi-class analysis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 161-188.
    41. Filippo Vitolla & Antonio Salvi & Nicola Raimo & Felice Petruzzella & Michele Rubino, 2020. "The impact on the cost of equity capital in the effects of integrated reporting quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 519-529, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Mirela Panait & Arkadiusz Babczuk, 2022. "Can the Economic Value Added Be Used as the Universal Financial Metric?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Jiří Kučera & Marek Vochozka & Zuzana Rowland, 2021. "The Ideal Debt Ratio of an Agricultural Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuradhi Kalpani Jayasiri & Sriyalatha Kumarasinghe & Rakesh Pandey, 2023. "12 years of integrated reporting: A review of research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2187-2243, June.
    2. Annika Wahl & Michel Charifzadeh & Fabian Diefenbach, 2020. "Voluntary Adopters of Integrated Reporting – Evidence on Forecast Accuracy and Firm Value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2542-2556, September.
    3. Renato Garzón-Jiménez & Ana Zorio-Grima, 2021. "Effects of Carbon Emissions, Environmental Disclosures and CSR Assurance on Cost of Equity in Emerging Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Mohammed S. Albarrak & Ngan Duong Cao & Aly Salama & Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, 2023. "Twitter carbon information and cost of equity: the moderating role of environmental performance," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 693-718, September.
    5. Jonathan Colmer & Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2020. "Does pricing carbon mitigate climate change? Firm-level evidence from the European Union emissions trading scheme," CEP Discussion Papers dp1728, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Themann, Michael & Koch, Nicolas, 2021. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Ruhr Economic Papers 904, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    7. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    8. Simone Lazzini & Zeila Occhipinti & Angela Parenti & Roberto Verona, 2021. "Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2332-2353, July.
    9. D’Arcangelo, Filippo Maria & Pavan, Giulia & Calligaris, Sara, 2022. "The Impact of the European Carbon Market on Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," FEEM Working Papers 324170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    10. Abe, Tatsuya & Arimura, Toshi H., 2022. "Causal effects of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on energy consumption and economic performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Giulia Pavan & Sara Calligaris, 2022. "The Impact of the European Carbon Market on Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," Working Papers 2022.24, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Arjan Trinks & Erik Hille, 2023. "Carbon costs and industrial firm performance: Evidence from international microdata," CPB Discussion Paper 445, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Saussay, Aurélien & Zugravu-Soilita, Natalia, 2023. "International production chains and the pollution offshoring hypothesis: An empirical investigation," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Marit Klemetsen & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Anja Lund Jakobsen, 2020. "The Impacts Of The Eu Ets On Norwegian Plants’ Environmental And Economic Performance," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-32, February.
    16. Teixidó, Jordi & Verde, Stefano F. & Nicolli, Francesco, 2019. "The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2021. "The impact of energy prices on socioeconomic and environmental performance: Evidence from French manufacturing establishments, 1997–2015," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. aus dem Moore, Nils & Großkurth, Philipp & Themann, Michael, 2019. "Multinational corporations and the EU Emissions Trading System: The specter of asset erosion and creeping deindustrialization," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-26.
    19. Yuji Shirabe & Makoto Nakano, 2022. "Does Integrated Reporting Affect Real Activities Manipulation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Böning, Justus & Di Nino, Virginia & Folger, Till, 2023. "Benefits and costs of the ETS in the EU, a lesson learned for the CBAM design," Working Paper Series 2764, European Central Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9078-:d:438317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.