IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8618-d430645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Equation Modeling for Mobile Learning Acceptance by University Students: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed

    (Department of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammad Mahtab Alam

    (Department of Basic Medical Science, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nasser Tairan

    (Department of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Advanced mobile devices and global internet services have enhanced the usage of smartphones in the education sector and their potential for fulfilling teaching and learning objectives. The current study is an attempt to assess the factors affecting mobile learning acceptance by Saudi university students. A theoretical model of mobile learning acceptance was developed based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Theoretically, five independent constructs were identified as most contributory towards the use of mobile learning and tested empirically. Data were collected through an online survey and analyzed using SmartPLS. The results of the study indicate that four constructs were significantly associated with mobile learning acceptance: perceived usefulness (β = 0.085, t = 2.201, and p = 0.028), perceived ease of use (β = 0.031, t = 1.688, and p = 0.013), attitude (β = 0.100, t = 3.771, and p = 0.037), and facilitating conditions (β = 0.765, t = 4.319, and p = 0.001). On the other hand, social influence was insignificant (β = −0.061, t = 0.136, and p = 0.256) for mobile learning acceptance. The contribution of social influence towards the use of mobile learning was negative and insignificant; hence, it was neglected. Thus, finally, four constructs (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude, and facilitating conditions) were considered as important determinants of mobile learning acceptance by university students.

Suggested Citation

  • Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Nasser Tairan, 2020. "Structural Equation Modeling for Mobile Learning Acceptance by University Students: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8618-:d:430645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Abramson & Maurice Dawson & Jeffery Stevens, 2015. "An Examination of the Prior Use of E-Learning Within an Extended Technology Acceptance Model and the Factors That Influence the Behavioral Intention of Users to Use M-Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, December.
    2. Naim Ahmad & Noorulhasan Naveed Quadri & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Mohammad Mahtab Alam, 2018. "Relationship Modeling of Critical Success Factors for Enhancing Sustainability and Performance in E-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Naim Ahmad & Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Ayyub Patel & Mohammed Abohashrh & Mohammed Abdul Khaleel, 2021. "E-Learning Services to Achieve Sustainable Learning and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Heena Choudhary & Naim Ahmad & Jarallah Alqahtani & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash, 2023. "Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Adam Malešević & Dušan Barać & Dragan Soleša & Ema Aleksić & Marijana Despotović-Zrakić, 2021. "Adopting xRM in Higher Education: E-Services Outside the Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash & Mohamed Rafik N. Qureshi & Naim Ahmad & Mohammed Aref Abdul Rasheed & Md Akhtaruzzaman, 2023. "Analyzing Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Cloud-Based Mobile Learning (CBML) in Crisp and Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Md. Zahid Alam & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Md. Nazmus Sadekin & Mohamad Ghozali Hassan & Mohammad Morshedur Rahman, 2021. "Influence of Social Distancing Behavior and Cross-Cultural Motivation on Consumers’ Attitude to Using M-Payment Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2021. "Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Sustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2023. "Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with Learning Input Factors: The Effects of Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking Skills on Learning Performance Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Ibrahim Youssef Alyoussef, 2021. "E-Learning Acceptance: The Role of Task–Technology Fit as Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Peijie Jiang & Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Mailizar Mailizar & Zulfah Zulfah & Astuti Astuti, 2022. "How Micro-Lectures Improve Learning Satisfaction and Achievement: A Combination of ECM and Extension of TAM Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Yiming Cao & Robert Weinhandl & Eri Yusron & Zsolt Lavicza, 2022. "Applying the UTAUT Model to Understand Factors Affecting Micro-Lecture Usage by Mathematics Teachers in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abide Coskun-Setirek & Zuhal Tanrikulu, 2021. "M-Universities: Critical Sustainability Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, March.
    2. Naim Ahmad & Ayman Qahmash, 2021. "SmartISM: Implementation and Assessment of Interpretive Structural Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Amedeo Maizza & Monica Fait & Paola Scorrano & Antonio Iazzi, 2019. "How Knowledge Sharing Culture Can Become a Facilitator of the Sustainable Development in the Agrifood Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Naim Ahmad & Najmul Hoda & Fahad Alahmari, 2020. "Developing a Cloud-Based Mobile Learning Adoption Model to Promote Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Omar Habets & Beatrice Van der Heijden & Omar Ramzy & Jol Stoffers & Pascale Peters, 2021. "Employable through Social Media: An Intervention Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Heng Xu & Jingru Wang & Zhaodan Tai & Hao-Chiangkoong Lin, 2021. "Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting User Switching Behavior of Online Learning Platform Based on Push-Pull-Mooring Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash & Muna Al-Razgan & Karishma M. Qureshi & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Ali A. Alwan, 2022. "Evaluating and Prioritizing Barriers for Sustainable E-Learning Using Analytic Hierarchy Process-Group Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Nafiz A.Ali Ahmad & Abdelrahim M. Zabadi, 2022. "Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Understanding the Preschool Teachers in Palestine Technology' Acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic," Eximia Journal, Plus Communication Consulting SRL, vol. 4(1), pages 63-83, April.
    9. Melih Engin & Nihat Kasap & Berna Tektas Sivrikaya, 2020. "User Acceptance of Shuttle Bus Decision Support System Based on Smartphone Probes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    10. Marcel Pikhart & Blanka Klímová, 2020. "eLearning 4.0 as a Sustainability Strategy for Generation Z Language Learners: Applied Linguistics of Second Language Acquisition in Younger Adults," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, May.
    11. Mohammad Mahtab Alam & Naim Ahmad & Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Ayyub Patel & Mohammed Abohashrh & Mohammed Abdul Khaleel, 2021. "E-Learning Services to Achieve Sustainable Learning and Academic Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Mónica Martínez-Gómez & Eliseo Bustamante & César Berna-Escriche, 2022. "Development and Validation of an E-Learning Education Model in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in Secondary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Mohammed Rafiqul Islam & Rimon Sarker & Rebaka Sultana & Md. Faisal-E-Alam & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Daniel Meyer, 2023. "Understanding the COVID-19 Pandemic’s Impact on E-Learner Satisfaction at the Tertiary Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Ali Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh & Sultan Almutairy & Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, 2021. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mobile Learning for Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8618-:d:430645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.